Skip to content

Effect of Perioperative Lung Protective Strategies on the Occurrence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgery in the Prone Position

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02373475
Enrollment
78
Registered
2015-02-27
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2016-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Complications

Keywords

spine surgery, prone position, intraoperative lung protective strategies, postoperative pulmonary complications

Brief summary

Postoperative pulmonary complications are main cause of overall perioperative morbidity and mortality in the patients following general anesthesia. A protective ventilation strategy refers to the use of low VT (in the range of 4-8 ml/kg of the predicted body weight) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), with or without recruitment maneuver. Protective ventilation has been considered the optimal practice in patients suffering from the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, few human studies have assessed how to ventilate healthy lungs in patients undergoing general anesthesia, especially in prone position. Prior studies reported that in the patients undergoing major abdominal surgery in supine position, intraoperative lung protective ventilator settings had the potential to protect against pulmonary complications. Therefore, the investigators planned this study to better specify the effect of intraoperative protective ventilation in surgical patients in the prone position.

Interventions

Conventional ventilation with TV of 10 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during the surgery under general anesthesia

OTHERProtective lung ventilation

Protective lung ventilation with TV of 6 mL/kg PBW, PEEP of 6 cmH2O and recruitment maneuver during the surgery under general anesthesia

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* the patient undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery of two hours or more in the prone position * the age: 19 yrs and older * the patients had a preoperative risk index for pulmonary complications of more than 2.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with altered mental status or increased intracranial pressure * Body mass index more than 35 kg/m2 * Patients with persistent hemodynamic instability or intractable shock * Severe cardiac disease defined as New York Heart Association class III or IV or acute coronary syndrome or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmias * Recent history of invasive ventilation (within two weeks) * Recent history of pneumonia, ALI/ARDS or sepsis (within two weeks) * History of pulmonary resection, emphysema or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) * Repeated systemic corticosteroid therapy for acute exacerbations of COPD or asthma * Recent immunosuppressive medication defined as need of chemotherapy or radiation therapy (within two months) * History of neuromuscular disease * Emergency operation * Patient refusal * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
forced vital capacity (FVC)3 days after the spine surgeryThe changes in the pulmonary functional tests \[forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)\].Pulmonary functional tests were performed at the bedside by using a spirometer while the patients in a seated, comfortable position.
forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)3 days after the spine surgeryThe changes in the pulmonary functional tests \[forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)\].Pulmonary functional tests were performed at the bedside by using a spirometer while the patients in a seated, comfortable position.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026