Skip to content

Comparative Measurements of Interface Pressures Between Two Pressure-ulcer Prevention Mattresses: Softform Premier and Airsoft Duo

Comparative Measurements of Interface Pressures Between Two Pressure-ulcer Prevention Mattresses: Softform Premier and Airsoft Duo

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02380820
Acronym
SPA2-INVACARE
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-03-05
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pressure Ulcer

Keywords

Mattress, Preventing bed sores, Skin pressure

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to compare the Softform Premier mattress (in static mode) and AIRSOFT DUO mattresses in terms of skin pressures measured at the sacral area.

Detailed description

The secondary objectives of the study are to compare the two devices in terms of: A. contact surface. B. heel pressure. C. On the occurrence of pressure ulcers anywhere on the body at month 1. D. patient comfort after 1 month (visual analog scale ranging from 1 to 10).

Interventions

DEVICEAirsoft Duo mattress

A multi-layer mattress for pressure sore prevention. Made by NAUER FOAMPARTNER AG et OBA AG (Germany).

DEVICESoftform Premier mattress (in static mode)

A multi-layer mattress for pressure sore prevention. Made by INVACARE MSS (United Kingdom).

Sponsors

Invacare Poirier S.A.S.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent * The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan * The patient spends more than 12 hours in bed with a possible verticalization and a predictable length of stay of at least 1 month. * The patient has a stable medical condition (no complications in the last 10 days) without pressure ulcers * The patient is at risk of pressure ulcers assessed a score ≤ 14 on the Norton scale * The patient's weight is less than 120 Kg

Exclusion criteria

* The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study * The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship * The patient refuses to sign the consent * It is impossible to correctly inform the patient * Contra-indication for strict decubitus dorsal position * The patient has a rotation of the pelvis, asymmetric deformations of the hips in the frontal plane. * The patient has bedsores, a recent scar in a pressure area. * The patient has a knee flexion deformity\> 10 ° * The patient is agitated or uncooperative * The patient's weight is greater than 120 Kg

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Interface pressure in the sacral zone (mm Hg) as measured by a Model X3 sensor pressure captor sheetDay 1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contact surface area (cm^2) as measured by a Model X3 sensor pressure captor sheetDay 1
Interface pressure at the heel (mm Hg) as measured by a Model X3 sensor pressure captor sheetDay 1
Presence/absence of a pressure ulcer over the past month1 month
Patient-rated comfort as measured by the visual analog scale1 monthVisual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10

Other

MeasureTime frame
Norton risk scoreBaseline (Day 0)
Age (years)Baseline (Day 0)
AlbuminemiaBaseline (Day 0)
Sex (F/M)Baseline (Day 0)
Weight (kg)Baseline (Day 0)
Height (cm)Baseline (Day 0)
Body mass index (kg/m^2)Baseline (Day 0)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026