Skip to content

Improving Teamwork in an Academic, Tertiary Care Labor and Delivery Unit

A Decade of Safon Rounds: Interdisciplinary Daily Rounding as a Method of Improving Teamwork in an Academic, Tertiary Care Labor and Delivery Unit

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02368535
Acronym
SAFON
Enrollment
234
Registered
2015-02-23
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2015-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interdisciplinary Communication

Keywords

teamwork

Brief summary

The investigators wanted to determine if the establishment of interdisciplinary rounds has made meaningful changes in the perceptions of teamwork and communication. The purpose of this study is to determine if the establishment of interdisciplinary daily rounding has improved teamwork in an academic, tertiary care labor and delivery unit.

Detailed description

Failures in teamwork and communication are among the leading cases of sentinel and adverse obstetric events. Multidisciplinary approaches and communication could improve patients outcomes. In 2003, leaders from the department of obstetrics, anesthesia and nursing decided to institute interdisciplinary rounds as a method of improving team communication. Obstetricians, Anesthesiologists, Nurses, Perinatologists, Administrative Assistants, Consultants, and Neonatologists participate in the rounds. The investigators wanted to determine if the establishment of interdisciplinary rounds has made meaningful changes in the perceptions of teamwork and communication. The purpose of this study is to determine if the establishment of interdisciplinary daily rounding has improved teamwork in an academic, tertiary care labor and delivery unit.

Interventions

OTHERSurvey

25-item questionnaire on pereception of interdisciplinary rounds

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Working at L&D at Brigham and Women's and participating in daily rounds

Exclusion criteria

* subject's refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Perception of Teamwork Elements Present in Interdisciplinary Rounds - Total Response ScoresIndividual Participation-10 min; Study Completion within 1 Year

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026