Skip to content

Esmolol to Treat the Hemodynamic Effects of Septic Shock

Esmolol to Treat the Hemodynamic Effects of Septic Shock

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02369900
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-02-24
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2021-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypotension, Septic Shock, Tachycardia

Keywords

Esmolol, Septic Shock, Hypotension, Tachycardia

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to determine the effects of controlling the heart rate of patients with septic shock using an intravenous medication called esmolol.

Detailed description

Septic shock is a leading cause of death around the world, with a mortality that often ranges 30-50% but in some locations may be even higher. Despite advances in critical care medicine over the last several decades, few therapeutic interventions have demonstrated mortality benefit in this population besides antimicrobial medications, intravenous fluids, and controlling the source of the infection; multiple agents which at one time showed promise have ultimately failed to deliver meaningful clinical benefit. As such, there is an ongoing need to identify therapeutic interventions which can modify the course of disease for these patients. Septic shock is traditionally characterized by a hyperdynamic hemodynamic profile with a high cardiac output (CO) and low systemic vascular resistance (SVR) in association with excessive catecholamine stimulation. Tachycardia is a common finding in septic shock as an early compensatory mechanism to increase cardiac output in the setting of low SVR. Often tachycardia persists beyond the initial stages of septic shock, and has been associated with restricted diastolic ventricular filling, increased oxygen requirements, and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy, as well as myocardial depression, immunosuppression, and direct myocyte toxicity via calcium overload. Generally, clinical practice has been to avoid trying to control the tachycardic response for fear of worsening cardiac output and causing cardiovascular collapse. However, a recent single center randomized trial of the intravenous beta-1 adrenoreceptor antagonist esmolol demonstrated that control of heart rate to a more 'normal' range was safe, well-tolerated, and appeared beneficial, with a 30% reduction in mortality found in this trial. While an intriguing concept with results that appear promising, further investigation among an ICU cohort in the United States is necessary before the administration of beta-blockade therapy to a patient in septic shock should be implemented in routine clinical practice. We hypothesize that the provision of esmolol to patients in vasopressor-dependent septic shock with tachycardia will lower the heart rate, thereby improving diastolic filling time and improving cardiac output, resulting in a reduction in need for vasopressor support. To test our hypothesis, we are conducting a Phase II randomized trial to determine if esmolol decreases vasopressor requirements (primary endpoint) and alters the inflammatory cascade as well as oxygen consumption in patients with septic shock (secondary endpoints).

Interventions

OTHERSaline
DRUGEsmolol

Sponsors

American Heart Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (≥ 18 years) * Sepsis defined as suspected or confirmed infection with at least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria * Norepinephrine (minimum 0.1 mcg/kg/min) support to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg despite appropriate volume resuscitation (as defined by the clinical team, however at least 30mL/kg intravenous fluid * Heart rate ≥ 95 per minute for at least 2 hours prior to enrollment * 6-24 hours since ICU admission

Exclusion criteria

* Intravenous β-blocker therapy prior to randomization * Pronounced cardiac dysfunction (i.e. cardiac index \[CI\] ≤ 2.2 L/min/m2) * Known significant valvular heart disease * Research-protected populations (pregnant women, prisoners, intellectually disabled) * Known Do-not-resuscitate or do-not-intubate order at the time of enrollment * Infusion of epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine or milrinone at time of enrollment * Known allergy/sensitivity to esmolol or history of asthma/COPD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for Vasopressor Support, Measured as Mean Norepinephrine Equivalent Dose (mcg/kg/Min), at 6hr Time Point6 hoursThe primary endpoint will be mean norepinephrine equivalent dose (mcg/kg/min) at 6 hours after onset of study drug. For the vasopressor vasopressin, the dose of vasopressin was multiplied by 2.5 in order to create a norepinephrine equivalent dose. For the vasopressor phenylephrine, the dose of phenylephrine was divided by 10 in order to create a norepinephrine equivalent dose.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart Rates Between Groups6 and 12 hoursWe will measure median heart rate at the 6 and 12h time points.
Time to Shock ReversalDuration of hospitalization, limit 180 daysTime to shock reversal (cessation of all vasopressors for at least 12h).
Lactate6, 12, and 24 hoursMedian percent change from baseline lactate measured at the 6, 12, and 24 hour time points after study initiation between groups. Percent change was calculated by subtracting the later lactate from the baseline lactate and dividing the difference by the baseline lactate (i.e. (baseline lactate - 6h lactate)/baseline lactate).
Oxygen Consumption (VO2)12 and 24 hoursTo analyze the difference in oxygen consumption between groups at 12 hours, 24 hours and over time for patients who were on mechanical ventilation at enrollment, VO2 measurements were compared (standardized by bodyweight in kilograms) over time (recorded every minute from the time of study drug administration over a period of at least 24 hours) between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures. Using an unadjusted model, mean differences at 12 hours, 24 hours and for differences in the overall trend over time were tested.
Overall Need for Vasopressor Support12 and 24 hoursWhile the primary endpoint will be mean norepinephrine dose at 6h, we will also measure mean vasopressor dose in groups at 12h and 24h.
Interleukin-612 and 24 hoursTo characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of interleukin-6 at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.
Interleukin-1012 and 24 hoursTo characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of interleukin-10 at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.
TNF-alpha12 and 24 hoursTo characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of TNF-alpha at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.
C-reactive Protein12 and 24 hoursTo characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of C-reactive protein at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.
Interleukin-412 and 24 hoursTo characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of interleukin-4 at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Esmolol Infusion
Esmolol infusion for 24 hours. Esmolol will be titrated to a heart rate of 80 - 94 per minute, starting at 10mcg/kg/min and subsequently increasing every 20 minutes in increments of 10 mcg/kg/min (or slower at the discretion of the team) until target is achieved. The maximum allowed dose will be 300mcg/kg/min. Patients, irrespective of treatment group, will be managed at the discretion of the clinical team. BIDMC has internal guidelines for the management of septic shock which reflect the most recent 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines and are incorporated into the care of patients with septic shock in the ICUs Esmolol
18
Standard Care, Saline
Standard care (no esmolol). Patients, irrespective of treatment group, will be managed at the discretion of the clinical team. BIDMC has internal guidelines for the management of septic shock which reflect the most recent 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines and are incorporated into the care of patients with septic shock in the ICUs Saline
22
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEsmolol InfusionStandard Care, SalineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants14 Participants24 Participants
Age, Continuous64 years62 years63 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants18 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants22 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants13 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 188 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 180 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Need for Vasopressor Support, Measured as Mean Norepinephrine Equivalent Dose (mcg/kg/Min), at 6hr Time Point

The primary endpoint will be mean norepinephrine equivalent dose (mcg/kg/min) at 6 hours after onset of study drug. For the vasopressor vasopressin, the dose of vasopressin was multiplied by 2.5 in order to create a norepinephrine equivalent dose. For the vasopressor phenylephrine, the dose of phenylephrine was divided by 10 in order to create a norepinephrine equivalent dose.

Time frame: 6 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Esmolol InfusionNeed for Vasopressor Support, Measured as Mean Norepinephrine Equivalent Dose (mcg/kg/Min), at 6hr Time Point0.30 mcg/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.17
Standard Care, SalineNeed for Vasopressor Support, Measured as Mean Norepinephrine Equivalent Dose (mcg/kg/Min), at 6hr Time Point0.21 mcg/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.19
Secondary

C-reactive Protein

To characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of C-reactive protein at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.

Time frame: 12 and 24 hours

Population: Blood was not able to be drawn from all patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionC-reactive Protein12 hours140.5 pg/mL
Esmolol InfusionC-reactive Protein24 hours155.2 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineC-reactive Protein12 hours170.2 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineC-reactive Protein24 hours189.7 pg/mL
Secondary

Heart Rates Between Groups

We will measure median heart rate at the 6 and 12h time points.

Time frame: 6 and 12 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionHeart Rates Between Groups6 hours92 beats per minutes
Esmolol InfusionHeart Rates Between Groups12 hours89 beats per minutes
Standard Care, SalineHeart Rates Between Groups6 hours98 beats per minutes
Standard Care, SalineHeart Rates Between Groups12 hours96 beats per minutes
Secondary

Interleukin-10

To characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of interleukin-10 at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.

Time frame: 12 and 24 hours

Population: Blood was not able to be drawn from all patients at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionInterleukin-1012 hours3.5 pg/mL
Esmolol InfusionInterleukin-1024 hours3.4 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineInterleukin-1012 hours5.4 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineInterleukin-1024 hours2.8 pg/mL
Secondary

Interleukin-4

To characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of interleukin-4 at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.

Time frame: 12 and 24 hours

Population: Blood was not able to be drawn from all patients at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionInterleukin-412 hours0.027 pg/mL
Esmolol InfusionInterleukin-424 hours0.016 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineInterleukin-412 hours0.023 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineInterleukin-424 hours0.018 pg/mL
Secondary

Interleukin-6

To characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of interleukin-6 at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.

Time frame: 12 and 24 hours

Population: Blood was not able to be drawn from all patients at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionInterleukin-612 hours62.3 pg/mL
Esmolol InfusionInterleukin-624 hours54.4 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineInterleukin-612 hours78.3 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineInterleukin-624 hours39.0 pg/mL
Secondary

Lactate

Median percent change from baseline lactate measured at the 6, 12, and 24 hour time points after study initiation between groups. Percent change was calculated by subtracting the later lactate from the baseline lactate and dividing the difference by the baseline lactate (i.e. (baseline lactate - 6h lactate)/baseline lactate).

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 hours

Population: One patient in the standard care group was missing lactate levels at 6, 12, and 24 hours and one patient in the standard care group was missing a lactate level at 24 hours.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionLactate12 hours27.5 percent change from baseline
Esmolol InfusionLactate6 hours16.7 percent change from baseline
Esmolol InfusionLactate24 hours30.4 percent change from baseline
Standard Care, SalineLactate12 hours8.8 percent change from baseline
Standard Care, SalineLactate6 hours0 percent change from baseline
Standard Care, SalineLactate24 hours19.1 percent change from baseline
Secondary

Overall Need for Vasopressor Support

While the primary endpoint will be mean norepinephrine dose at 6h, we will also measure mean vasopressor dose in groups at 12h and 24h.

Time frame: 12 and 24 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Esmolol InfusionOverall Need for Vasopressor Support12 hours0.31 mcg/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.19
Esmolol InfusionOverall Need for Vasopressor Support24 hours0.24 mcg/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.19
Standard Care, SalineOverall Need for Vasopressor Support12 hours0.17 mcg/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.17
Standard Care, SalineOverall Need for Vasopressor Support24 hours0.16 mcg/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.17
Secondary

Oxygen Consumption (VO2)

To analyze the difference in oxygen consumption between groups at 12 hours, 24 hours and over time for patients who were on mechanical ventilation at enrollment, VO2 measurements were compared (standardized by bodyweight in kilograms) over time (recorded every minute from the time of study drug administration over a period of at least 24 hours) between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures. Using an unadjusted model, mean differences at 12 hours, 24 hours and for differences in the overall trend over time were tested.

Time frame: 12 and 24 hours

Population: Only patients on mechanical ventilation who were able to be attached to the VO2 machine and had data within the first 24 hours were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionOxygen Consumption (VO2)12 hours3.78 mL/kg/min
Esmolol InfusionOxygen Consumption (VO2)24 hours4.13 mL/kg/min
Standard Care, SalineOxygen Consumption (VO2)12 hours4.29 mL/kg/min
Standard Care, SalineOxygen Consumption (VO2)24 hours4.83 mL/kg/min
Secondary

Time to Shock Reversal

Time to shock reversal (cessation of all vasopressors for at least 12h).

Time frame: Duration of hospitalization, limit 180 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionTime to Shock Reversal3.9 days
Standard Care, SalineTime to Shock Reversal2.5 days
Secondary

TNF-alpha

To characterize effects of esmolol on inflammatory markers in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, we compared log-transformed values of TNF-alpha at 12 and 24 hours and over time between groups using mixed linear model accounting for repeated measures and adjusting for pre-intervention levels.

Time frame: 12 and 24 hours

Population: Blood was not able to be drawn from all patients at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Esmolol InfusionTNF-alpha12 hours4.5 pg/mL
Esmolol InfusionTNF-alpha24 hours4.4 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineTNF-alpha12 hours8.7 pg/mL
Standard Care, SalineTNF-alpha24 hours7.5 pg/mL

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026