Skip to content

ART-3 Pilot - Driving Pressure Limited Ventilation for Patients Without ARDS (ART3pilot)

ART-3 Pilot: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Feasiblity of a Driving Pressure Limited Ventilation vs.Standard Strategy in Patients Without ARDS

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02376647
Acronym
ART-3pilot
Enrollment
0
Registered
2015-03-03
Start date
2022-03-31
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2022-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

Patients, ARDS diagnosis

Brief summary

This is a multicenter randomized controlled pilot trial to investigate the feasibility of a driving pressure limited mechanical ventilation strategy compared to a conventional strategy in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Detailed description

Mechanical ventilation has the potential to produce or worsen alveolar injury. Driving pressure is the difference between plateau pressure and PEEP. Evidence from observational studies suggests that elevated driving pressure is the main independent determinant of ventilator-induced lung injury, however clinical trials are needed to establish whether targeting low driving pressures can improve clinical outcomes in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thus, ART-3 pilot is a multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of a driving pressure limited mechanical ventilation strategy compared to a conventional strategy in patients without ARDS. Patients considered to this trial are those in mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours without diagnosis of ARDS. We will exclude patients with less than 18 years old; contraindication to hypercapnia such as intracranial hypertension or recent acute coronary syndrome; patients in which a high probability of death within 24 hours is anticipated and patients under exclusive palliative care. Eligible patients will be randomized to the driving pressure limited ventilation strategy or conventional strategy (tidal volume of 8 mL/kg of predicted body weight). The primary outcome is driving pressure between days 1 and 3.

Interventions

Investigators will use volume controlled (or pressure support ventilation) and adjust tidal volume between 3 and 8 mL/Kg of predicted body weight in order to achieve a driving pressure of 13 cmH2O. The respiratory rate will be titrated to achieve a pH between 7.30 and 7.45 (maximum respiratory rate is 50 breathings per minute). Investigators will not limit plateau pressure in this arm. Once a daily the investigators will assess the target tidal volume that generates a driving pressure of 13cmH2O. The patient should be sedated and without spontaneous efforts during this assessment.

Investigators will use volume controlled or pressure support ventilation, tidal volume ≤8 mL/kg of predicted body weight and plateau pressure limited to 30 cmH2O.The respiratory rate will be titrated to achieve a pH between 7.30 and 7.45 (maximum respiratory rate is 35 breathings per minute).

Sponsors

Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital do Coracao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients on invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours and without diagnosis of ARDS, and no perspective of extubation in 24 hours.

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 18 years old * Presence of any contraindication to hypercapnia as suspected or confirmed intracranial hypertension or recent (\<7 days) acute coronary syndrome. * Patients in which a high probability of death within 24 hours is anticipated. * Patients under exclusive palliative care.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean driving pressure between Day 1 and Day 3From Day 1 to Day 3 after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of mechanical ventilation free days from day 0 to day 28From day 0 to day 28
Rate of investigators adering to study proceduresDays 1 to 7
Rate of driving pressure equal or lower than 13 cmH2ODays 1 to 3 after randomization
Mean of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) from day 1 to 7Days 1 to 7
Mean tidal volume from day 1 to 7Days 1 to 7
Mean static compliance of the respiratory system from day 1 to 7Days 1 to 7
Mean plateau pressure from day 1 to 7Days 1 to 7
Mean driving pressure from day 1 to 7Days 1 to 7
Lenght of stay in hospitalPatients will be followed during the period of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days
Number of patients with barotraumaDays 1 to 7
Mean of severe acidosis (pH <7.1)Days 1 to 7
Number of patients with other adverse eventsDays 1 to 7
Lenght of stay in intensive care unitPatients will be followed during the period of ICU stay, an expected average of 28 days
ICU mortalityPatients will be followed during the period of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days
In-hospital mortalityPatients will be followed during the period of hospital stay, an expected average of 28 days
28-day survivalFrom day 0 to day 28
Mean respiratory rate from day 1 to 7Days 1 to 7

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026