Skip to content

A CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom

CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom: A Randomise Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02370810
Enrollment
146
Registered
2015-02-25
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2021-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Keywords

tinnitus treatment, internet-intervention, CBT

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom

Detailed description

Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed in Europe to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK). It furthermore, aims to establish for which subgroups of tinnitus suffers this iCBT intervention would be a suitable intervention. Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), with a one year follow-up design will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress Setting: This will be an internet-based study for adults with tinnitus living in the UK Participants: Eligible participants will include adults with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months with internet access and no major medical or psychiatric conditions. 70 participants will be recruited for each group and will be randomly assigned using a computer generated randomization schedule by an independent research assistant after being pre-stratified for age and tinnitus severity. Intervention: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt. Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life. Hypothesis: If this intervention proves feasible it is and effective, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.

Interventions

The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.

Sponsors

Linkoeping University
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Anglia Ruskin University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Participant's eligibility for the study is as follows: 1. Aged 18 years and over living in the UK 2. The ability to read and type in English 3. No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems) 4. Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these 5. Commitment to completing the programme 6. Completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires 7. Agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups 8. Understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same 9. Be available for 12 months after starting the study to complete a 1 year follow-up questionnaire 10. Suffering with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months 11. Tinnitus outcome measure scores indicating the need for tinnitus care (26 or above on the Tinnitus Functional Index)

Exclusion criteria

1. Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions 2. Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically 3. Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation 4. Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Tinnitus Functional IndexAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionMeasure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insomnia Severity IndexAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionMeasure of sleep problems Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Cognitive Failures QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionMeasure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Satisfaction With LifeAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionQuality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening VersionAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionMeasure of tinnitus severity to use as a weekly measure Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI-S Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Generalised Anxiety DisorderAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionMeasure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Hyperacusis QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionMeasure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening VersionAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionMeasure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Patient Health QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-interventionMeasure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental Group
CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt. CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
73
Weekly check-in Group
will complete weekly measures and commence the treatment once the experimental group completes the intervention
73
Total146

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalExperimental GroupWeekly check-in Group
Age, Continuous55.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.86
56.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.15
54.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants30 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
76 Participants43 Participants33 Participants
Tinnitus Severity at baseline59.5 Score on a scale (0-100)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4
59.8 Score on a scale (0-100)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
59.2 Score on a scale (0-100)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 730 / 73
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 730 / 73
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 730 / 73

Outcome results

Primary

The Tinnitus Functional Index

Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat paradigm

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupThe Tinnitus Functional IndexBaseline score59.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.95
Experimental GroupThe Tinnitus Functional Index8 weeks Post treatment score38.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.26
Control GroupThe Tinnitus Functional IndexBaseline score59.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.96
Control GroupThe Tinnitus Functional Index8 weeks Post treatment score53.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.38
Secondary

Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupCognitive Failures QuestionnaireBaseline score38.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.67
Experimental GroupCognitive Failures Questionnaire8 weeks post intervention score39.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.34
Control GroupCognitive Failures QuestionnaireBaseline score44.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.34
Control GroupCognitive Failures Questionnaire8 weeks post intervention score41.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.73
Secondary

Generalised Anxiety Disorder

Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: intention to treat anlaysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupGeneralised Anxiety DisorderPost-intervention5.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.21
Experimental GroupGeneralised Anxiety DisorderBaseline7.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.51
Control GroupGeneralised Anxiety DisorderPost-intervention6.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.85
Control GroupGeneralised Anxiety DisorderBaseline7.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.64
Secondary

Hearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version

Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupHearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version8 week sPost-intervention15.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.13
Experimental GroupHearing Handicap Inventory- Screening VersionBaseline Score17.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.71
Control GroupHearing Handicap Inventory- Screening Version8 week sPost-intervention17.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.47
Control GroupHearing Handicap Inventory- Screening VersionBaseline Score18.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Secondary

Hyperacusis Questionnaire

Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupHyperacusis QuestionnairePost-intervention16.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Experimental GroupHyperacusis QuestionnaireBaseline19.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.82
Control GroupHyperacusis QuestionnairePost-intervention19.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
Control GroupHyperacusis QuestionnaireBaseline19.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.19
Secondary

Insomnia Severity Index

Measure of sleep problems Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupInsomnia Severity IndexBaseline12.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Experimental GroupInsomnia Severity Index8 weeks Post-intervention8.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.83
Control GroupInsomnia Severity IndexBaseline13.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.16
Control GroupInsomnia Severity Index8 weeks Post-intervention12.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.21
Secondary

Patient Health Questionnaire

Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupPatient Health Questionnaire8 weeks Post-intervention5.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
Experimental GroupPatient Health QuestionnaireBaseline7.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.56
Control GroupPatient Health Questionnaire8 weeks Post-intervention7.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.22
Control GroupPatient Health QuestionnaireBaseline8.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.92
Secondary

Satisfaction With Life

Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupSatisfaction With Life8 weeks Post-intervention18.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.73
Experimental GroupSatisfaction With LifeBaseline Score16.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
Control GroupSatisfaction With Life8 weeks Post-intervention16.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.29
Control GroupSatisfaction With LifeBaseline Score16.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.03
Secondary

Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version

Measure of tinnitus severity to use as a weekly measure Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI-S Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupTinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening VersionBaseline22.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
Experimental GroupTinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version8 weeks Post-intervention14.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.79
Control GroupTinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening VersionBaseline23.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.86
Control GroupTinnitus Handicap Inventory-screening Version8 weeks Post-intervention20.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.96

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026