Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Acellular Dermal Template for the Treatment of Full Thickness Skin Defects

A Phase 2, Intra-patient Randomised Controlled Multicentre International Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Acellular Dermal Template Novomaix for the Treatment of Full Thickness Skin Defects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02373566
Enrollment
11
Registered
2015-02-27
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Full Thickness Skin Defects

Keywords

burns, dermal substitute, scar quality, reconstruction, wound healing, wound closure

Brief summary

In this study the efficacy of an acellular dermal template (Novomaix), combined with split thickness skin grafts, for use in patients with full thickness skin defects, is tested. Results will be compared intra-patient with those obtained after conventional treatment with split thickness skin grafts. The investigators expect this treatment to provide better outcome regarding scar quality.

Detailed description

Using dermal substitutes in combination with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) is a well acknowledged therapy in burns and reconstructive surgery. Nevertheless, the ideal substitute is not available yet. We therefore want to investigate the use of an acellular dermal template (Novomaix), in combination with STSG, to treat these defects. Patients with with full thickness skin defects will be included in this study. This phase II study aims to investigate the efficacy of the use of this dermal matrix, with regard to scar quality as determined for elasticity at 3 months after treatment. Moreover, graft take (5-7 days after treatment), epithelialisation (5-7 days and 2-3 weeks), and scar quality (3 and 12 months after treatment, as determined for elasticity, colour/pigmentation, and using a subjective scar assessment scale) will be evaluated.

Interventions

Novomaix dermal substitute in combination with STSG

Sponsors

Ernst Reichmann Tissue Biology Research Unit, Zürich
CollaboratorOTHER
Seventh Framework Programme
CollaboratorOTHER
Association of Dutch Burn Centres
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

participant and assessor are both unaware of location of dermal template

Intervention model description

part of wound treated with /without dermal template

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years (for Zurich: ≤ 18 years) * Full thickness skin defects configured in such a way that two comparable and measurable areas can be grafted, both of minimally 3x3 cm * ≤ 50% TBSA full thickness skin defects at time of intervention * Informed consent by the patient and/or legal representatives.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with infected wounds * Full thickness skin wounds located in face and/or genitals will not be included * Pregnant or breast feeding females * Patients with known concomitant medical conditions that may interfere with normal wound healing (e.g. immune deficiency, HIV, uncontrolled diabetes, treatment with corticoid therapy, collagenoses, cancer) * Known allergy against porcine collagen or elastin * Patients that are expected (according to the responsible medical doctor) to be non-compliant to the study protocol. (This includes patients with severe cognitive dysfunction/impairment and severe psychiatric disorders) * Previous enrolment of the patient into the current study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scar quality as assessed for scar elasticity (experimental vs control area) as measured by Cutometer or as assessed using subjective scar assessment scale (POSAS)3 months post-operativeScar elasticity as measured by Cutometer or as assessed using subjective scar assessment scale (POSAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Graft take (Subjective assessment by experienced observer)5-7 days
Epithelialisation (Subjective assessment by experienced observer)5-7 days and 2-3 weeks post-operativeSubjective assessment by experienced observer
Scar quality (Scar elasticity as measured by Cutometer or as assessed using POSAS questionnaire)12 monthsScar elasticity as measured by Cutometer or as assessed using POSAS questionnaire
Scar quality (As determined with subjective scar assessment scale (POSAS)3 and 12 monthsAs determined with subjective scar assessment scale (POSAS)
Scar quality (As measured for scar colour and pigmentation using DSM II ColorMeter)3 and 12 monthsAs measured for scar colour and pigmentation using DSM II ColorMeter

Countries

Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026