Skip to content

Efficacy of Ear Neurostimulation for Adolescents With Functional Abdominal Pain

Efficacy of Auricular Neurostimulation for Adolescents With Pain-Associated Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02367729
Enrollment
115
Registered
2015-02-20
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2018-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Disorder of Intestine, Nausea Persistent

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a neurostimulator applied to the outer ear for adolescents with functional gastrointestinal disorders. The neurostimulator provides nerve stimulation to a branch of the vagus nerve which is thought to be involved in transmission of pain signals. Half of the study subjects will receive an active nerve stimulator while the other half will receive an inactive one.

Detailed description

The vagus nerve innervates the gastrointestinal tract and influences the autonomic nervous system. It is thought to carry signals of discomfort and nausea to the brain where it is interpreted. The autonomic nervous system may be in imbalance in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. By stimulating a branch of the vagus nerve in the outer ear, this study aims to improve symptoms and quality of life in adolescents with functional abdominal pain with or without nausea. Subjects will be randomized into two groups: 1) neurostimulation versus 2) sham. They will receive either an active or non-active (sham group) device for 5 days each week x 4 weeks total. Pain, nausea, anxiety, quality of life, potential side effects and overall symptom improvement will be monitored weekly for the entire study as well as after the study is completed.

Interventions

Non-invasive, battery operated neurostimulator of the external ear worn for 5 days each week x 4 weeks.

DEVICESham

Inactive neurostimulator device pre-programmed to be inactive. To be worn for 5 days each week x 4 weeks.

Sponsors

American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adolescents with a major complaint of abdominal pain (minimum 3/10 in severity) with or without nausea (minimum 3/10 in severity) of unclear etiology, who are English-speaking and willing to participate and consent to the study and who have a parent willing to participate. * Patients with symptoms of minimum three times per week for a duration of two months or greater * Intact external ear that is free of infection or severe dermatological conditions. * Stable vital signs for their respective age

Exclusion criteria

* Medically complex children or those who take a medication or suffer from an organic disease that can explain symptoms will be excluded from participation. * Children or parents, who have developmental delay, will be excluded due to difficulties in accurately completing the questionnaires and assessing symptoms. * History of seizures * Currently implanted electrical device * Orthostatic hypotension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Frequency-Severity-Duration Scale (PFSD) ScoreChange from Baseline to Week 4One-page, 6-item pain measure assessing pain symptoms over the past week. Measures the typical and worst pain intensity, frequency and duration over the past week in units on a scale from 0 to 10 (10 being the worst pain imaginable). Worst pain = primary outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nausea ProfileChange from Baseline to week 4 in Nausea Profile score.Two page, 17-item questionnaire which measures the subjective experience of nausea on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 9 (severely) across three dimensions: 1) somatic distress; 2) gastrointestinal distress and 3) emotional distress. Total score 153.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)Change from Baseline (Pre) to 2-3 months after end of therapy (Post)State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C). State anxiety measured by 20-item questionnaire assessing anxiety at a particular moment in time on a 3-point rating scale. Raw scores (range 20-60) were converted to normalized T-Scores based on a population of healthy school children (mean=50; standard deviation=10) with higher score indicating worse outcome. Effects of intervention on state anxiety was assessed before (pre) and after (post) therapy.
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Global Health (PGH-7)Change from Baseline (Pre) to 2-3 months after end of therapy (Post)A 7-item instrument that measures quality of life in relation to health. Each question has five response options (scored 1-5 units on a scale). A total raw sum score is generated, ranging from lowest score of 7 and highest score of 35 with higher scores indicating better outcome (improved quality of life). The raw score is converted to a standardized T-score (mean=50; standard deviation=10) based on a population of healthy children. T-scores were compared before (Pre) and after (Post) treatment intervention.
Functional Disability Inventory (FDI)Change from Baseline (Pre) to 2-3 months after end of therapy (Post)15-item instrument, each question rated on a five-point scale (0=no trouble to 4=impossible), indicating how much difficulty subjects have doing common childhood activities because of their physical health. A total score is summed (range 0-60) with higher score indicating worse outcome (greater pain-related disability). Scored were compared before (Pre) and after (Post) treatment intervention.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesBaseline only (diagnostic criteria)Nine-page, validated, parent-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms associated with pediatric functional GI disorders to diagnose the following specific Rome III criteria: Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Functional Dyspepsia, Abdominal Migraine, Functional Abdominal Pain and Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome. The number of participants with these specific diagnoses at baseline were reported, including overlapping diagnoses.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eligible subjects ages 11-18 years, recruited from the outpatient Gastroenterology clinic at the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin between September 2015 and November 2016.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were excluded if there were any changes to their current medications or any new medications added during the two weeks prior to study start. Any subject with a new diagnosis of an organic medical condition was also excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Neurostimulator
Auricular neurostimulator treatment x 5 days each week for 4 consecutive weeks Neurostimulator: Non-invasive, battery operated neurostimulator of the external ear worn for 5 days each week x 4 weeks.
57
Sham Neurostimulator
Inactive auricular neurostimulator treatment x 5 days each week for 4 consecutive weeks Sham: Inactive neurostimulator device pre-programmed to be inactive. To be worn for 5 days each week x 4 weeks.
47
Total104

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyOrganic disorder diagnosed21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject05

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNeurostimulatorSham NeurostimulatorTotal
Age, Continuous15.3 years15.6 years15.3 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
African American
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
White
49 Participants44 Participants93 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 Participants47 Participants104 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants43 Participants94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 570 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 576 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 570 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Frequency-Severity-Duration Scale (PFSD) Score

One-page, 6-item pain measure assessing pain symptoms over the past week. Measures the typical and worst pain intensity, frequency and duration over the past week in units on a scale from 0 to 10 (10 being the worst pain imaginable). Worst pain = primary outcome.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 4

Population: Modified intent to treat population (all subjects who received minimum one week of therapy and with at least two available data points). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NeurostimulatorPain Frequency-Severity-Duration Scale (PFSD) Score5.0 units on a scale
Sham NeurostimulatorPain Frequency-Severity-Duration Scale (PFSD) Score7.0 units on a scale
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.37, 2.93]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Functional Disability Inventory (FDI)

15-item instrument, each question rated on a five-point scale (0=no trouble to 4=impossible), indicating how much difficulty subjects have doing common childhood activities because of their physical health. A total score is summed (range 0-60) with higher score indicating worse outcome (greater pain-related disability). Scored were compared before (Pre) and after (Post) treatment intervention.

Time frame: Change from Baseline (Pre) to 2-3 months after end of therapy (Post)

Population: Modified intent to treat population (all subjects who received minimum one week of therapy and with at least two available data points). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NeurostimulatorFunctional Disability Inventory (FDI)FDI Pre17.0 units on a scale
NeurostimulatorFunctional Disability Inventory (FDI)FDI Post11 units on a scale
Sham NeurostimulatorFunctional Disability Inventory (FDI)FDI Pre17.0 units on a scale
Sham NeurostimulatorFunctional Disability Inventory (FDI)FDI Post17.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Nausea Profile

Two page, 17-item questionnaire which measures the subjective experience of nausea on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 9 (severely) across three dimensions: 1) somatic distress; 2) gastrointestinal distress and 3) emotional distress. Total score 153.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to week 4 in Nausea Profile score.

Population: Modified intent to treat population (all subjects who received minimum one week of therapy and with at least two available data points). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NeurostimulatorNausea Profile25.5 units on a scale
Sham NeurostimulatorNausea Profile20.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Global Health (PGH-7)

A 7-item instrument that measures quality of life in relation to health. Each question has five response options (scored 1-5 units on a scale). A total raw sum score is generated, ranging from lowest score of 7 and highest score of 35 with higher scores indicating better outcome (improved quality of life). The raw score is converted to a standardized T-score (mean=50; standard deviation=10) based on a population of healthy children. T-scores were compared before (Pre) and after (Post) treatment intervention.

Time frame: Change from Baseline (Pre) to 2-3 months after end of therapy (Post)

Population: Modified intent to treat population (all subjects who received minimum one week of therapy and with at least two available data points). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NeurostimulatorPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Global Health (PGH-7)PROMIS Pre42.1 T-score
NeurostimulatorPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Global Health (PGH-7)PROMIS Post42.1 T-score
Sham NeurostimulatorPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Global Health (PGH-7)PROMIS Pre37.2 T-score
Sham NeurostimulatorPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Global Health (PGH-7)PROMIS Post38.8 T-score
Secondary

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C). State anxiety measured by 20-item questionnaire assessing anxiety at a particular moment in time on a 3-point rating scale. Raw scores (range 20-60) were converted to normalized T-Scores based on a population of healthy school children (mean=50; standard deviation=10) with higher score indicating worse outcome. Effects of intervention on state anxiety was assessed before (pre) and after (post) therapy.

Time frame: Change from Baseline (Pre) to 2-3 months after end of therapy (Post)

Population: Modified intent to treat population (all subjects who received minimum one week of therapy and with at least two available data points). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NeurostimulatorState-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)State Anxiety Pre54.0 T-score
NeurostimulatorState-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)State Anxiety Post52.0 T-score
Sham NeurostimulatorState-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)State Anxiety Pre54.0 T-score
Sham NeurostimulatorState-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)State Anxiety Post54.0 T-score
Other Pre-specified

Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific Diagnoses

Nine-page, validated, parent-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms associated with pediatric functional GI disorders to diagnose the following specific Rome III criteria: Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Functional Dyspepsia, Abdominal Migraine, Functional Abdominal Pain and Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome. The number of participants with these specific diagnoses at baseline were reported, including overlapping diagnoses.

Time frame: Baseline only (diagnostic criteria)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NeurostimulatorQuestionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesIrritable Bowel Syndrome28 Participants
NeurostimulatorQuestionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesFunctional Dyspepsia12 Participants
NeurostimulatorQuestionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesAbdominal Migraine16 Participants
NeurostimulatorQuestionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesFunctional Abdominal Pain1 Participants
Sham NeurostimulatorQuestionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesFunctional Abdominal Pain0 Participants
Sham NeurostimulatorQuestionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesIrritable Bowel Syndrome23 Participants
Sham NeurostimulatorQuestionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesAbdominal Migraine13 Participants
Sham NeurostimulatorQuestionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Rome III (QPGS-RIII), Reporting the Number of Participants With Specific DiagnosesFunctional Dyspepsia11 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026