Skip to content

Comparison of the Clinical Performance of 3 THERANOVA 400 Dialyzer Prototypes With a High-Flux Dialyzer in Hemodialysis Mode

Comparison of the Clinical Performance of 3 THERANOVA 400 Dialyzer Prototypes With a High-Flux Dialyzer in Hemodialysis Mode - A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02377570
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-03-03
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2025-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Disease

Brief summary

The study investigates the performance of a new dialyzer (Theranova 400) containing a membrane with increased pore sizes. The performance will be determined by the removal of middle molecules (with different molecular size) from the blood compartment. Three different Theranova 400 prototypes (AA, BB and CC) operated in hemodialysis mode will be compared with a Cordiax FX-80 dialyzer, operated in hemodialysis mode. Safety events and albumin loss into the dialysate will be monitored

Interventions

DEVICETHERNOVA 400 dialyzer prototype CC

Hemodialysis

Hemodialysis

Sponsors

Baxter Healthcare Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Vantive Health LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient has end-stage renal disease 2. Patient is 18 years of age or older 3. Patient is male or female 4. Patient, if female, is non-pregnant; and if capable of becoming pregnant, will be using a medically acceptable means of contraception during participation in the study (Note: Female capable of becoming pregnant \[defined as a woman less than 55 years old who has not had partial or full hysterectomy or oophorectomy\] must have a negative serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin \[β-hCG\] test within 2 weeks of first study treatment) 5. Patient has been receiving HD or HDF therapy (HDF patients are allowed if their treatments during the study can be safely and effectively performed with HD) for ≥3 months prior to study enrollment and is expected to survive for at least 12 months after enrollment 6. Patient has a stable functioning native fistula, Gore-Tex graft, or double-lumen central venous catheter capable of providing a blood flow rate of ≥280 mL/min (with an acceptable recirculation rate, such that solute removal is not likely to be affected) based on the judgment of the treating physician 7. Patient is in clinically stable condition as judged by the treating physician and as demonstrated by stable medical history for 30 days prior to enrollment, physical examination, and laboratory testing 8. Patient is willing to comply with the study requirements for therapy during the entire study treatment period 9. Patient is capable of providing written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient is undergoing single-needle dialysis 2. Patient has an abnormal κ/λ ratio (less than 0.37, or greater than 3.1) 3. Patient has a known active infection and is currently receiving antibiotic treatment 4. Patient has known active cancer 5. Patient has a known positive serology test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B, C or E 6. Patient has a known serious hemostasis disorder 7. Patient has a known monoclonal gammopathy (eg, monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance, smouldering \[asymptomatic\] multiple myeloma, symptomatic multiple myeloma, nonsecretory multiple myeloma, plasmacytomas, or plasma cell leukemia) 8. Patient has a known polyclonal gammopathy (eg, connective tissue disease, liver disease, chronic infection, lymphoproliferative disorder, or other hematologic condition) 9. Patient has any other known comorbidity that could, in the opinion of the Investigator, potentially conflict with the study purpose or procedures (eg, severe hypoalbuminemia or anemia) 10. Patient has a known significant psychiatric disorder or mental disability that could interfere with the patient's ability to provide informed consent and/or comply with protocol procedures 11. Patient has a history of non-compliance with the dialysis prescription, as assessed by the Investigator 12. Patient has participated in another interventional clinical study in the past 3 months, or is currently participating in another interventional clinical study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall clearance of lambda immunoglobulin free light chains (molecular weight 45 kDa)One mid-week dialysis sessionThe primary efficacy endpoint is the overall clearance of lambda immunoglobulin free light chains during a mid-week hemodialysis session, assessed once with each experimental and active comparator product

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall clearance of a set of molecules with molecular sizes between 60 Da and 40 kDaOne mid-week dialysis sessionOne secondary efficacy endpoint is the overall clearance of a set of molecules from 60 Da to 40 kDa during one mid-week hemodialysis session, assessed once with each experimental and active comparator product
Total mass removed of a set of molecules with molecular sizes between 60 Da and 45 kDaOne mid-week dialysis sessionOne secondary efficacy endpoint is the total mass removed of a set of molecules from 60 Da to 45 kDa during one mid-week hemodialysis session, assessed once with each experimental and active comparator product
Removal rate of a set of molecules with molecular sizes between 60 Da and 45 kDaOne mid-week dialysis sessionOne secondary efficacy endpoint is the removal rate of a set of molecules from 60 Da to 45 kDa during one mid-week hemodialysis session, assessed once with each experimental and active comparator product
Instantanous clearance of a set of molecules with molecular sizes between 60 Da and 45 kDaAt 30 min from start of a mid-week dialysis sessionOne secondary efficacy endpoint is the instantaneous clearance of a set of molecules with molecular sizes from 60 Da to 45 kDa at 30 min after start of a mid-week hemodialysis session, assessed once with each experimental and active comparator product
Post- to pre-dialysis changes in a set of hematology parameters (blood cell counts, hematocrit and hemoglobin)One mid-week dialysis sessionOne secondary safety endpoint is the change in hematology parameters during one mid-week hemodialysis session, assessed once with each experimental and active comparator product
Types and frequency of adverse events and device deficiencies as a measure of safety and dialyzer tolerabilityContinuously, from signature of informed consent form until 1 week after last hemodialysis session with an experimental or active comparator product, an expected average of 29 daysAny adverse events and device deficiencies will be recorded.
Total mass removed of albuminOne mid-week dialysis sessionOne secondary safety endpoint is the total removed mass of albumin during one mid-week hemodialysis session, assessed once with each experimental and active comparator product

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026