Skip to content

Metformin for Rising PSA Remote Trial

M-RePoRT: Metformin - Rising PSA Remote Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02376166
Acronym
M-RePoRT
Enrollment
15
Registered
2015-03-03
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

Clinical trials are critical to informing the care of patients with cancer. However, only 3-5% of patients with cancer enroll in clinical trials. Poor accrual to trials has major implications with regards to the pace of progress, the cost of clinical cancer research, and the generalizability of results. The investigators have recently shown in an analysis of 7,776 cancer clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov that approximately 20% of cancer clinical trials fail to complete enrollment at all; the most often cited reason was poor accrual. Prior research has identified barriers to cancer clinical trial accrual that can be generally categorized in the domains of availability, awareness, and acceptance. Much attention has been paid to the barriers involvement awareness and acceptance - however, trial availability is likely a rate limiting step. This pilot study is the first in a series of planned steps to attempt to shift the current paradigm of bringing patients to trials to bringing trials to patients. With the integration of telemedicine visits, the investigators aim to decrease the burden of participation for patients, begin to address geographic barriers, and ultimately improve trial accrual. In this study, men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (a rising PSA after definitive local therapy) will receive the antidiabetic drug, metformin. Patients will require a single on-site visit for study enrollment. The remainder of the 6 month study will be conducted via a HIPPA secure telemonitoring system (monthly visits conducted via telemedicine with tablet computers provided to each patients).

Detailed description

Men with an isolated PSA recurrence after local therapy are an ideal population for the evaluation of novel therapies given the minimal disease burden, generally indolent natural history, and patients' preference to avoid the adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy. Metformin has shown anti-prostate cancer activity in preclinical models and cohort studies. Metformin, a biguanide oral antihyperglycemic agent, abrogates hyperinsulinemia in individuals with and without diabetes and has shown promising anti-prostate cancer activity in preclinical models, epidemiologic studies, and retrospective cohorts. Several epidemiologic/retrospective studies have shown that metformin has a positive impact on overall survival among men with prostate cancer. These nonclinical and clinical studies have led to calls for prospective studies of metformin in patients with prostate cancer. This is a pilot telemedicine study of metformin in patients with a rising PSA (biochemical recurrence) after definitive local therapy for prostate cancer. The current study is supported by the following rationale: * A large proportion of clinical trials close prematurely due to poor accrual. * Geographic inaccessibility is a barrier to clinical trial participation. * Metformin is a safe and inexpensive medication that has demonstrated anti-prostate cancer activity in nonclinical and epidemiologic studies. Importantly, metformin has been shown to be safe in non-diabetic patients (e.g., patients with polycystic ovary disease) and does not cause hypoglycemia. * Use of novel technologies may facilitate clinical trial accrual and minimize the burden of participation for patients. Ultimately, these approaches may also decrease the cost of drug development and increase the pace of progress. In the absence of prohibitive toxicities or disease progression (defined in 4.4), patients may continue treatment for the 6-month study period. This study will include a baseline visit for study enrollment at Mount Sinai. The remainder of the visits will be telemedicine visits conducted using secure video conferencing.

Interventions

DRUGMetformin

850 mg PO twice daily for the remainder of the study period (the dose of metformin will be increased to the 850 mg PO twice daily dose in the absence of grade \> 1 toxicities)

Sponsors

Matthew Galsky
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate. (\*in situations where pathology reports documenting prostate cancer are no longer available such as when the initial biopsy or prostatectomy was performed in the remote past, a documented history of prior prostate cancer and prostate cancer treatment in prior medical records will be sufficient) * Biochemical disease progression after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy (external-beam radiation therapy and/or brachytherapy), and no radiographic evidence of metastases. * Men with history of radical prostatectomy are required to have baseline PSA \> 0.5 ng/mL (Prior treatment with neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or salvage radiation therapy is allowed, again, with screening PSA greater than or equal to 0.5 ng/mL required for eligibility). * Men treated with primary radiation therapy are required to have baseline PSA ≥ 1.0 ng/mL above their post radiation nadir for men who were treated with primary radiation therapy (external beam and/or brachytherapy). Men who had primary radiation therapy followed by salvage prostatectomy are eligible if screening PSA is greater than or equal to 0.5 ng/mL. * Men with previous neoadjuvant adjuvant hormone therapy are eligible if testosterone level at screening is non-castrate (≥ 50 ng/dl). Men previously treated with intermittent hormonal therapy are also eligible if level of testosterone at screening is non-castrate (≥ 50 ng/dl). * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 2 (Karnofsky greater than or equal to 60%). * Subjects must have normal organ as defined below: * AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) less than or equal to 1.8 X institutional upper limit of normal * Serum bilirubin ≤ ULN (except for subjects with Gilbert's Disease who are eligible despite elevated serum bilirubin level) * Creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL and/or creatinine clearance \> 60 ml/min * English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Concurrent use of other investigational agents or other prostate cancer therapies (e.g., androgen deprivation therapy) * Currently taking metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinedione, insulin, or other antidiabetic drugs for any reason. * Known hypersensitivity or intolerance to metformin * Condition associated with increased risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis: * New York Heart Association Class III or IV Heart Failure * Intake of 3 or more alcoholic beverages per day * Known history of lactic acidosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants That Completed All Telemedicine Visits6 monthsFeasibility will be defined as completion of all telemedicine visits by \> 2/3 of enrolled patients (unless treatment discontinued early for toxicity or disease progression).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence With Metformin as Measured by Electronic Pill Adherence Monitoring6 monthsAdherence with metformin as measured by electronic pill adherence monitoring. Patients were provided with an electronic medication dispenser/medication adherence monitoring device. The device provided audible and visual reminders to proceed with drug dosing and was equipped with a cellular modem that registers a signal to a cloud-based database each time a patient accessed his or her study medication. However, the size and shape of the metformin pills caused the device to malfunction frequently, which led patients to access the pills from the device manually; the data, therefore, could not be used for analysis.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 16 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I would participate in a clinical trial in the future.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 26 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I would participate in a telemedicine clinical trial in the future.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 36 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - The time commitment required for participation in this trial was not overly burdensome.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 46 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - Participation in this trial did not disrupt my work or other activities.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 56 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I found it easy to use the telemonitoring tablet computer.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 66 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - This telemedicine approach eases the travel burden for participation in clinical trials for patients.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 76 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - This telemedicine approach eases the financial burden of participation in clinical trials for patients.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 86 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - My local physician was adequately informed about my participation in this trial (if applicable).
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 96 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I felt I was monitored sufficiently closely while enrolled in this trial.
Percentage of Participants With Stable PSA Levels at 6 Months as Defined by a <20% Changebaseline and 6 monthPercent of patients with 6-month PSA stable 20% change at 6 months as compared to baseline
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 116 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I would participate in a clinical trial where the entire trial was conducted remotely without requiring any visits to the study center.
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 126 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I felt that I was able to communicate well with the study team, even though most contact was through the tablet computer video instead of in person.
Urgency to Have a Bowel Movement Episodes6 monthsQuality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Ist reported outcome - Number of episodes of urgency to have a bowel movement
Increased Frequency of Bowel Movements6 monthsQuality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Ist reported outcome - Number of episodes of Increased frequency of bowel movements
Episodes of Watery Bowel Movements6 monthsQuality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 2st reported outcome - Number of episodes of watery bowel movements
Episodes of Flatulence6 monthsQuality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 3rd reported outcome - Number of episodes of flatulence
Episodes of Bloating6 monthsQuality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 4th reported outcome - Number of episodes of bloating
Episodes of Nausea6 monthsQuality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 5th reported outcome - Number of episodes of nausea
Episodes of Vomiting6 monthsQuality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 6th reported outcome - Number of episodes of vomiting
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 106 monthsPatient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I would recommend participation in a telemedicine clinical trial to other patients.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Metformin
850 mg PO once daily for 4 weeks
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDiscontinued metformin early2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMetformin
Age, Continuous68 years
Baseline PSA4.1 ng/mL
Gleason Score7 units on a scale
One-way driving distance to study center63.2 miles
One-way driving time to study center71 minutes
Primary Treatment
Radiation therapy
3 Participants
Primary Treatment
Radical prostatectomy
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
Years from local therapy to study enrollment5.9 years

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants That Completed All Telemedicine Visits

Feasibility will be defined as completion of all telemedicine visits by \> 2/3 of enrolled patients (unless treatment discontinued early for toxicity or disease progression).

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminNumber of Participants That Completed All Telemedicine Visits12 Participants
Secondary

Adherence With Metformin as Measured by Electronic Pill Adherence Monitoring

Adherence with metformin as measured by electronic pill adherence monitoring. Patients were provided with an electronic medication dispenser/medication adherence monitoring device. The device provided audible and visual reminders to proceed with drug dosing and was equipped with a cellular modem that registers a signal to a cloud-based database each time a patient accessed his or her study medication. However, the size and shape of the metformin pills caused the device to malfunction frequently, which led patients to access the pills from the device manually; the data, therefore, could not be used for analysis.

Time frame: 6 months

Secondary

Episodes of Bloating

Quality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 4th reported outcome - Number of episodes of bloating

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetforminEpisodes of BloatingModerate problem0 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of BloatingBig problem0 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of BloatingNo problem8 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of BloatingVery small problem1 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of BloatingSmall problem1 episodes
Secondary

Episodes of Flatulence

Quality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 3rd reported outcome - Number of episodes of flatulence

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetforminEpisodes of FlatulenceNo problem8 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of FlatulenceVery small problem1 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of FlatulenceSmall problem1 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of FlatulenceModerate problem0 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of FlatulenceBig problem0 episodes
Secondary

Episodes of Nausea

Quality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 5th reported outcome - Number of episodes of nausea

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetforminEpisodes of NauseaNo problem8 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of NauseaVery small problem1 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of NauseaSmall problem0 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of NauseaModerate problem1 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of NauseaBig problem0 episodes
Secondary

Episodes of Vomiting

Quality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 6th reported outcome - Number of episodes of vomiting

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetforminEpisodes of VomitingNo problem10 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of VomitingVery small problem0 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of VomitingSmall problem0 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of VomitingModerate problem0 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of VomitingBig problem0 episodes
Secondary

Episodes of Watery Bowel Movements

Quality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. 2st reported outcome - Number of episodes of watery bowel movements

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetforminEpisodes of Watery Bowel MovementsNo problem4 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of Watery Bowel MovementsVery small problem3 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of Watery Bowel MovementsSmall problem2 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of Watery Bowel MovementsModerate problem1 episodes
MetforminEpisodes of Watery Bowel MovementsBig problem0 episodes
Secondary

Increased Frequency of Bowel Movements

Quality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Ist reported outcome - Number of episodes of Increased frequency of bowel movements

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetforminIncreased Frequency of Bowel MovementsNo problem6 episodes
MetforminIncreased Frequency of Bowel MovementsVery small problem3 episodes
MetforminIncreased Frequency of Bowel MovementsSmall problem0 episodes
MetforminIncreased Frequency of Bowel MovementsModerate problem1 episodes
MetforminIncreased Frequency of Bowel MovementsBig problem0 episodes
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 1

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I would participate in a clinical trial in the future.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 2 patients did not complete the questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 1Strongly agree10 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 1Agree3 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 1Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 1Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 1Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 10

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I would recommend participation in a telemedicine clinical trial to other patients.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 10Strongly agree11 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 10Agree2 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 10Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 10Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 10Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 11

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I would participate in a clinical trial where the entire trial was conducted remotely without requiring any visits to the study center.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 11Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 11Strongly disagree1 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 11Strongly agree8 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 11Agree3 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 11Neither agree nor disagree1 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 12

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I felt that I was able to communicate well with the study team, even though most contact was through the tablet computer video instead of in person.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 12Strongly disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 12Strongly agree12 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 12Agree1 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 12Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 12Disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 2

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I would participate in a telemedicine clinical trial in the future.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 2Strongly agree9 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 2Agree4 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 2Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 2Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 2Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 3

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - The time commitment required for participation in this trial was not overly burdensome.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 3Strongly agree11 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 3Agree2 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 3Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 3Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 3Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 4

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - Participation in this trial did not disrupt my work or other activities.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 4Strongly agree11 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 4Agree2 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 4Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 4Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 4Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 5

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I found it easy to use the telemonitoring tablet computer.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 5Strongly agree5 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 5Agree2 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 5Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 5Disagree4 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 5Strongly disagree2 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 6

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - This telemedicine approach eases the travel burden for participation in clinical trials for patients.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 6Strongly agree10 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 6Agree3 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 6Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 6Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 6Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 7

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - This telemedicine approach eases the financial burden of participation in clinical trials for patients.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 7Strongly agree11 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 7Agree2 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 7Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 7Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 7Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 8

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - My local physician was adequately informed about my participation in this trial (if applicable).

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 8Strongly agree11 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 8Agree2 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 8Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 8Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 8Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 9

Patient satisfaction with the remote clinical trial experience as measured by a patient satisfaction survey - I felt I was monitored sufficiently closely while enrolled in this trial.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 9Strongly agree11 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 9Agree2 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 9Neither agree nor disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 9Disagree0 Participants
MetforminPatient Satisfaction as Measured by a Patient Satisfaction Survey Question 9Strongly disagree0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Stable PSA Levels at 6 Months as Defined by a <20% Change

Percent of patients with 6-month PSA stable 20% change at 6 months as compared to baseline

Time frame: baseline and 6 month

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MetforminPercentage of Participants With Stable PSA Levels at 6 Months as Defined by a <20% Change7 Participants
Secondary

Urgency to Have a Bowel Movement Episodes

Quality of LIfe as measured by a modified RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Ist reported outcome - Number of episodes of urgency to have a bowel movement

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetforminUrgency to Have a Bowel Movement EpisodesNo problem4 episodes
MetforminUrgency to Have a Bowel Movement EpisodesBig problem0 episodes
MetforminUrgency to Have a Bowel Movement EpisodesVery small problem4 episodes
MetforminUrgency to Have a Bowel Movement EpisodesSmall problem1 episodes
MetforminUrgency to Have a Bowel Movement EpisodesModerate problem1 episodes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026