Skip to content

Phase 3 Study of Pexidartinib for Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCT-TS)

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study of Orally Administered PLX3397 in Subjects With Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02371369
Acronym
ENLIVEN
Enrollment
120
Registered
2015-02-25
Start date
2015-05-11
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2022-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis, Giant Cell Tumors of the Tendon Sheath, Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor

Keywords

PLX3397, Pexidartinib, Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF-1R) inhibitor

Brief summary

This is a Phase 3 clinical study, which aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an investigational drug called pexidartinib for the treatment of certain tumors for which surgical removal could cause more harm than good. The main purpose of this study is to gather information about the investigational drug pexidartinib, which may help to treat tumors of pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) or giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (GCT-TS). The study consists of two parts with a follow-up period. In Part 1, eligible study participants will be assigned to receive either pexidartinib or matching placebo for 24 weeks. A number of assessments will be carried out during the course of the study, including physical examinations, blood tests, imaging studies, electrocardiograms, and questionnaires. MRI scans will be used to evaluate the response of the tumors to the treatment. Some subjects, assigned to placebo in Part 1 transitioned to pexidartinib for Part 2. Then a protocol amendment was written to allow only pexidartinib patients to continue into Part 2. Part 2 is a long-term treatment phase in which all participants receive open-label pexidartinib. There was also a follow-up period added to Part 2.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo capsule matching pexidartinib capsule for oral administration

Each capsule contains 200 mg of pexidartinib for oral administration

Sponsors

Daiichi Sankyo
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) in Part 1, Open-label (no masking) in Part 2

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years. 2. A diagnosis of PVNS or GCT-TS (i) that has been histologically confirmed either by a pathologist at the treating institution or a central pathologist, and (ii) where surgical resection would be associated with potentially worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity (locally advanced disease), with morbidity determined consensually by qualified personnel (eg, two surgeons or a multi-disciplinary tumor board). 3. Measurable disease of at least 2 cm and otherwise based on RECIST 1.1, assessed from MRI scans by a central radiologist. 4. Symptomatic disease because of active PVNS or GCT-TS, defined as one or more of the following: 1. a worst pain of at least 4 at any time during the week preceding the Screening Visit (based on scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing pain as bad as you can imagine). 2. a worst stiffness of at least 4 at any time during the week preceding the Screening Visit (based on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing stiffness as bad as you can imagine). 5. Stable prescription of analgesic regimen during the 2 weeks prior to randomization. 6. During the 2 weeks prior to randomization, at least 4 of 7 consecutive days of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) items and Worst Stiffness NRS items completed correctly. 7. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within the 14-day period prior to randomization. (Where demanded by local regulations, this test may be required within 72 hours of randomization.) 8. Males and females of childbearing potential are permitted in the study so long as they consent to avoid getting their partner pregnant or becoming pregnant, respectively, by using a highly effective contraception method, as described below, throughout the study and for up to 90 days after completion. Highly effective methods of contraception include: intra-uterine device (non-hormonal or hormonal), bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomy, sexual abstinence, or barrier methods (eg, condom, diaphragm) used in combination with hormonal methods associated with inhibition of ovulation. Women of non-childbearing potential may be included if they are either surgically sterile or have been postmenopausal for ≥ 1 year. Women who have documentation of at least 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea and have a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level \> 40 milli-International units (mIU/mL) will be considered postmenopausal. 9. Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function, defined by: * Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 × 10\^9/L * aspartate aminotransferase/alanine (AST/ALT) ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) * Hemoglobin \> 10 g/dL * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN * Platelet count ≥ 100 × 10\^9/L * Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN 10. Willingness and ability to complete the Worst Pain NRS item, Worst Stiffness NRS item, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale, and other self-assessment instruments throughout the study. 11. Willingness and ability to use an electronic diary. 12. Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures and to comply with all study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

1. Investigational drug use within 28 days of randomization. 2. Previous use of pexidartinib or any biologic treatment targeting CSF-1 or the CSF-1R; previous use of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors, eg, imatinib or nilotinib, are allowed. 3. Active cancer (either concurrent or within the last year of starting study treatment) that requires therapy (eg, surgical, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy), with the exception of adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, melanoma in-situ, carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or breast, or prostate carcinoma with a prostate-specific antigen value \<0.2 ng/mL. 4. Known metastatic PVNS/GCT-TS. 5. Active or chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus or known active or chronic infection with human immunodeficiency virus. 6. Known active tuberculosis. 7. Significant concomitant arthropathy in the affected joint, serious illness, uncontrolled infection, or a medical or psychiatric history that, in the Investigator's opinion, would likely interfere with the person's study participation or the interpretation of his or her results. 8. Women who are breastfeeding. 9. A screening Fridericia corrected QT interval (QTcF) ≥ 450 ms (men) or ≥ 470 ms (women). 10. MRI contraindications. 11. History of hypersensitivity to any excipients in the investigational product. 12. Inability to swallow capsules.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25Week 25Complete response (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25at Week 9 , Week 17, and Week 25The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes.
Percentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25Week 25The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the worst pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionBy Week 96Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined as the date of the first recorded response to the first date of documented disease progression. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed.
Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreBy Week 120Tumor Volume Score (TVS) is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed.
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months)Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression.
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS)Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months)Duration of response (DOR) based on TVS is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAfter the first dose of treatment up to 28 days after the last doseTreatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events that started or worsened after the first dose of treatment and within 28 days after the last dose. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade adverse events. Any Grade and Grade ≥3 (severe) TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were coded using MedDRA version 17.1.
Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Baseline, Week 13, and Week 25Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses.
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25Week 25Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were assessed using tumor volume score (TVS). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference. TVS is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor.
Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Baseline, Week 9, Week 17, and Week 25The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49By Week 49The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes.
Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline, Week 25, and Week 49The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine).
Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49By Week 49The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the worst pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49By Week 49Best overall response (CR or PR) was assessed using tumor volume score (TVS) in the ITT population. Tumor Volume Score is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor.
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49By Week 49Complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference.
Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49By Week 49Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Part 1 was a double-blind, randomized, Pexidartinib or placebo in participants with symptomatic TGCT for whom surgical resection would be associated with potentially worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity. Part 2 is a long-term treatment phase in which all eligible participants received open-label Pexidartinib.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Screening procedures were performed after consent was obtained and within the 42 days before the first dose of study drug, unless otherwise noted.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2
Participants received Pexidartinib,1000 mg (5 capsules per day ) for 2 weeks, then 800 mg (4 capsules per day) for 22 weeks in Part 1 of study. Eligible participants from this group also received Pexidartinib in Part 2 at their prescribed dose. Pexidartinib: Each capsule contains 200 mg of pexidartinib for oral administration
61
Placebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2
Participants received treatment of matching placebo (5 capsules per day) for 2 weeks, then matching placebo (4 capsules per day) for 22 weeks in Part 1 of study. Eligible participants from this group also received Pexidartinib in Part 2 at their prescribed dose. Placebo: Placebo capsule matching pexidartinib capsule for oral administration. Pexidartinib: Each capsule contains 200 mg of pexidartinib for oral administration (Part 2).
59
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Part 1Adverse Event80
Part 1Disease progression01
Part 1Physician Decision03
Part 1Protocol Violation01
Part 1Withdrawal by Subject16
Part 2Adverse Event65
Part 2Death01
Part 2Disease progression10
Part 2Investigator decision12
Part 2Lost to Follow-up11
Part 2Other01
Part 2Subject Noncompliance10
Part 2Subject transitioned to another DS pexidartinib protocol159
Part 2Subject transitioned to commercial supply64
Part 2Surgical resection of tumor11
Part 2Withdrawal by Subject166

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2TotalPlacebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
57 Participants113 Participants56 Participants
Age, Continuous44.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
52 Participants106 Participants54 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
5 participants12 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 participants5 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
1 participants3 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
2 participants7 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
4 participants6 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
8 participants17 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
7 participants11 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
2 participants2 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
5 participants8 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants45 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants71 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants49 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 610 / 590 / 611 / 301 / 91
other
Total, other adverse events
60 / 6155 / 5961 / 6130 / 3091 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 611 / 5912 / 619 / 3021 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25

Complete response (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference.

Time frame: Week 25

Population: Best overall response was assessed in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25Complete Response (CR)14.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25Partial Response (PR)24.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25Response (CR or PR)39.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25Complete Response (CR)0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25Partial Response (PR)0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25Response (CR or PR)0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Treatment comparison between the pexidartinib and placebo groups at Week 25p-value: <0.0001Fisher's Exact Test
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1

Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression.

Time frame: Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months)

Population: DOR was assessed in the ITT population, specifically among the Pexidartinib Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; Pexidartinib Part 2 only. Participants randomized to Placebo Part 1 only were not analyzed. DOR was based on numbers of responders only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pexidartinib Part 1Duration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1NA months
Placebo Part 1Duration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1NA months
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS)

Duration of response (DOR) based on TVS is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression.

Time frame: Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months)

Population: DOR was assessed in the ITT population, specifically among the Pexidartinib Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; Pexidartinib Part 2 only. Participants randomized to Placebo Part 1 only were not analyzed. DOR was based on numbers of responders only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pexidartinib Part 1Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS)52.70 months
Placebo Part 1Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS)NA months
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 13, and Week 25

Population: Range of motion was assessed in the ITT population in participants where data were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 1313.0 degreesStandard Error 2.3
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 2515.1 degreesStandard Error 2.1
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Baseline62.5 degreesStandard Error 3.2
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Baseline62.9 degreesStandard Error 2.9
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 134.8 degreesStandard Error 2.6
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 256.2 degreesStandard Error 2.4
Comparison: Treatment comparison between the pexidartinib and placebo groups at Week 25p-value: 0.0043Fisher's Exact Test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 9, Week 17, and Week 25

Population: Worst stiffness was assessed in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Baseline5.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 9-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 17-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 25-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 25-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Baseline5.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 17-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 9-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Comparison: Treatment comparison between the pexidartinib and placebo groups at Week 25p-value: <0.0001Mixed effects model for repeated measure
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame: at Week 9 , Week 17, and Week 25

Population: Physical function was assessed in the ITT population in participants where data were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 92.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 173.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 254.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 9-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 170.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25Week 25-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Comparison: Treatment comparison between pexidartinib and placebo groups at Week 25p-value: 0.0019Mixed effects model for repeated measure
Secondary

Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression

Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined as the date of the first recorded response to the first date of documented disease progression. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed.

Time frame: By Week 96

Population: The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression were assessed in the ITT population, specifically among the Pexidartinib Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; Pexidartinib Part 2 only, All Pexidartinib Treated participants, . Participants randomized to Placebo Part 1 only were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 72 (Day 504); Without disease progression9 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 24 (Day 168); With disease progression0 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 96 (Day 672); Without disease progression2 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 48 (Day 336); With disease progression1 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 48 (Day 336); Without disease progression15 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionNumber of responses23 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 12 (Day 84); With disease progression0 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 12 (Day 84); Without disease progression23 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 72 (Day 504); With disease progression1 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 24 (Day 168); Without disease progression23 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 96 (Day 672); With disease progression1 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 48 (Day 336); Without disease progression9 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionNumber of responses12 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 12 (Day 84); Without disease progression12 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 12 (Day 84); With disease progression0 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 24 (Day 168); Without disease progression12 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 24 (Day 168); With disease progression0 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 48 (Day 336); With disease progression0 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 72 (Day 504); Without disease progression3 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 72 (Day 504); With disease progression0 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 96 (Day 672); Without disease progression1 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 96 (Day 672); With disease progression0 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 96 (Day 672); Without disease progression3 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 72 (Day 504); Without disease progression12 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 12 (Day 84); With disease progression0 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionNumber of responses35 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 72 (Day 504); With disease progression1 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 12 (Day 84); Without disease progression35 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 48 (Day 336); Without disease progression24 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 24 (Day 168); With disease progression0 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 96 (Day 672); With disease progression1 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 48 (Day 336); With disease progression1 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease ProgressionWeek 24 (Day 168); Without disease progression35 participants
Secondary

Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume Score

Tumor Volume Score (TVS) is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed.

Time frame: By Week 120

Population: The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed in the ITT population, specifically among the Pexidartinib Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; Pexidartinib Part 2 only; and All Pexidartinib Treated participants. Participants who received Placebo Part 1 only were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 120 (Day 840); Without disease progression1 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 72 (Day 504); With disease progression3 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 48 (Day 336); Without disease progression22 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 12 (Day 84); With disease progression0 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 72 (Day 504); Without disease progression13 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 48 (Day 336); With disease progression3 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreNumber of responders34 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 12 (Day 84); Without disease progression33 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 96 (Day 672); With disease progression3 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 24 (Day 168); Without disease progression32 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 120 (Day 840); With disease progression3 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 96 (Day 672); Without disease progression3 participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 24 (Day 168); With disease progression0 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 48 (Day 336); With disease progression1 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreNumber of responders18 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 12 (Day 84); Without disease progression18 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 12 (Day 84); With disease progression0 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 24 (Day 168); Without disease progression18 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 24 (Day 168); With disease progression0 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 48 (Day 336); Without disease progression13 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 72 (Day 504); Without disease progression3 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 72 (Day 504); With disease progression1 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 96 (Day 672); Without disease progression1 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 96 (Day 672); With disease progression1 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 120 (Day 840); Without disease progression0 participants
Placebo Part 1Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 120 (Day 840); With disease progression1 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 72 (Day 504); With disease progression4 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 24 (Day 168); Without disease progression50 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 120 (Day 840); Without disease progression1 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 96 (Day 672); Without disease progression4 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 12 (Day 84); With disease progression0 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreNumber of responders52 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 96 (Day 672); With disease progression4 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 48 (Day 336); With disease progression4 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 48 (Day 336); Without disease progression35 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 12 (Day 84); Without disease progression51 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 72 (Day 504); Without disease progression16 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 24 (Day 168); With disease progression0 participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume ScoreWeek 120 (Day 840); With disease progression4 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred Term

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events that started or worsened after the first dose of treatment and within 28 days after the last dose. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade adverse events. Any Grade and Grade ≥3 (severe) TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were coded using MedDRA version 17.1.

Time frame: After the first dose of treatment up to 28 days after the last dose

Population: All safety events were assessed in the Safety Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Abdominal Pain16.4 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hair color changes0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis9.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash maculopapular9.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash maculopapular0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis generalized8.2 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis generalized0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Erythema1.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Erythema0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry skin3.3 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry skin0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Photosensitivity reaction0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Photosensitivity reaction0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Nausea37.7 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Nausea0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Diarrhea19.7 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Diarrhea0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Vomiting19.7 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Vomiting1.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hair color changes67.2 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Abdominal Pain0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry mouth9.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry mouth0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Constipation11.5 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Constipation0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Stomatitis6.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Stomatitis0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Fatigue54.1 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Fatigue0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Edema peripheral13.1 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Edema peripheral0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Face edema13.1 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Face edema0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Asthenia9.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Asthenia0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pyrexia6.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥ Pyrexia0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny AST increased39.3 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 AST increased9.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALT increased27.9 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALT increased9.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALP increased14.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALP increased6.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny LDH increased11.5 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 LDH increased1.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Weight increased3.3 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Weight increased0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dysgeusia24.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dysgeusia0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Headache19.7 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Headache0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dizziness9.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dizziness1.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Paresthesia1.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Paresthesia0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Memory impairment0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Memory impairment0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Arthralgia23.0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Arthralgia3.3 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pain in extremity6.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pain in extremity0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Periorbital edema18.0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Periorbital edema1.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Eyelid edema3.3 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Eyelid edema0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Decreased appetite16.4 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Decreased appetite0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hypertension14.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hypertension4.9 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Upper respiratory tract infection1.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Upper respiratory tract infection0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Cough4.9 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Cough0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dyspnea1.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dyspnea0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Insomnia4.9 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Insomnia0 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash14.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash1.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Decreased appetite0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Face edema1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis generalized0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Weight increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Cough0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 LDH increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Face edema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Abdominal Pain10.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny LDH increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALP increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALP increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Asthenia5.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Diarrhea0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALT increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Cough5.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash5.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Asthenia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis generalized0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALT increased1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 AST increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Upper respiratory tract infection0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pyrexia1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Eyelid edema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny AST increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥ Pyrexia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hypertension10.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Abdominal Pain0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Nausea0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash maculopapular0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash maculopapular1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Photosensitivity reaction0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry mouth3.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Photosensitivity reaction0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis3.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hair color changes0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry mouth0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry skin0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Eyelid edema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hair color changes3.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Periorbital edema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Constipation5.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Vomiting5.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Periorbital edema1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pain in extremity1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Insomnia3.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Constipation0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Nausea40.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pain in extremity6.8 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hypertension0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Stomatitis1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Decreased appetite10.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Arthralgia1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Arthralgia25.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry skin3.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Stomatitis0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Insomnia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Memory impairment0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Memory impairment1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dyspnea0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Fatigue35.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Vomiting0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Paresthesia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Paresthesia1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dizziness0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Fatigue0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Diarrhea25.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dizziness15.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Headache0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dyspnea0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Edema peripheral3.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Erythema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Headache18.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dysgeusia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Upper respiratory tract infection0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Edema peripheral0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Erythema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dysgeusia1.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Weight increased0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Upper respiratory tract infection11.5 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Diarrhea26.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Decreased appetite0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Diarrhea0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Vomiting23.0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Vomiting1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Abdominal Pain21.3 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Abdominal Pain0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hypertension19.7 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry mouth13.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry mouth0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Constipation14.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Constipation0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Stomatitis8.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hypertension4.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Stomatitis0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Fatigue55.7 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Fatigue0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Edema peripheral16.4 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Edema peripheral0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Face edema14.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Face edema1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Asthenia11.5 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Asthenia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pyrexia8.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Upper respiratory tract infection0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥ Pyrexia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny AST increased44.3 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 AST increased9.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash27.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALT increased31.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALT increased9.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Cough6.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALP increased14.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALP increased6.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny LDH increased11.5 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 LDH increased1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Weight increased4.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Cough0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Weight increased0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dysgeusia27.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dysgeusia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Headache23.0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Headache1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dyspnea4.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dizziness13.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dizziness1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Paresthesia8.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Paresthesia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Memory impairment1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dyspnea0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Memory impairment0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Arthralgia27.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Arthralgia3.3 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pain in extremity9.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pain in extremity0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Insomnia4.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Periorbital edema24.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Periorbital edema1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hair color changes73.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hair color changes0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Eyelid edema4.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis16.4 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash maculopapular14.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash maculopapular1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis generalized8.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Eyelid edema0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis generalized0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Erythema3.3 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Erythema0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry skin6.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry skin0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Decreased appetite18.0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Photosensitivity reaction1.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Photosensitivity reaction0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Nausea44.3 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Insomnia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Nausea0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dizziness13.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Memory impairment10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Headache20.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hair color changes83.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dyspnea10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry mouth0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hypertension30.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Stomatitis0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hair color changes0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dysgeusia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Memory impairment0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Vomiting0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Nausea0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis20.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dyspnea0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Eyelid edema10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry mouth13.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Photosensitivity reaction10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dizziness0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Arthralgia30.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Eyelid edema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash maculopapular10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Erythema20.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Decreased appetite10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Stomatitis10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Abdominal Pain0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥ Pyrexia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry skin10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Upper respiratory tract infection0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pyrexia13.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Diarrhea0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny AST increased16.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Arthralgia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Headache0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Paresthesia10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash maculopapular0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 AST increased6.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Constipation0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dysgeusia23.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Asthenia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pain in extremity13.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALT increased23.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Edema peripheral20.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Fatigue26.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Asthenia20.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Abdominal Pain6.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALT increased10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Erythema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Diarrhea30.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Vomiting6.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis generalized10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALP increased3.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pain in extremity0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Cough10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Paresthesia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Decreased appetite0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALP increased3.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Constipation10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Nausea20.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Face edema3.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Photosensitivity reaction0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny LDH increased10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Periorbital edema13.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash23.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Upper respiratory tract infection3.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Insomnia0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 LDH increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Fatigue0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Insomnia10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Face edema20.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hypertension6.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Weight increased10.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry skin3.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis generalized0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Periorbital edema0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Edema peripheral0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Weight increased0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Cough0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Weight increased0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dysgeusia26.4 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Cough0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Edema peripheral17.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Vomiting1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dysgeusia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash26.4 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Decreased appetite15.4 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Headache22.0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Fatigue0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Headache1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Erythema8.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Eyelid edema0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dizziness13.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hypertension5.5 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dizziness1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dyspnea7.7 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Fatigue46.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Diarrhea27.5 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Paresthesia8.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Paresthesia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Stomatitis0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Erythema0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Memory impairment4.4 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Decreased appetite0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Vomiting17.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Memory impairment0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Stomatitis8.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Nausea0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Arthralgia28.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dyspnea0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Arthralgia2.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Constipation0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry skin7.7 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pain in extremity11.0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Insomnia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Constipation13.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pain in extremity0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Periorbital edema20.0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hypertension13.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Periorbital edema1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Insomnia6.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry mouth0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Dry skin1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Hair color changes76.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Nausea36.3 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Hair color changes0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Diarrhea0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Dry mouth13.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis17.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Eyelid edema6.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Abdominal Pain0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Photosensitivity reaction4.4 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Rash maculopapular13.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pyrexia9.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥ Pyrexia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny AST increased35.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Upper respiratory tract infection0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Asthenia0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 AST increased8.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Rash maculopapular1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Abdominal Pain16.5 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALT increased28.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Asthenia14.3 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALT increased9.9 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Upper respiratory tract infection8.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny ALP increased11.0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Face edema2.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Pruritis generalized8.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 ALP increased5.5 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Cough7.7 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny LDH increased11.0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 LDH increased1.1 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Face edema16.5 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Photosensitivity reaction0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermAny Weight increased6.6 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Edema peripheral0 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred TermGrade ≥3 Pruritis generalized0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the worst pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame: Week 25

Population: Worst pain was assessed in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 2531.1 percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 2515.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25

Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were assessed using tumor volume score (TVS). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference. TVS is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor.

Time frame: Week 25

Population: Best overall response was assessed in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25Complete Response (CR)4.9 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25Partial Response (PR)50.8 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25Response (CR or PR)55.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25Complete Response (CR)0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25Partial Response (PR)0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25Response (CR or PR)0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Treatment comparison between the pexidartinib and placebo groups at Week 25p-value: <0.0001Fisher's Exact Test
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses.

Time frame: By Week 49

Population: Range of Motion (ROM) was assessed in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 2515.6 degreesStandard Deviation 14.9
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline62.5 degreesStandard Deviation 24.8
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 4914.4 degreesStandard Deviation 19.5
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 2513.1 degreesStandard Deviation 12.9
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline66.5 degreesStandard Deviation 22.9
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 4912.0 degreesStandard Deviation 13.4
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline63.8 degreesStandard Deviation 24.2
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 4913.4 degreesStandard Deviation 17.3
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 2514.8 degreesStandard Deviation 14.2
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the worst pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame: By Week 49

Population: Worst pain was assessed in the ITT population, specifically among the Pexidartinib Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; and All Pexidartinib Treated participants. Participants who received Placebo Part 1 only or Pexidartinib Part 2 only were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 25-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 49-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 25-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 49-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 49-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 25-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 25, and Week 49

Population: Worst stiffness was assessed in the ITT population, specifically among the Pexidartinib Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; and All Pexidartinib Treated participants. Participants who received Placebo Part 1 only or Pexidartinib Part 2 only were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 25-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 49-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 25-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 49-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Baseline5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 49-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 25-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame: By Week 49

Population: Physical function was assessed in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 253.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Pexidartinib Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 494.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 254.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo Part 1Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 497.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 254.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
All Pexidartinib TreatedMean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49Week 495.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

Best overall response (CR or PR) was assessed using tumor volume score (TVS) in the ITT population. Tumor Volume Score is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor.

Time frame: By Week 49

Population: Best overall response on Tumor Volume Score was assessed in the ITT population, specifically among the Pexidartinib Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2; and All Pexidartinib Treated participants. Participants who received Placebo Part 1 only or Pexidartinib Part 2 only were not analyzed..

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 4963.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 4966.7 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 4964.8 Percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49

Complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference.

Time frame: By Week 49

Population: Best overall response was assessed in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Partial Response (PR)29.5 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Complete Response (CR)24.6 Percentage of participants
Pexidartinib Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Response (CR or PR)54.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Partial Response (PR)30.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Complete Response (CR)23.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Part 1Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Response (CR or PR)53.3 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Complete Response (CR)24.2 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Response (CR or PR)53.8 Percentage of participants
All Pexidartinib TreatedPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49Partial Response (PR)29.7 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026