Skip to content

Nutritional Needs and Intake on Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Elderly Patients

Clinical Dietitian, Dietetic Service, Mackay Memorial Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02374203
Enrollment
190
Registered
2015-02-27
Start date
2014-12-26
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2018-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness, Elderly, Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

Indirect Calorimetry, Harris-Benedict equation, critical elderly, mNUTRIC score, high nutritional risk

Brief summary

The purposes of this study were to investigate the caloric requirement and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated critically ill elderly patients and identify those at high nutritional risk who require high protein formula intervention.

Detailed description

The elderly population is rapidly increasing, but studies on calorie requirement in critically ill elderly patients are few, and indirect calorimetry (IC) is not available in every intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to compare IC and Harris-Benedict (HB) predictive equation in different BMI (body mass index) groups. And to investigate whether the nutrition intake from EN (enteral nutrition) and PN (parenteral nutrition) created a better clinical outcome than EN alone in HNR (high nutritional risk) mechanically ventilated critically ill elderly patients.Inclusion criteria were: age ≧65 years old, APACHE Π score ≧15, mechanical ventilation ≧48 hours and on NG tube feeding. Nutritional risk was screened by mNUTRIC and GNRI. Indirect calorimetry and HB equation were used to assess energy requirements. Patients were randomized 1:1 to two tube feeding regimens: general formula and high protein formula (1.5\ 2.0 gm/kg BW). Nutritional intake from EN, the type and amount of intravenous nutrition within 7 days, tolerance to feeding, MVD (Mechanical Ventilation Day), newly diagnosed VAP (Ventilator Associated Pneumonia), ICU and hospital LOS (Length of Stay) and date of death were recorded. We used SAS version 9.4 for statistical analysis. Statistically significance was set at α=0.05.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENThigh protein enteral nutrition

supply protein over 1.5 gm/kg body weight

Sponsors

Mackay Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients were randomized 1:1 to two tube feeding regimens: general formula and high protein formula (1.5\ 2.0 gm/kg BW).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* APACHE Π score ≧ 15 * ≧ 65 years * on mechanical ventilation ≧48 hours * received EN

Exclusion criteria

* Use of total parenteral nutrition * Fasting \>5 days * Brain death * Terminal cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determination of the energy requirements in critically ill elderly patientsfirst 5 days in the ICUA total of 177 critically ill elderly patients (≧ 65 years old) underwent IC for measured resting energy expenditure (MREE). Estimated calorie requirement was calculated by the HB equation, using actual body weight (ABW) and ideal body weight (IBW) separately. Patients were divided into four BMI groups. One-way ANOVA and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analyses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Higher Enteral Nutrition Intake May Reduce Hospital Mortalityfirst 28 days in the ICUWe included patients ≧ 65 years on mechanical ventilation ≧ 48 hours and received EN. Nutritional status was evaluated by mNUTRIC score. We calculated the energy and protein requirements as Harris-Benedict equation ╳ 1.0\ 1.3 and 1.0\ 2.0 gm/kg body weight respectively. Nutrition intake from EN and PN was recorded within 7 days. ICU and hospital mortalities in HNR elderly patients who could achieve more or less 80% of the prescribed nutrition were compared.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026