Skip to content

Staying Strong With Schools - A School-Based Resilience Support Intervention for Military-Connected Children

Staying Strong With Schools - A School-Based Resilience Support Intervention for Military-Connected Children: A Preliminary Examination of Efficacy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02378051
Enrollment
190
Registered
2015-03-04
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2017-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Staying Strong With Schools Intervention, Waitlist Control

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine whether Staying Strong With Schools, a school-based intervention to support military-connected children, will be helpful for school professionals and military parents in supporting specific needs of this population of children. As part of the partnership between three school districts in Massachusetts and the Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Home Base Program, the investigators will examine the efficacy of a training delivered to these schools. The schools will be randomly divided into two groups (like a toss of a coin). Half of the schools will receive the training in 2014-2015, and the other half will be waitlisted and receive the training the following year (2015-2016). All participants (school teachers, military-connected children, and their parents) will be asked to complete questionnaires the first year. The investigators hypothesize that, compared to the control schools, at the end of the school year, SSWS schools will be associated with: (1) greater sense of competence and quality of relationships with military-connected children (MCC) among school professionals; (2) lower parental distress and increased parental sense of competence and general family functioning; and (3) increased social support, and fewer academic, emotional, and behavioral problems among MCC. The investigators hypothesize that an increase in school professionals' sense of competence in identifying and handling MCC's needs, increased quality of relationships with MCC, lower parental distress, increased parental sense of competence, and increased general family functioning will mediate the efficacy of SSWS on MCC's social support and psychosocial functioning.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStaying Strong with Schools Intervention

1. On-Site Training to Raise Awareness about the Stress of Parental Deployment and Review Resources Helpful in Promoting military-connected children (MCC)'s Resilience. A 60-minute training will be delivered by our Liaison Trainer on-site to school professionals at the beginning of the school year. 2. Training and supervision of the Resilience Support Liaison (RSL). In each school receiving the Staying Strong with Schools intervention, we will train the guidance counselor to take on the role of a RSL. The RSL will develop for each MCC an individual resilience support plan that will outline the specific intervention components that will be applied for him/her.

OTHERWaitlist Control

Receipt of an educational pamphlet outlining resources useful to support military-connected children distributed to all educators at the beginning of the school year.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* For school teachers: age 18 or older, employed as teacher in a participating school, willingness to participate in the intervention and able to participate in the informed consent process. * For military-connected children: age \< 18, and currently in grade 1 through 6, student in a participating school, at least one parent who currently serves, or had served in the military since 9/11/01, children without a participating classroom teacher will not receive teacher-rated assessments, but will not be excluded from the school based intervention, parent gives permission for child to participate. * For military parents: male or female, age 18 or older, parent of a child enrolled in one of the participating schools, parent or co-parent currently serves, or had served in the military since 9/11/01, parent of a military-connected child that is eligible to participate, willing to participate, and able to give informed consent, and permission to release test scores, and have their child participate in SSWS, and self-report, parental and teachers' assessments.

Exclusion criteria

* For teachers: unable to attend the initial training, unable to participate in the informed consent process. * For military-connected children: decline participation, determination by the principal or teacher that participation would not be in the military-connected child's best interest for any reason. * For military parents: unable to participate in the informed consent process.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scaleup to two yearsTeachers' Sense of Efficacy is the beliefs in their capability to make a difference in student learning, to be able to get through even to students who are difficult or unmotivated. The Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale asks teachers to assess their capability concerning instructional strategies, student engagement, and classroom management. It will assess teachers' sense of competence in handling military-connected children's needs.
The Student-Teacher Relationship Scaleup to two yearsThe Student-Teacher Relationship Scale (STRS) is widely used to examine teachers' relationships with young students in terms of closeness, conflict, and dependency. It will assess the quality of teachers' relationships with military-connected children.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
McMaster Family Assessment Deviceup to two yearsFamily functioning will be assessed using the general functioning subscale of McMaster Family Assessment Device. The GF subscale consists of 12 questions to permit individuals to rate how well each statement describes their family by selecting among four responses: strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree.
Parenting Sense of Competence Scaleup to two yearsThe Parenting Sense of Competence scale measures parental competence on two dimensions: Satisfaction and Efficacy. It is a 16 item Likert-scale questionnaire (on a 6 point scale ranging from strongly agree \[1\] to strongly disagree \[6\]), with nine questions under Satisfaction and seven under Efficacy. Satisfaction section examines the parents' anxiety, motivation and frustration, while the Efficacy section looks at the parents' competence, capability levels, and problem-solving abilities in their parental role.
Child and Adolescent Social Support Scaleup to two yearsPerceived social support will be assessed using the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale. Subjects respond to items using a six-point scale, ranging from 1= never, to 6 =always.
Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Editionup to two yearsMaladaptive and adaptive behaviors and self-perceptions will be assessed using the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition. In this study, parents will be the informants. This measure assesses child's behaviors in the school setting (Teacher Rating; TRS) as well as the home and community setting (Parent Rating; PRS) without substantial burden.
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scaleup to two yearsParental distress will be assessed using the 21-item self-report Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. Items each reflect a negative emotional symptom. Each of these is rated on a four-point Likert scale of frequency or severity of the participants' experiences over the last week with the intention of emphasizing states over traits. These scores ranged from 0, meaning that the client believed the item did not apply to them at all, to 3 meaning that the client considered the item to apply to them very much, or most of the time.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026