Skip to content

Effect of Fee on Attendance in Cervical Cancer Screening

Effect of Fee on Attendance in Cervical Cancer Screening-results From ScreenFee a Swedish Population Based Randomised Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02378324
Enrollment
3124
Registered
2015-03-04
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2015-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Dysplasia

Keywords

Attendance, Screening without fee

Brief summary

Several reasons can explain non-attendance in cervical cancer screening. In low resource settings the attendance is even lower. The effect of fee as contributing reason of non attendance has not been studied before why the investigators decided to study this in a low resource setting as a randomised trial.

Detailed description

Non-attendance in the cervical cancer screening programme is the most important factors why Swedish women contract the disease. Low attendance rate is observed in districts with low socioeconomic resources. Several reasons can explain this, including the existence of a fee. A low attendance rate in low resource districts is also noticed in Gothenburg, Sweden. After multiple interventions the coverage has slightly increased. None of the interventions included the aspect of the fee. The investigators decided to study the effect of fee abolishment in a randomized control trial emanating from the regular cervical cancer-screening program. Method: Randomized Control Trial (RCT). Women in low resource areas of Gothenburg, due for screening, January-July 2013, were randomised to receive an offer of a free test or receiving the regular invitation stating the regular fee of 100 Swedish kronor (SEK) (≈11 €). Power calculation has shown 80 % power to detect an increase in participation of 20% at 1972 participants.

Interventions

OTHERScreening without fee

All women in three districts in Gothenburg, Sweden, that were eligible for invitation in the regular screening program were individually randomized by computer program in two parallel arms 1:1.

Sponsors

Göteborg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
23 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All women in the designated geographical area, consecutively enrolled in planned screening according to standard routine. I.e women are invited if they are between 23 and 60 years of age and don't have a pap smear registered the last three or five years according to age.

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in attendance6 monthsInformation from the database regarding study arm was linked, via citizen unique personal number, to the National Cervical Screening Quality Register. From this database aggregated information of attendance was extracted. The effect of the intervention on attendance was calculated as relative risks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences in attendance stratified for age groups, home districts and previous pap smear history.6 monthsBefore analysing the results of which kind of invitation the woman got, age group, previous pap smear history and district, all personal information was anonymized.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026