Skip to content

Improving Balance and Mobility

Improving Balance and Mobility in Older Veterans

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02374463
Acronym
MMBI
Enrollment
41
Registered
2015-02-27
Start date
2015-06-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2020-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accidental Falls, Mobility Limitation, Postural Balance

Keywords

Balance, Fall Risk, Older Adults, Tai Chi, Multimodal Balance Intervention

Brief summary

Falls are dangerous leading to injuries and even death. The VA has made fall prevention a priority, but effective programs only reduce falls by 30%. Tai Chi, a standing exercise program, has been effective at improving balance but may not prevent falls. Most falls occur during walking when an individual experiences a slip or a trip. Programs that focus on walking, stepping, and recovery from a slip may be more effective at fall reduction. This study will compare Tai Chi to a novel multimodal balance intervention (MMBI). MMBI focuses on standing balance, walking, stepping, strength training, and recovery from a slip. The Investigators believe that the MMBI program will be more effective than Tai Chi at improving balance and preventing falls in older Veterans and the Investigators will use the results of this study to develop a larger study on fall prevention in older Veterans.

Detailed description

Background: Falls are currently the leading cause of injurious death and non-fatal injuries for adults over the age of 65. Older Veterans may be at greater risk for falls due to their high burden of medical co-morbidity. The VA has made research into fall prevention a high priority. Falls are complex with numerous deficits including impaired balance, decreased postural control, muscle weakness, and an inability to successfully negotiate environmental hazards. Tai Chi is currently considered to be one of the most effective fall prevention exercise interventions, with an endorsement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which widely influences health care policy. However, there are few studies comparing Tai Chi with another active intervention. Tai Chi may generally improve balance, decrease fall risk, and provides a general lower body strengthening. However, Tai Chi may not sufficiently improve gait and dynamic mobility and does little to target obstacle negotiation, one of the largest contributors to a fall. The majority of falls occur during walking, with slips and trips being the most common causes and targeted interventions focused on improving stepping and walking ability may be even more effective at improving balance and reducing falls. The Investigators plan to enroll 56 older (age \> 65 years) community dwelling Veterans with a history of a fall in the last year who are at high risk for a recurrent fall. After baseline testing participants will be randomized to either MMBI or a Tai Chi intervention modeled after the Tai Chi Moving for Better Balance Program. All participants will participate in a group exercise class in their assigned intervention for 1 hour, 3 times per week for 24 weeks. After the completion of 24 weeks of exercise group changes will be compared for 1) balance (4-square step test); 2) mobility and fall risk (functional gait assessment); 3) rate of falls; 4) lower extremity isometric strength testing (biodex); and 5) body composition. The investigators also plan for follow all participants for 6 months after completion of the intervention to examine differences in fall rates after the cessation of the program between the groups. Impact: This research directly benefits Veterans as it may lead to new and effective interventions that could reduce fall risk, injury-related hospitalization and death in older Veterans. MMBI is also readily exportable to the community and with minimal resources could be widely implemented at other VAs as part of standard of care, similar to Managing Overweight and/or Obesity for Veterans Everywhere! (MOVE!). Results from this SPIRE grant will be used to power a larger randomized clinical trial that will examine the effectiveness of the two interventions to reduce rate of falls and risk of falling in older Veterans at high risk for falls.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMMBI

Multimodality Balance Intervention (MMBI): Our MMBI will be held 3-times a week for an hour and will consist of a group dynamic balance class (30 minutes), a supervised obstacle course (10 minutes), and lower extremity and core strengthening (20 minutes). The group exercise classes will focus on dynamic weight shifts with an emphasis on the lateral and diagonal directions. Over the 6 months of class, the exercises will gradually increase in difficulty to challenge balance. A skilled instructor will lead each class and 1-2 assistants will be present to assist with fall risk prevention. The supervised obstacle course will focus on obstacle negotiation, gait over challenging surfaces, and moving in lateral, diagonal, and backward directions. Finally, strength training of the lower extremities and core will focus on strengthening major muscles of the lower extremity and core utilizing commonly available gym equipment, ankle weights and body weight.

BEHAVIORALTai Chi

Tai Chi Intervention: The supervised Tai Chi class will be held 3-times a week for one hour. All Tai Chi classes will be taught in a group setting by an experienced instructor. The emphasis during the class will be on standing movements, body alignment, weight shift and changes of direction. Movements will be adapted as the class progresses to increase the difficulty of weight shift and change in direction over time so that participants balance is continually challenged throughout the 6 months. Chairs or hand rails will be available for the participants to use as needed for balance recovery.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 65 years of age and older * Mobility and balance limitations as demonstrated by a self-reported fall within the past year or requiring greater than 8 seconds to complete the 4-square step test

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiovascular Risks: Poorly controlled hypertension (\>160/100); Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF); or patient report of: symptomatic angina at rest or during exercise, syncope without known resolution of cause, or a significant coronary event (such as a MI) in the past six months * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring home oxygen * Contraindications to resistance training, including a self-reported history of intracranial or retinal bleeding in the last year or Diabetes with active proliferative retinopathy * Patient report of significant spinal stenosis that would limit participation in the exercise intervention -Dementia (on medical record review or mini-mental status exam score \<24). * Non-ambulatory mobility status or a transtibial or transfemoral amputation * Other severe medical illness or condition that would preclude safe participation in the study as determined by the study team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Balance and Lateral Mobility Assessed by the Four Square Step TestThe FSST was assessed at 6 month (post) and at baseline (pre)the Four Square Step Test assesses dynamic balance and coordination through stepping forwards, sideways, and backwards in a timed fashion. The four square step test is timed in seconds. Higher scores are associated with worse outcome. Individuals with higher scores are at increased risk of falling with some using a score of 15 seconds or higher as being at high risk for falls. The minimum value one would see in young healthy populations for this test is 5 seconds. The maximum value is 60 seconds. If they are deemed unable to complete the value is not reported

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Gait AnalysisFGA ws measured at 6 months (post) and at baseline (pre)The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is designed to assess postural stability during gait. The measure is calculated by summing the scores for 10 gait related tasks. Each task is scored from 3 to 0, where 3 is the best possible performance (normal) and 0 indicates severe impairment related to the task. The best possible score is 30 and the worst possible score is 0. Higher values are associated with better outcome. A value of 22/30 and below is associated with high risk of falling in the community.
Change in Strength R Knee BiodexStrength at the R knee was assessed at 6 months (post) and at baseline (pre)Change in isometric strength R knee assessed using the biodex measured before and after intervention. Change was calculated as value at 6 months (post)-value at baseline (pre).Higher values are a better outcome
Number of Subjects Who Reported Falls6 monthsThis is the number of subjects who self-reported at least one fall, and does not include trips or near falls. This measure does not include the total number of falls as there were several participants who reported more than one fall.
Change in Strength R Hip Using BiodexStrength in the R hip was assessed at 6 months (post) and at baseline (pre)Assessment of change in strength using biodex. Higher values are associated with better outcome

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Body Fat6 monthschange in total body fat measured using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Value was calculated as value at 6 months (post) - value at baseline (pre)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Older community dwelling veterans (age \> 65 years) with evidence of balance dysfunction (Four Square Step Test \> 8 seconds) and or history of falling were recruited for this study. 41 subjects signed informed consent. 10 subjects were ineligible, 4 dropped out prior to completing baseline testing resulting in 27 subjects who were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MMBI
Multimodality Balance Intervention (MMBI)
15
Tai Chi
Tai Chi Intervention
12
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMMBITai ChiTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous74.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
75.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
75.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
% body fat37.7 % body fat
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
38.8 % body fat
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
38.2 % body fat
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
four square step test11.6 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
12.3 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
12 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
isometric strength hip46.2 newton squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
48.5 newton squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.1
47.1 newton squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3
isometric strength knee114.6 newton squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 49.8
127.4 newton squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.1
120.2 newton squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants7 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 153 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 151 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Balance and Lateral Mobility Assessed by the Four Square Step Test

the Four Square Step Test assesses dynamic balance and coordination through stepping forwards, sideways, and backwards in a timed fashion. The four square step test is timed in seconds. Higher scores are associated with worse outcome. Individuals with higher scores are at increased risk of falling with some using a score of 15 seconds or higher as being at high risk for falls. The minimum value one would see in young healthy populations for this test is 5 seconds. The maximum value is 60 seconds. If they are deemed unable to complete the value is not reported

Time frame: The FSST was assessed at 6 month (post) and at baseline (pre)

Population: the change in four square step test score is calculated as the 6 month (post) - the baseline value (pre)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MMBIBalance and Lateral Mobility Assessed by the Four Square Step Test-1.8 secondsStandard Deviation 0.9
Tai ChiBalance and Lateral Mobility Assessed by the Four Square Step Test-0.6 secondsStandard Deviation 0.3
Comparison: within group change was assessedp-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Strength R Hip Using Biodex

Assessment of change in strength using biodex. Higher values are associated with better outcome

Time frame: Strength in the R hip was assessed at 6 months (post) and at baseline (pre)

Population: Change calculated as 6 month value (post)- baseline value (pre)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MMBIChange in Strength R Hip Using Biodex10.4 newton squaredStandard Deviation 5.2
Tai ChiChange in Strength R Hip Using Biodex-10.1 newton squaredStandard Deviation 5.1
p-value: =0.3ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Strength R Knee Biodex

Change in isometric strength R knee assessed using the biodex measured before and after intervention. Change was calculated as value at 6 months (post)-value at baseline (pre).Higher values are a better outcome

Time frame: Strength at the R knee was assessed at 6 months (post) and at baseline (pre)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MMBIChange in Strength R Knee Biodex21.8 newton squaredStandard Deviation 10.5
Tai ChiChange in Strength R Knee Biodex-16.2 newton squaredStandard Deviation 8.1
p-value: =0.6ANOVA
Secondary

Functional Gait Analysis

The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is designed to assess postural stability during gait. The measure is calculated by summing the scores for 10 gait related tasks. Each task is scored from 3 to 0, where 3 is the best possible performance (normal) and 0 indicates severe impairment related to the task. The best possible score is 30 and the worst possible score is 0. Higher values are associated with better outcome. A value of 22/30 and below is associated with high risk of falling in the community.

Time frame: FGA ws measured at 6 months (post) and at baseline (pre)

Population: The change in FGA was calculated as the value at 6 months (post)- the value at baseline (pre)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MMBIFunctional Gait Analysis7.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.64
Tai ChiFunctional Gait Analysis-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
p-value: =0.08ANOVA
Secondary

Number of Subjects Who Reported Falls

This is the number of subjects who self-reported at least one fall, and does not include trips or near falls. This measure does not include the total number of falls as there were several participants who reported more than one fall.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MMBINumber of Subjects Who Reported Falls3 participants
Tai ChiNumber of Subjects Who Reported Falls3 participants
p-value: 0.84Chi-squared
p-value: =0.4Chi-squared
Other Pre-specified

Percent Body Fat

change in total body fat measured using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Value was calculated as value at 6 months (post) - value at baseline (pre)

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MMBIPercent Body Fat-0.37 percentage of body fatStandard Deviation 0.19
Tai ChiPercent Body Fat-0.1 percentage of body fatStandard Deviation 0.05
p-value: <0.05ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026