Premature Ejaculation
Conditions
Keywords
Premature ejaculation, general practice, sexual dysfunction
Brief summary
Many male patients complain about their ejaculation: 21-30% of men aged between 18 and 59 have admitted suffering from a decrease in, or loss of control of, their ejaculation. The quality of life of patients and their partners is impaired compared to men not suffering from premature ejaculation. Economically, the impact of the disease are significant. In the year preceding the detection of premature ejaculation patients visit twice their physician. The majority of men interviewed anonymously, in their General Practitioner's ( GP's) waiting room, considered it important to talk with their GP about their sexual concerns. Almost half of them preferred that their GP initiate any discussions about sexuality. More than two thirds of the respondents would have liked their GP to signal his or her open-mindedness by directly addressing sexual topics during the consultation. In 2008 a qualitative study brought to the fore the strategies used by GPs to initiate the discussion on premature ejaculation . GPs who mentioned premature ejaculation with their patient described three attitude-related strategies and three investigative strategies.
Interventions
OTHERQuestionary SF12 and PEDT (Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool)
The SF-12 was designed to measure general health status from the patient's point of view (12 questions are asking to the patients) and the PEDT questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire to diagnose premature ejaculation (5 questions are asking to the patients).
OTHERTotal attention
Total attention of the GP to approach the subject of premature ejaculation during all the consultation
OTHERHumour
Use the humour to approach the subject of premature ejaculation
OTHERTake the drama out
Take the drama out to approach the subject of premature ejaculation
OTHERQuestion about premature ejaculation
Question about premature ejaculation during the GP consultation
OTHERSymptoms of premature ejaculation
GP's observation about signs of premature ejaculation
OTHERHelp to verbalize
Help for the patient to speak about premature ejaculation
Sponsors
University Hospital, Brest
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Masking description
The study is based on the participation of general practitioners in a training, the test is necessarily open for doctors. However patients will not know if their doctor has received training and will be blinded .
Intervention model description
This study is a multicenter trial. Patients will be followed either by GPs from the interventional group who trained in communication skills or by the control group who never participated. The distribution of general practitioners in the groups is done thanks random draw .
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Male patients overbetween 18 and 80 years old and * Patients consulting for a sexual, urogenital or psychological reason according to Interntational Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2) will be included.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients consulting for Aanother reason for visiting thethan urogenital pattern, sexual or psychological * Nonunderstanding of the French language * Patients with psychiatric disorders affecting judgement * Patient refusal to participate in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The impact of training general practitioners in communication skills | Day 0 - 4 weeks | The impact of training general practitioners in communication skills on the rate of patients bringing up the topic of premature ejaculation with their GP. To measure the proportions of patients bringing up the topic of premature ejaculation with their GP, the GPs in the two groups were asked to fill in a questionnaire after the consultation on whether the topics tackled were genital, urinary or psychological. The aim of detailing the different topics broached was to avoid contamination bias in the control group. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of quality of life | Day 0 - 4 weeks | The quality of life will be evaluated with the SF-12 health assessment scale. The SF-12 was designed to measure general health status from the patient's point of view. The SF-12 includes 8 concepts commonly represented in health surveys: physical functioning, role functioning physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role functioning emotional, and mental health. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed