Skip to content

Salpingectomy at Cesarean Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Reduction (SCORE)

Complete Salpingectomy Versus Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at the Time of Cesarean Delivery- a Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02374827
Acronym
SCORE
Enrollment
80
Registered
2015-03-02
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2017-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Cancer

Keywords

complete salpingectomy, standard tubal ligation, cesarean delivery, feasibility, safety, partial salpingectomy

Brief summary

To compare the feasibility and surgical outcomes between complete salpingectomy and standard postpartum tubal ligation (partial salpingectomy) at the time of cesarean delivery in women with undesired future fertility. as a possible ovarian cancer risk-reducing procedure.

Detailed description

All pregnant women receiving prenatal care within the UAB Health System, and planning to undergo tubal ligation at the time of their scheduled cesarean delivery (primary or repeat) will be approached about the study. Patients will be randomized to receive either the standard tubal ligation practice at our institution (modified Pomeroy procedure or Parkland) or a complete salpingectomy. The objective of this trial is to evaluate if a complete salpingectomy can be performed safely and comparable to a standard postpartum tubal ligation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard postpartum tubal ligation

Patients will undergo a standard postpartum tubal ligation by accepted documented surgical procedural methods (Modified Pomeroy or Parkland method)

PROCEDUREComplete Salpingectomy

Patients will undergo a complete salpingectomy by a documented surgical protocol established by accepted surgical procedural methods.

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All pregnant women \> 25 years receiving prenatal care within the UAB Health System, and planning to undergo tubal ligation at the time of their scheduled cesarean delivery (primary or repeat) * Informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to obtain informed consent * Fetal death or anomalies * Preterm delivery \< 36 weeks gestation * Immune-compromising disease * Chronic steroid use * Chronic prophylactic or therapeutic anti-coagulation * Patients no followed in our regional health system * Known BRCA mutation carrier status * Age \< 25 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to complete sterilization procedureAt time of procedureThe primary outcome will involve measuring the amount of surgical time required to complete the assigned sterilization procedure
Completion rate of sterilization procedureAt time of procedureThe primary outcome will involve assessing the completion rate of assigned sterilization procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total operative timeAt time of procedureIncludes cesarean delivery and sterilization procedure time
Mean post-operative pain scorePostpartum admission (3-4 days)
Perioperative complication rateFrom time of procedure to 6 weeks postpartumComposite assessment of the following: estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusion, intra-abdominal hemorrhage/hematoma, need for readmission, need for reoperation, need for additional surgical procedure, major post-operative complication

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026