Skip to content

Assessment of the Transferability of Skills From Robotic to Laparoscopic Simulation Platforms

Assessment of the Transferability of Skills From Robotic to Laparoscopic Simulation Platforms in Surgical Skill Naive Participants

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02370407
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-02-24
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2017-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Simulation Education

Keywords

surgical education, minimally invasive surgical procedures, laparoscopic simulation, robotic simulation, medical education

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled trial that will randomize 40 surgical skill naive medical students to practice on a robotic simulator or laparoscopic simulator after first completing a baseline evaluation on both surgical simulation platforms. Medical students will be evaluated again after 10 practice sessions on the laparoscopic or robotic platforms to assess transferability of skills between the surgical simulation platforms.

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial that will randomize medical students to practice on a robotic simulator or a laparoscopic simulator. The investigators will first obtain baseline data by having the study participants perform one task (peg transfer exercise) on a laparoscopic simulator (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS), VT Medical Inc, Waltham, MA), and a similar task on a robotic trainer (Mimic da Vinci Simulator, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Participants will then be randomized to practice on the robotic simulator or practice on the laparoscopic trainer for at least 10 repetitions. After the participants complete 10 repetitions, they will be evaluated again on both the laparoscopic and robotic simulator using time to task completion and Mimi DV trainer motion metrics. Two expert laparoscopic and robotic surgeons will also evaluate participant performance using previously validated global rating scales for robotic and laparoscopic surgery.

Interventions

DEVICEa laparoscopic simulator (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS), VT Medical Inc, Waltham, MA)

10 repetitions of practice on laparoscopic simulator.

DEVICEMimic da Vinci robotic simulator

10 repetitions of practice on Mimic da Vinci robotic simulator.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medical students with no prior laparoscopic or robotic experience in clinical or practice setting

Exclusion criteria

* Prior laparoscopic or robotic experience in clinical setting or in practice setting

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Task Completion (Robotic Task)1 day of practicePrimary outcome will be time to task completion (seconds) on the robotic task
Global Rating Scale Score on the Laparoscopic TaskStudy durationGlobal rating scale score on the laparoscopic task. A composite score of (1) depth perception, (2) bimanual dexterity, (3) efficiency, (4) tissue handling, (5) time and motion, (6) instrument handling, and (7) flow of operation, each scored 1 through 5 on an anchored Likert scale where higher scores indicated improved proficiency. Point range 7 - 35.
Global Rating Scale Score on the Robotic TaskStudy durationA composite score of (1) depth perception, (2) bimanual dexterity, (3) efficiency, (4) tissue handling, (5) time and motion, (6) instrument handling, and (7) flow of operation, each scored 1 through 5 on an anchored Likert scale where higher scores indicated improved proficiency. Point range 7 - 35.
Time to Task Completion on the Laparoscopic Task1 day of practiceTime to task completion (seconds) on the laparoscopic task

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Instrument Collisionsstudy durationAutomatically recorded data on the Mimic DV trainer which records number of collisions
Workspace Rangestudy durationAutomatically recorded data on the Mimic DV trainer consisting of workspace range (cm, this is the widest range traveled by the 2 instruments, one in each hand), and number of peg drops
Time Spent Using Excessive Forcestudy durationAutomatically recorded data on the Mimic DV trainer (seconds)
Economy of Motion on the Robotic TaskStudy duration(cm, where lower measurements represent improved economy of motion). This measures how many cm the instruments traveled in order to accomplish the task
Instrument Out of Viewthrough study completionAutomatically recorded data on the Mimic DV trainer, (sec). The longer out of view indicates decreased proficiency

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Laparoscopic Simulator
20 study participants will be randomized to perform peg transfer task on a laparoscopic simulator 10 times (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS), VT Medical Inc, Waltham, MA). a laparoscopic simulator (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS), VT Medical Inc, Waltham, MA): 10 repetitions of practice on laparoscopic simulator.
20
Mimic da Vinci Robotic Simulator
20 study participants will be randomized to perform peg board 1 exercise 10 times on a Mimic da Vinci robotic simulator (Mimic da Vinci Simulator, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Mimic da Vinci robotic simulator: 10 repetitions of practice on Mimic da Vinci robotic simulator.
20
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLaparoscopic SimulatorMimic da Vinci Robotic SimulatorTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants20 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants11 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Global Rating Scale Score on the Laparoscopic Task

Global rating scale score on the laparoscopic task. A composite score of (1) depth perception, (2) bimanual dexterity, (3) efficiency, (4) tissue handling, (5) time and motion, (6) instrument handling, and (7) flow of operation, each scored 1 through 5 on an anchored Likert scale where higher scores indicated improved proficiency. Point range 7 - 35.

Time frame: Study duration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupGlobal Rating Scale Score on the Laparoscopic Task22.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Robotic GroupGlobal Rating Scale Score on the Laparoscopic Task16.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Primary

Global Rating Scale Score on the Robotic Task

A composite score of (1) depth perception, (2) bimanual dexterity, (3) efficiency, (4) tissue handling, (5) time and motion, (6) instrument handling, and (7) flow of operation, each scored 1 through 5 on an anchored Likert scale where higher scores indicated improved proficiency. Point range 7 - 35.

Time frame: Study duration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupGlobal Rating Scale Score on the Robotic Task16.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Robotic GroupGlobal Rating Scale Score on the Robotic Task23.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Primary

Time to Task Completion on the Laparoscopic Task

Time to task completion (seconds) on the laparoscopic task

Time frame: 1 day of practice

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupTime to Task Completion on the Laparoscopic Task100 secondsStandard Deviation 29
Robotic GroupTime to Task Completion on the Laparoscopic Task158 secondsStandard Deviation 65
Primary

Time to Task Completion (Robotic Task)

Primary outcome will be time to task completion (seconds) on the robotic task

Time frame: 1 day of practice

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupTime to Task Completion (Robotic Task)120 secondsStandard Deviation 42
Robotic GroupTime to Task Completion (Robotic Task)71 secondsStandard Deviation 23
Secondary

Economy of Motion on the Robotic Task

(cm, where lower measurements represent improved economy of motion). This measures how many cm the instruments traveled in order to accomplish the task

Time frame: Study duration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupEconomy of Motion on the Robotic Task241 cmStandard Deviation 57
Robotic GroupEconomy of Motion on the Robotic Task161 cmStandard Deviation 35
Secondary

Instrument Collisions

Automatically recorded data on the Mimic DV trainer which records number of collisions

Time frame: study duration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupInstrument Collisions2.8 number of eventsStandard Deviation 4.3
Robotic GroupInstrument Collisions1.1 number of eventsStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Instrument Out of View

Automatically recorded data on the Mimic DV trainer, (sec). The longer out of view indicates decreased proficiency

Time frame: through study completion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupInstrument Out of View3.06 secondsStandard Deviation 3.3
Robotic GroupInstrument Out of View0.91 secondsStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Time Spent Using Excessive Force

Automatically recorded data on the Mimic DV trainer (seconds)

Time frame: study duration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupTime Spent Using Excessive Force0.28 secondsStandard Deviation 0.58
Robotic GroupTime Spent Using Excessive Force0.24 secondsStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Workspace Range

Automatically recorded data on the Mimic DV trainer consisting of workspace range (cm, this is the widest range traveled by the 2 instruments, one in each hand), and number of peg drops

Time frame: study duration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laparoscopic GroupWorkspace Range9.41 cmStandard Deviation 2.3
Robotic GroupWorkspace Range9.34 cmStandard Deviation 2.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026