Skip to content

Thermoregulation and Cognition During Cool Ambient Exposure in Tetraplegia

Thermoregulation and Cognition During Cool Ambient Exposure in Tetraplegia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02379156
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-03-04
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tetraplegia, Hypothermia, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Quadriplegia, Spinal Cord Injury, Body Temperature Regulation, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Brief summary

The ability to maintain normal core body temperature (Tcore = 98.6°F) is impaired in persons with a cervical spinal cord injury (tetraplegia). Despite the known deficits in the ability of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) to maintain Tcore, and the effects of hypothermia to impair mental function in able-bodied (AB) persons, there has been no work to date addressing these issues in persons with tetraplegia. Primary Aim: To determine if exposure of up to 2 hours to cool temperatures (64°F) causes Tcore to decrease in persons with tetraplegia, and if that decrease is associated with a decrease in cognitive function. Primary Hypotheses: Based on our pilot data: (1) 66% of persons with tetraplegia and none of the matched controls will demonstrate a decline of 1.8°F in Tcore; (2) 80% of persons with tetraplegia and 30% of controls will have a decline of at least one T-score in Stroop Interference scores (a measure of executive function). Secondary Aim: To determine the change in: (1) distal skin temperature, (2) metabolic rate, and (3) thermal sensitivity. Secondary Hypothesis: Persons with tetraplegia will have less of a percent change in average distal skin temperatures and metabolic rate, and report lower thermal sensitivity ratings compared with AB controls. Tertiary Aim: To determine if a 10 mg dose of an approved blood pressure-raising medicine (midodrine hydrochloride) will (1) reduce the decrease in Tcore and (2) prevent or delay the decline in cognitive performance in the group with tetraplegia compared to the exact same procedures performed on the day with no medicine (Visit 1) in that same group. Tertiary Hypothesis: Through administering a one-time dose of midodrine, the medicine-induced decreased blood flow to the skin will lessen the decline in Tcore and prevent or delay the associated decline in cognitive performance compared to the changes in Tcore and cognitive performance during cool temperature exposure without midodrine in the same group with tetraplegia.

Detailed description

This study will investigate the mechanisms contributing to thermoregulatory fragility in persons with tetraplegia when exposed to cool ambient temperatures that are routinely encountered during their activities of daily living (ADL). Subnormal body core temperatures and vulnerability to hypothermia (Tcore\<95°F) have been reported in Veterans with tetraplegia upon exposure to relatively mild environmental temperatures. The impact that a drift in Tcore will be expected to have on cognitive performance, specifically working memory and executive function, will be demonstrated. These 2 areas of cognitive performance are vital for the ability to optimally care for one's self, which persons with higher cord lesions must excel at to ensure health and to attain the maximal degree of independence possible. The one-time administration of an alpha agonist, midodrine hydrochloride, in an attempt to attenuate the drift in Tcore and prevent or delay the expected decline in cognitive performance to exposure to cool on cognitive function will be investigated as well. Preparation for Study Visits: The study visits will be at least 1 day apart but no more than 2 weeks apart. Subjects will be provided a light, standard meal which they will be asked to eat 2 hours prior to their scheduled visit time. The meal will be either a plain bagel or 2 pieces of toast. For each visit, subjects will be asked to empty their bladders before their arrival and again upon arrival, if needed. Subjects will be asked to avoid caffeinated and alcoholic beverages and heavy exertion for 24-hours before testing. Subjects will wear minimal clothing (gym shorts, sports bra) during the study to maximize bare skin exposure to the cool temperature. Visit 1: Cold Ambient Challenge Instrumentation: During the subject's first visit, a thin flexible rectal sensor will be placed 4 inches beyond the anal sphincter for Tcore measurement, and skin thermal sensors will be taped at 15 sites above and below the level of lesion for collection of skin temperature (Tsk). A mask will be placed over the subject's nose and mouth for measurement of exhaled gases from which resting metabolic rate will be calculated from analysis of expired gases (VO2) by a metabolic cart. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) will be used to measure changes in microvascular perfusion by taping a laser doppler probe on the skin in the area of the ulnar styloid processes and medial malleoli bilaterally to confirm vasoconstriction. A pulse oximeter will be placed on the left second digit to obtain blood oxygen saturation and heart rate (HR). An automated blood pressure cuff will be placed above the right elbow to measure brachial blood pressure (BP). An intravenous catheter will be placed in the right antecubital or nearby vein and secured for sequential blood collection for blood hormones (cortisol and norepinephrine). Baseline Collection: At the end of the 30-minute acclimation period (81°F), a 15-minute baseline (BL) collection of the following measures will be performed: Tcore, Tsk, and VO2 will be measured continuously; BP, HR, blood oxygenation, and thermal sensitivity will be measured at 5-minute intervals; 5 minutes of LDF will be measured at 10-minute intervals; a venous blood draw will be collected once for norepinephrine and cortisol concentrations. At the end of the BL period, a cognitive performance battery will be given. Cool Ambient Challenge: Following the completion of the baseline period, subjects will be wheeled into a 64°F thermal room for 120 minutes or until Tcore ≤ 95°F. Tcore, Tsk, and VO2 will be continuously monitored for safety throughout the study, while BP, HR, blood oxygenation, and thermal sensitivity will be measured every 10 minutes. LDF will be measured for 5 minutes every 25 minutes, and venous blood will be collected every 60 minutes. The cognitive performance battery will be administered when Tcore has declined 1.8°F or is ≤ 95.9°F (in subjects with tetraplegia) or after 120 minutes of cold exposure (in both groups). A decrease in Tcore to ≤ 95°F, or moderate subject discomfort, will result in termination of the protocol. Subjects will be transferred to a warm room (81°F), covered with warming blankets, and given warm fluids. If symptoms continue, Dr. William Bauman will assess the subject and provide the appropriate care. Visit 2: Cold Ambient Challenge with Midodrine Visit 2 will be completed in the subjects with tetraplegia who participated in Visit 1 and demonstrated an impaired ability to maintain Tcore. All procedures will be conducted in the seated position and will be the same as in Visit 1, with the exception of the oral administration of a 10 mg tablet of midodrine hydrochloride following the completion of the baseline period. Forty minutes after midodrine administration (in order for the medicine's effects to start), a second baseline collection will be performed and subjects will then be placed inside the 64°F thermal room for up to 2 hours or until Tcore ≤ 95°F. Data collection will follow the same schedule and be conducted in the same seated position as in Visit 1. During Visit 2, BP will be continuously monitored after midodrine administration for safety purposes. If subjects' BP increases to 160/90 mmHg, subjects will be seen by Dr. William Bauman, who may consider the administration of labetalol, if necessary.

Interventions

Midodrine hydrochloride is an approved medication used to treat low blood pressure. We are using a standard dose of 10 mg (tablet) only one time to determine if the vascular-constricting effects of this drug will help keep warm blood closer to the body's core and improve the ability to maintain Tcore in a cool environment (off-label use). A physician will administer the drug once before the cool thermal challenge in subjects with tetraplegia only (Visit 2).

OTHERCool Temperature

Subjects will be exposed to a routinely encountered cool temperature (64° F) for up to to 2 hours depending on the vital signs (BP, HR, Tcore) and tolerance (comfort).

Sponsors

The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 68 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Duration of SCI ≥1 year; * Level of SCI C3-T1, AIS A & B; * Age between 18 and 68 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of sympathetic integrity below the lesion level by the skin axon-reflex vasodilatation (SkARV) test; * Known allergies to midodrine hydrochloride; * Past Medical History (PMH) of diagnosed heart, kidney, peripheral vascular, or cerebral vascular disease, or diabetes mellitus; * Hypertension (BP\>140/90 mmHg); * Untreated thyroid disease; * Acute illness or infection; * Current smoker; * Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Core Body Temperature120 minutesWe measured the effects of cool temperature (64°F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the ability to maintain a constant Tcore (i.e., Tcore of 98.6°F) in all intervention arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Cognitive Performance - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS IV)120 minutesCognitive performance was assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test, which measures working memory and attention. The test consists of three subtests: Digit Span Forward, Digit Span Backward, and Digit Span Sequencing. Each subtest yields a scaled score ranging from 1 to 19 based on age-based normative data. The total scaled score is obtained by summing the three subtest scores, resulting in a possible total scaled score range of 3 to 57. For each subtest (Digit Span Forward, Digit Span Backward, and Digit Span Sequencing) and for the total scaled score, higher scores indicate better working memory performance (better outcome), while lower scores indicate poorer working memory performance (worse outcome). Assessments were conducted at baseline (BL) and after cold ambient exposure. The reported results represent the percent change in each participant's total scaled score from baseline to post-exposure (\[(Cold - BL) / BL\] × 100).
Change in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk)120 minutesWe measured the effects of cool ambient exposure (64°F) in each intervention arm by taping 4 thermocouples to the skin of distal areas of the extremities (i.e. the fingers and toes).
Percent Change in Microvascular PerfusionUp to 120 minutesWe measured the effects of ambient cool exposure (64°F), for up to 120 minutes, on microvascular perfusion by taping laser doppler flowmetry (LDF) probes to the skin of the hands and feet. LDF was measured in all intervention arms and compared the percent changes in microvascular perfusion within and between groups.
Percent Change in Oxygen Consumption (VO2)Up to 120 minutes.We measured the effects of ambient cool exposure (64°F), for up to 120 minutes, on oxygen consumption (VO2) as a measure of resting metabolic rate. VO2 was measured in all intervention arms to compare the percent changes within and between groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Able-bodied Cool Temperature Exposure / No Drug
Subjects are able-bodied persons, ages 18-65 years matched for age and gender to the SCI group. Procedure is exposure to cool temperature (64° F) for up to 2 hours in a temperature-controlled room in order to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance (Visit 1). Cool Temperature: Subjects will be exposed to a routinely encountered cool temperature (64° F) for up to to 2 hours depending on the vital signs (Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, Tcore) and tolerance (comfort).
15
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With Midodrine
The study consists of two visits separated by a 14-day washout period. The subjects are persons with tetraplegia: spinal cord lesion levels C3 to T1, AIS levels A and B, ages 18-65. The Cool Temperature Exposure consists of a 64° F temperature-controlled room for up to 2 hours. Visit 1 (120 minutes, SCI Cool Exposure without drug) consists of SCI Cool Temperature Exposure for up to 2 hours to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance. A washout period of 14 days separates Visit 1 and Visit 2. In Visit 2 (120 minutes, SCI Cool Exposure with drug), subjects who completed Visit 1 and did not rescind their study participation during the washout period are administered a 10 mg tablet of midodrine hydrochloride by a physician before being exposed to cool temperature (64° F) for up to 2 hours in a temperature-controlled room to assess the body's temperature-regulating mechanisms and any associated change in cognitive performance.
12
Total27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAble-bodied Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugSCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Age, Continuous41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.38
37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Body Mass Index (BMI)26.42 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.28
25.19 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.77
25.93 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Black or African American
9 Participants0 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Hispanic
2 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
White Non-Hispanic
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants10 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 140 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 140 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 140 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Core Body Temperature

We measured the effects of cool temperature (64°F) exposure, of up to 120 minutes, on the ability to maintain a constant Tcore (i.e., Tcore of 98.6°F) in all intervention arms.

Time frame: 120 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugChange in Core Body TemperatureChange in Core Temperature during Cool Temperature Exposure (64 °F, 120 minutes), no drug-0.24 °CStandard Deviation 0.33
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugChange in Core Body TemperatureChange in Core Temperature during Cool Temperature Exposure (64 °F, 120 minutes), drugNA °C
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrineChange in Core Body TemperatureChange in Core Temperature during Cool Temperature Exposure (64 °F, 120 minutes), no drug-0.97 °CStandard Deviation 0.33
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrineChange in Core Body TemperatureChange in Core Temperature during Cool Temperature Exposure (64 °F, 120 minutes), drug0.79 °CStandard Deviation 0.28
Comparison: Between-group differences in the change in core body temperature (Tcore) from baseline (BL) values to after cold exposure (Cold) were analyzed using a Mixed Model ANOVA. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia would have a greater decrease in Tcore when exposed to cool ambient temperature than control participants exposed to the same cool ambient temperature.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Comparison: Within-group differences in the change in (Tcore) in the participants with tetraplegia from BL values to Cold, with and without a dose of 10 mg of midodrine (two separate visits), were analyzed using a Repeated Measures ANOVA .p-value: 0.006ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk)

We measured the effects of cool ambient exposure (64°F) in each intervention arm by taping 4 thermocouples to the skin of distal areas of the extremities (i.e. the fingers and toes).

Time frame: 120 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugChange in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk)Change in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk), no drug-10.82 °CStandard Deviation 2.1
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugChange in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk)Change in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk), drugNA °C
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrineChange in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk)Change in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk), no drug-4.35 °CStandard Deviation 1.69
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrineChange in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk)Change in Distal Skin Temperature (Tsk), drug-1.45 °CStandard Deviation 2.25
Comparison: Between-group differences in the change in distal skin temperature temperature (Tsk) from baseline (BL) values to after ambient cold exposure (Cold) were analyzed using a mixed-model ANOVA for the AB vs Tetra comparison. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia would have a smaller change in Tsk due to being in a constant state of vasodilation.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Comparison: Within-group differences in the change in distal skin temperature temperature (Tsk) from baseline (BL) values to after ambient cold exposure (Cold) were analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA for the within-group comparison of drug vs no drug in the tetraplegia group. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia with drug would have a larger decrease in Tsk due to enhanced peripheral vasoconstriction due to the drug's effects.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change in Cognitive Performance - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS IV)

Cognitive performance was assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test, which measures working memory and attention. The test consists of three subtests: Digit Span Forward, Digit Span Backward, and Digit Span Sequencing. Each subtest yields a scaled score ranging from 1 to 19 based on age-based normative data. The total scaled score is obtained by summing the three subtest scores, resulting in a possible total scaled score range of 3 to 57. For each subtest (Digit Span Forward, Digit Span Backward, and Digit Span Sequencing) and for the total scaled score, higher scores indicate better working memory performance (better outcome), while lower scores indicate poorer working memory performance (worse outcome). Assessments were conducted at baseline (BL) and after cold ambient exposure. The reported results represent the percent change in each participant's total scaled score from baseline to post-exposure (\[(Cold - BL) / BL\] × 100).

Time frame: 120 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugPercent Change in Cognitive Performance - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS IV)Percent Change in Cognitive performance - (WAIS IV), no drug3.81 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 15.9
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugPercent Change in Cognitive Performance - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS IV)Percent Change in Cognitive performance - (WAIS IV), drugNA Percent Change
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrinePercent Change in Cognitive Performance - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS IV)Percent Change in Cognitive performance - (WAIS IV), no drug-11.08 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 21.47
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrinePercent Change in Cognitive Performance - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS IV)Percent Change in Cognitive performance - (WAIS IV), drug-1.73 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 16.98
Comparison: Between-group differences in the percent change in total WAIS IV scores from BL to after cold ambient exposure were analyzed using an independent samples T-test. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia would have a greater percent change in total WAIS IV scores due to impaired cognitive function post cool ambient exposure.p-value: 0.042t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group differences in the percent change in total WAIS IV scores from BL to after cold ambient exposure were analyzed using a paired samples t-test. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia in the No Drug condition would have a greater percent change in total WAIS IV scores than the same participants in the With drug condition.p-value: 0.149t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percent Change in Microvascular Perfusion

We measured the effects of ambient cool exposure (64°F), for up to 120 minutes, on microvascular perfusion by taping laser doppler flowmetry (LDF) probes to the skin of the hands and feet. LDF was measured in all intervention arms and compared the percent changes in microvascular perfusion within and between groups.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugPercent Change in Microvascular PerfusionPercent Change in Microvascular Perfusion, no drug-56.13 Percent change in arbitrary unitsStandard Deviation 12.4
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugPercent Change in Microvascular PerfusionPercent Change in Microvascular Perfusion, drugNA Percent change in arbitrary units
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrinePercent Change in Microvascular PerfusionPercent Change in Microvascular Perfusion, no drug-10.93 Percent change in arbitrary unitsStandard Deviation 41.34
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrinePercent Change in Microvascular PerfusionPercent Change in Microvascular Perfusion, drug-29.42 Percent change in arbitrary unitsStandard Deviation 10.9
Comparison: Between-group differences in the percent change in microvascular perfusion from baseline to after cool ambient exposure were analyzed using independent samples T-test. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia would have a smaller percent change in microvascular perfusion due impaired vasomotor control which causes a constant state of vasodilation.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group differences in the percent change in microvascular perfusion from baseline to after cool ambient exposure were analyzed using a paired samples t-test. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia in the No Drug condition would have a smaller percent change in microvascular perfusion due impaired vasomotor control which causes a constant state of vasodilation.p-value: 0.066t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percent Change in Oxygen Consumption (VO2)

We measured the effects of ambient cool exposure (64°F), for up to 120 minutes, on oxygen consumption (VO2) as a measure of resting metabolic rate. VO2 was measured in all intervention arms to compare the percent changes within and between groups.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugPercent Change in Oxygen Consumption (VO2)Percent Change in oxygen consumption (VO2), no drug-6.25 percent change in VO2Standard Deviation 11.36
Able-bodied Control Cool Temperature Exposure / No DrugPercent Change in Oxygen Consumption (VO2)Percent Change in oxygen consumption (VO2), drugNA percent change in VO2
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrinePercent Change in Oxygen Consumption (VO2)Percent Change in oxygen consumption (VO2), no drug1.88 percent change in VO2Standard Deviation 14.8
SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With no Drug First, Then SCI Cool Temperature Exposure With MidodrinePercent Change in Oxygen Consumption (VO2)Percent Change in oxygen consumption (VO2), drug1.13 percent change in VO2Standard Deviation 16.72
Comparison: Between-group differences in the percent change in VO2 from baseline to after cool ambient exposure were analyzed using independent samples t-test. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia would have a smaller percent change in VO2 consumption.p-value: 0.127t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group differences in the percent change in VO2 consumption from baseline to after cool ambient exposure were analyzed using a paired samples t-test. We hypothesized that participants with tetraplegia in the No Drug condition would have a greater percent change in VO2 consumption due to impaired vasoconstriction and greater heat loss compared to the With Drug condition, in response to cool ambient exposure.p-value: 0.964t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026