Tinnitus
Conditions
Keywords
tinnitus treatment, internet-intervention, CBT
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom
Detailed description
Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed in Europe to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK). It furthermore, aims to establish for which subgroups of tinnitus suffers this iCBT intervention would be a suitable intervention. Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), with a one year follow-up design will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress Setting: This will be an internet-based study for adults with tinnitus living in the UK Participants: Eligible participants will include adults with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months with internet access and no major medical or psychiatric conditions. 70 participants will be recruited for each group and will be randomly assigned using a computer generated randomization schedule by an independent research assistant after being pre-stratified for age and tinnitus severity. Intervention: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt. Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life. Hypothesis: If this intervention proves feasible it is and effective, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.
Interventions
The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Participant's eligibility for the study is as follows: 1. Aged 18 years and over living in the UK 2. The ability to read and type in English 3. No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems) 4. Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these 5. Commitment to completing the programme 6. Completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires 7. Agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups 8. Understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same 9. Be available for 12 months after starting the study to complete a 1 year follow-up questionnaire 10. Suffering with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months 11. Tinnitus outcome measure scores indicating the need for tinnitus care (26 or above on the Tinnitus Functional Index)
Exclusion criteria
1. Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions 2. Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically 3. Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation 4. Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Tinnitus Functional Index | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Insomnia Severity Index | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Measure of sleep problems Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
| Cognitive Failures Questionnaire | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
| Satisfaction With Life | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
| Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Measure of tinnitus severity to use as a weekly measure Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI-S Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
| Generalised Anxiety Disorder | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
| Hyperacusis Questionnaire | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
| Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
| Patient Health Questionnaire | Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention | Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales |
Countries
United Kingdom
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Experimental Group CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt. | 73 |
| Weekly check-in Group will complete weekly measures and commence the treatment once the experimental group completes the intervention | 73 |
| Total | 146 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Experimental Group | Weekly check-in Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 55.57 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.86 | 56.82 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.15 | 54.31 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | 0 Participants | — | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 70 Participants | 30 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 76 Participants | 43 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Tinnitus Severity at baseline | 59.5 Score on a scale (0-100) STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4 | 59.8 Score on a scale (0-100) STANDARD_DEVIATION 18 | 59.2 Score on a scale (0-100) STANDARD_DEVIATION 19 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 73 | 0 / 73 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 73 | 0 / 73 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 73 | 0 / 73 |
Outcome results
The Tinnitus Functional Index
Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: Intention to treat paradigm
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | The Tinnitus Functional Index | Baseline score | 59.79 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.95 |
| Experimental Group | The Tinnitus Functional Index | 8 weeks Post treatment score | 38.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.26 |
| Control Group | The Tinnitus Functional Index | Baseline score | 59.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.96 |
| Control Group | The Tinnitus Functional Index | 8 weeks Post treatment score | 53.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.38 |
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: Intention to treat analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Cognitive Failures Questionnaire | Baseline score | 38.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.67 |
| Experimental Group | Cognitive Failures Questionnaire | 8 weeks post intervention score | 39.97 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.34 |
| Control Group | Cognitive Failures Questionnaire | Baseline score | 44.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.34 |
| Control Group | Cognitive Failures Questionnaire | 8 weeks post intervention score | 41.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.73 |
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: intention to treat anlaysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Generalised Anxiety Disorder | Post-intervention | 5.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.21 |
| Experimental Group | Generalised Anxiety Disorder | Baseline | 7.58 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.51 |
| Control Group | Generalised Anxiety Disorder | Post-intervention | 6.87 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.85 |
| Control Group | Generalised Anxiety Disorder | Baseline | 7.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.64 |
Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version
Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: Intention to treat analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version | 8 week sPost-intervention | 15.31 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.13 |
| Experimental Group | Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version | Baseline Score | 17.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.71 |
| Control Group | Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version | 8 week sPost-intervention | 17.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.47 |
| Control Group | Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version | Baseline Score | 18.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.06 |
Hyperacusis Questionnaire
Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: Intention to treat analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Hyperacusis Questionnaire | Post-intervention | 16.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Experimental Group | Hyperacusis Questionnaire | Baseline | 19.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.82 |
| Control Group | Hyperacusis Questionnaire | Post-intervention | 19.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.78 |
| Control Group | Hyperacusis Questionnaire | Baseline | 19.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.19 |
Insomnia Severity Index
Measure of sleep problems Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: Intention to treat analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Insomnia Severity Index | Baseline | 12.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Experimental Group | Insomnia Severity Index | 8 weeks Post-intervention | 8.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.83 |
| Control Group | Insomnia Severity Index | Baseline | 13.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.16 |
| Control Group | Insomnia Severity Index | 8 weeks Post-intervention | 12.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.21 |
Patient Health Questionnaire
Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: Intention to treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Patient Health Questionnaire | 8 weeks Post-intervention | 5.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.13 |
| Experimental Group | Patient Health Questionnaire | Baseline | 7.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.56 |
| Control Group | Patient Health Questionnaire | 8 weeks Post-intervention | 7.75 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.22 |
| Control Group | Patient Health Questionnaire | Baseline | 8.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.92 |
Satisfaction With Life
Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: Intention to treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Satisfaction With Life | 8 weeks Post-intervention | 18.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.73 |
| Experimental Group | Satisfaction With Life | Baseline Score | 16.77 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.31 |
| Control Group | Satisfaction With Life | 8 weeks Post-intervention | 16.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.29 |
| Control Group | Satisfaction With Life | Baseline Score | 16.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.03 |
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version
Measure of tinnitus severity to use as a weekly measure Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI-S Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Population: Intention to treat analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version | Baseline | 22.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.23 |
| Experimental Group | Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version | 8 weeks Post-intervention | 14.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.79 |
| Control Group | Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version | Baseline | 23.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.86 |
| Control Group | Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version | 8 weeks Post-intervention | 20.68 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.96 |