Skip to content

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Depression & Other Neuropsychiatric Symptoms After Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Depression & Other Neuropsychiatric Symptoms After Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02367521
Acronym
rTMS TBI
Enrollment
70
Registered
2015-02-20
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2017-10-01
Last updated
2018-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

TBI Depression

Keywords

TBI Depression, co-morbid psychiatric symptoms

Brief summary

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently complicated by depression and other problems such as post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), sleep disturbance, cognitive deficits and behavioral problems. Untreated depression can lead to reduced productivity and poor global outcome. There is no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for the treatment of TBI-related depression. The overarching goal of this small study is to determine the effectiveness of low frequency right (LFR) rTMS for the treatment of post-TBI depression and co-occurring psychiatric symptoms. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a brain stimulation technique. It involves generating a brief magnetic field in a coil that is placed on the scalp. The magnetic field passes through the skull and induces a weak electrical current in the brain that briefly activates neural circuits at the stimulation site. Adults aged 18 and older, with a history of head injury of mild or moderate severity , who are currently experiencing symptoms of clinical depression may join the study.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTLow Frequency Right sided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LFR rTMS)

LFR rTMS will be delivered at the Brain Stimulation Program at The Johns Hopkins Hospital with a Magstim Super Rapid 2 stimulator with a focal double 70-mm air cooled coil. LFR rTMS will be administered to the Experimental Group. Control patients will receive treatment using an identically appearing coil that produces the same sound and is the same weight as the active coil, but has negligible magnetic field strength.

DEVICESham Comparator: Sham Treatment

Control patients will receive treatment using an identically appearing coil that produces the same sound and is the same weight as the active coil, but has negligible magnetic field strength

Sponsors

United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults aged 18 and over 2. H/o closed head injury 3. Must meet Department of Defense (DoD) criteria for mild or moderate Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) 4. Must meet criteria for major depression as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) and a score greater than 10 on the Hamilton Depression 17 (HAM-D17) Scale

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects with skull fracture 2. Subjects who meet DoD criteria for severe TBI 3. Subjects who are on psychotropics or mood stabilizing medications (e.g. antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, sedative/hypnotics. 4. Subjects who are medically unstable 5. History of active substance abuse x 1 month 6. Current psychotic illness 7. Evidence of frontal lesions on brain scan. 8. Individuals with a significant neurological disorders that could increase risk of seizures such as brain tumor, cerebral aneurysm, any h/o seizures and/or family h/o seizures 9. Dementia 10. Mini Mental State Exam score of less than or equal to 24 11. A positive and unmitigated response to any question on the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Safety Screen questionnaire 12. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatment within 6 months prior to the screening visit 13. History of treatment with rTMS therapy for any disorder 14. History of treatment with Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) 15. History of treatment with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) 16. Cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, intracardiac lines, 17. Intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed. 18. Implanted neurostimulators 19. Known or suspected pregnancy 20. Investigators, personnel affiliated with this study, and their immediate families.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 ScaleMean at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeksThe HAM-D was used to determine the effectiveness of LFR rTMS for the treatment of post-TBI depression. The scale ranges from 0-54, with 0-7 = Normal; 8-13= Mild Depression; 14-18= Moderate Depression, 19-22= Severe Depression, \>/= 23 = Very Severe Depression.
Mean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe CGI scale is broken down into the CGI-S and CGI-I components. CGI-S is the baseline severity of mental illness. 1= normal, not at all ill; 2= borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. The CGI-S is only performed at baseline. The CGI-I component (which is any measure after intervention) is as follows: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment.
Mean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe BSSI scale is used to assess the degree of suicidal ideation. The scale ranges from 0-38, with 0= no suicidality, and 38 = highest severity of suicidal ideation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Correct Trials on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksThe participant points to choice on the screen and the tester manipulates the mouse to make the response. The participant tells the tester if he or she wants to change the response and the tester clicks on the screen. The score is the number of correct trials, ranging from 0-128. A higher score reflects a better outcome.
Evaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test B ScoreMean at baseline and 16 weeksThe Trailmaking B score is the number of seconds spent connecting numbered circles (1-13) to circles containing letters of the alphabet (A-L) in alternating sequential order. A maximum of 300 seconds is allowed. Score ranges from 0-300. Higher score reflects poorer outcome.
Immediate Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksThe Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) consists of a 12-item word list, composed of four words from each of the three semantic categories. The subject is instructed to listen carefully as the examiner reads the word list and attempt to memorize the words. The word list is then read to the subject at the approximate rate of one word every 2 seconds. This is done for three trials. The number of correctly-recalled words in each trial is recorded (maximum of 12). The score is a sum of all the correctly-recalled words from each trial, for a maximum score of 36.
Delayed Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksThe HVLT consists of a 12-item word list, composed of four words from each of the three semantic categories. The subject is instructed to listen carefully as the examiner reads the word list and attempt to memorize the words. The word list is then read to the subject at the approximate rate of one word every 2 seconds. This is done for three trials. After the third learning trial, the patient is read 24 words and is asked to say yes after each word that appeared on the recall list (12 targets) and no after each word that did not (12 distractors). Half of the distractors are drawn from the same semantic categories as the targets (related distractors) and half are drawn from other categories (unrelated distractors). The number of correctly-recalled words in each trial is recorded (maximum of 12 per trial). The score is the sum of all the correctly-recalled words from each trial, for a maximum of 36. T-scores are reported (average T-score of 50 (ranges 40-60)
Delayed Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksBVMT is used to evaluate visuospatial memory abilities in neuropsychological populations. A visual display of six simple figures arranged in a 2 × 3 matrix on an 8 × 11 booklet is shown to participants for three consecutive 10-second trials. After each trial, participants are to draw as many designs as accurately as they can and in the correct location after a 25-minute delay filled with other distractor tasks. Scoring of the delayed recall is based on the accuracy of the drawings and the location of the figures. For each figure, one point is awarded to each satisfactory domain resulting in a maximum of 12-points per trial for a total score range of 0-36, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Immediate Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksBVMT is used to evaluate visuospatial memory abilities in neuropsychological populations. A visual display of six simple figures arranged in a 2 × 3 matrix on an 8 × 11 booklet is shown to participants for three consecutive 10-second trials. After each trial, participants are to draw as many designs as accurately as they can and in the correct location. Scoring of the immediate recall is based on the accuracy of the drawings and the location of the figures. For each figure, one point is awarded to each satisfactory domain resulting in a maximum of 12-points per trial, for a total score ranging from 0-36, with a higher score reflecting a better outcome.
Evaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test A ScoreMean at baseline and 16 weeksTrailmaking A is a psychological test with a score that is the number of seconds spent in connecting 25 numbered circles in sequential order. Score ranges from 0-150. Higher score reflects poorer outcome.
Mean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 QuestionnaireBaseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe GAD-7 questionnaire is used as a screening tool and severity measure for generalized anxiety disorder. The scale ranges from 0 - 21. 0-4 = normal 5-9 = mild 10-14 = moderate \>15 = severe
Mean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe DTS is a 17-item self-reported measure that assesses the 17 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Items are rated on 5-point frequency (0 = not at all to 4 = every day) and severity scales (0 = not at all distressing to 4 = extremely distressing). The DTS yields a frequency score (ranging from 0 to 68), severity score (ranging from 0 to 68), and total score (ranging from 0 to 136). The severity score will be used to assess this outcome.
Ability to Inhibit Cognitive Interference as Assessed by the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksThe SCWT is used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute. Participants are required to read three different tables as fast as possible. Two of the tables represent the congruous condition in which participants are required to read names of colors printed in black ink and name different color patches. In the third table, incongruous condition the color-words are printed in a different color in (ie: the word red is printed in green ink). Within this third table, participants are required to name the color of the ink instead of reading the word. The score is based on the number of items completed, which ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score reflecting a better outcome.
Mean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe ESS is used to determine the level of daytime sleepiness. It is a questionnaire composed of 8 questions. The participant answers each question on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=no sleepiness, 1= mild sleepiness, 2= moderate sleepiness, 3= severe sleepiness). The total score is the sum of all responses for a maximum score of 24. A higher score reflects increased sleepiness.
Mean Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksMOCA is designed to assess cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. It is composed of the following: Visuospatial and Executive Functioning: 5 points Animal Naming: 3 points Attention: 6 points Language: 3 points Abstraction: 2 points Delayed Recall (Short-term Memory): 5 points Orientation: 6 points Education Level: 1 point is added to the test-taker's score if he or she has 12 years or less of formal education. Score ranges 0-31, with ≥ 26 being normal cognitive function. The lower the score, the greater the level of cognitive impairment.
Presence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe NBRS is a 28-item interview which includes a test of orientation and memory for recent events, questions regarding emotional state, post-concussional symptoms, focused attention, and concentration (performing serial sevens), explanation of proverbs, tasks of planning and mental flexibility, and delayed recall of three objects presented at the beginning of a session. Observations are also made regarding the patient's fatigability, visible signs of anxiety, disinhibition, agitation, hostility, difficulties in expressive and receptive communication, and disturbance of mood. The balance of the items are rated according to the patient's performance on brief tasks and quality of answers to interview questions. Each of the 28 items are scored on a scale of 0 (not severe) to 6 (extremely severe), for a maximum score of 168. A higher score reflects increased severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Presence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksParticipants are asked to rate the severity of 16 different symptoms over the past 24 hours, on a severity scale from 0 to 4 (0 = not experienced, 1 = no more of a problem, 2 = mild problem, 3 = moderate problem, 4 = severe problem). The 16 symptoms include: headaches, dizziness, nausea and/or vomiting, hyperacusis, sleep disturbance, fatigue, being irritable, feeling depressed, feeling frustrated, forgetfulness, poor concentration, taking longer to think, blurred vision, light sensitivity, double vision, restlessness. Score ranges from 0 to 64, with a higher score reflecting increased severity of post-concussive symptoms.
Fatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe FSS is a 9-item questionnaire which measures the severity of fatigue and how it interferes with certain activities. The items are scored on a 7-point scale with 1=strongly disagree and 7=strongly agree. The score ranges from 9 to a maximum of 63. A higher score reflects greater fatigue severity.
Aggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksMOAS measures four types of aggressive behavior as witnessed in the past week. Each section consists of five items, with the first section regarding verbal aggression, the second section focusing on aggression against property, the third section measuring autoaggression, and the fourth section concerning physical aggression. Participants are asked to check each item that is true over the last week. Items are allocated 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 point(s), and then all points for each selected item are summed. The maximum total for each section is 10 if all items are selected. Total score ranges from 0-40 with a higher score indicating more aggressive behavior.
Overall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) QuestionnaireMean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe SWL is a 7-point Likert-style response scale. The possible range of scores is 5-35, with a score of 20 representing a neutral point on the scale. Scores between 5-9 indicate the respondent is extremely dissatisfied with life, whereas scores between 31-35 indicate the respondent is extremely satisfied.
Presence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe STC reflects the level of social contact. The score ranges from 0-10, with 0= excellent contact, 10=no contact. A higher score reflects poorer social contact.
Mean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe PSQI score scale ranges from 0-21. 0 = very good sleep quality 21 = very bad sleep quality A total score of 5 or greater is indicative of poor sleep quality (reflecting a higher level of fatigue)
Cognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Completed Categories on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksThe participant points to choice on the screen and the tester manipulates the mouse to make the response. The participant tells the tester if he or she wants to change the response and the tester clicks on the screen. The score is the number of completed categories, ranging from 0-6. A higher score reflects a better outcome.
Cognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Errors Made on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)Mean at baseline and 16 weeksThe participant points to choice on the screen and the tester manipulates the mouse to make the response. The participant tells the tester if he or she wants to change the response and the tester clicks on the screen. The score is the number of errors, ranging from 0-128. A higher score reflects a poorer outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

70 participants passed screening & were enrolled in study. 36 were not randomized.14 lost to follow-up, 5 refused due to scheduling, 5 did not meet DSM IV criteria: major depression, 3 concerns about receiving rTMS, 2 psychotropics, 2 did not have TBI, 1 using illicit drugs, 1 skull fracture, 1 severe TBI, 1 with seizure history, 1 MRI focal lesion

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sham Treatment
Control patients will receive treatment using an identically appearing coil that produces the same sound and is the same weight as the active coil, but has negligible magnetic field strength Sham Comparator: Sham Treatment: Control patients will receive treatment using an identically appearing coil that produces the same sound and is the same weight as the active coil, but has negligible magnetic field strength
17
LFR rTMS
Investigators propose to deliver 1200 pulses daily at 110% Motor threshold for 4 weeks using four trains of 300 pulses daily separated by an intertrain interval of 60 seconds. Low Frequency Right sided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LFR rTMS): LFR rTMS will be delivered at the Brain Stimulation Program at The Johns Hopkins Hospital with a Magstim Super Rapid 2 stimulator with a focal double 70-mm air cooled coil. LFR rTMS will be administered to the Experimental Group. Control patients will receive treatment using an identically appearing coil that produces the same sound and is the same weight as the active coil, but has negligible magnetic field strength.
13
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studysevere headache after intervention20
Overall Studyunable to find transportation20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham TreatmentLFR rTMSTotal
Age, Continuous40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
Months Depressed Since Injury39.4 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43
39.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.1
39.47 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.51
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-White
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 Participants13 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants5 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 177 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Average Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale

The HAM-D was used to determine the effectiveness of LFR rTMS for the treatment of post-TBI depression. The scale ranges from 0-54, with 0-7 = Normal; 8-13= Mild Depression; 14-18= Moderate Depression, 19-22= Severe Depression, \>/= 23 = Very Severe Depression.

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale4 weeks13.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.444
LFR rTMSAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale12 weeks14.077 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.21
LFR rTMSAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale8 weeks12.538 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.744
LFR rTMSAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale16 weeks11.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.529
LFR rTMSAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 ScaleBaseline23.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.375
Sham TreatmentAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale16 weeks12.941 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.877
Sham TreatmentAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 ScaleBaseline23.076 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.356
Sham TreatmentAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale4 weeks12.706 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.697
Sham TreatmentAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale8 weeks12.647 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.901
Sham TreatmentAverage Depression Score Using the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) 17 Scale12 weeks12.824 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.435
Primary

Mean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)

The CGI scale is broken down into the CGI-S and CGI-I components. CGI-S is the baseline severity of mental illness. 1= normal, not at all ill; 2= borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. The CGI-S is only performed at baseline. The CGI-I component (which is any measure after intervention) is as follows: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment.

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI 4 weeks (improvement)2.308 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.109
LFR rTMSMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI 12 weeks (improvement)2.385 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0444
LFR rTMSMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI 8 weeks (improvement)2.385 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.044
LFR rTMSMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI 16 weeks (improvement)2.077 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.854
LFR rTMSMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI Baseline (severity)4.846 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.801
Sham TreatmentMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI 16 weeks (improvement)2.471 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.281
Sham TreatmentMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI Baseline (severity)5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.791
Sham TreatmentMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI 4 weeks (improvement)2.824 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.334
Sham TreatmentMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI 8 weeks (improvement)2.471 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.125
Sham TreatmentMean Clinical Global Improvement- Severity/Improvement Scale Score (CGI-I/CGI-S)CGI 12 weeks (improvement)2.588 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.064
Primary

Mean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)

The BSSI scale is used to assess the degree of suicidal ideation. The scale ranges from 0-38, with 0= no suicidality, and 38 = highest severity of suicidal ideation

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)Baseline0.462 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.127
LFR rTMSMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)12 weeks0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
LFR rTMSMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)4 weeks0.077 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.277
LFR rTMSMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)16 weeks0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
LFR rTMSMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)8 weeks0.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.376
Sham TreatmentMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)16 weeks0.471 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.943
Sham TreatmentMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)4 weeks0.706 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.359
Sham TreatmentMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)8 weeks0.353 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.862
Sham TreatmentMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)12 weeks0.529 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.007
Sham TreatmentMean Suicidal Ideation as Assessed by the Beck Suicidal Ideation Scale (BSSI)Baseline1.294 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.896
Secondary

Ability to Inhibit Cognitive Interference as Assessed by the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT)

The SCWT is used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute. Participants are required to read three different tables as fast as possible. Two of the tables represent the congruous condition in which participants are required to read names of colors printed in black ink and name different color patches. In the third table, incongruous condition the color-words are printed in a different color in (ie: the word red is printed in green ink). Within this third table, participants are required to name the color of the ink instead of reading the word. The score is based on the number of items completed, which ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score reflecting a better outcome.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSAbility to Inhibit Cognitive Interference as Assessed by the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT)0 weeks43.2 items completedStandard Deviation 13.3
LFR rTMSAbility to Inhibit Cognitive Interference as Assessed by the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT)16 weeks45.4 items completedStandard Deviation 11.9
Sham TreatmentAbility to Inhibit Cognitive Interference as Assessed by the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT)0 weeks42.4 items completedStandard Deviation 8.2
Sham TreatmentAbility to Inhibit Cognitive Interference as Assessed by the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT)16 weeks43.1 items completedStandard Deviation 11.6
Secondary

Aggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)

MOAS measures four types of aggressive behavior as witnessed in the past week. Each section consists of five items, with the first section regarding verbal aggression, the second section focusing on aggression against property, the third section measuring autoaggression, and the fourth section concerning physical aggression. Participants are asked to check each item that is true over the last week. Items are allocated 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 point(s), and then all points for each selected item are summed. The maximum total for each section is 10 if all items are selected. Total score ranges from 0-40 with a higher score indicating more aggressive behavior.

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)4 weeks1.308 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.377
LFR rTMSAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)12 weeks1.417 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.429
LFR rTMSAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)8 weeks0.692 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.855
LFR rTMSAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)16 weeks1.308 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.213
LFR rTMSAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)Baseline2.308 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.136
Sham TreatmentAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)16 weeks0.706 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.312
Sham TreatmentAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)Baseline3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.016
Sham TreatmentAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)4 weeks1.118 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.759
Sham TreatmentAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)8 weeks0.471 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.068
Sham TreatmentAggressive Behavior as Assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)12 weeks1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.932
Secondary

Cognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Completed Categories on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)

The participant points to choice on the screen and the tester manipulates the mouse to make the response. The participant tells the tester if he or she wants to change the response and the tester clicks on the screen. The score is the number of completed categories, ranging from 0-6. A higher score reflects a better outcome.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Completed Categories on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)0 weeks5.5 completed categoriesStandard Deviation 0.707
LFR rTMSCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Completed Categories on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)16 weeks6 completed categoriesStandard Deviation 0
Sham TreatmentCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Completed Categories on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)0 weeks6 completed categoriesStandard Deviation 0
Sham TreatmentCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Completed Categories on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)16 weeks6 completed categoriesStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Cognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Correct Trials on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)

The participant points to choice on the screen and the tester manipulates the mouse to make the response. The participant tells the tester if he or she wants to change the response and the tester clicks on the screen. The score is the number of correct trials, ranging from 0-128. A higher score reflects a better outcome.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Correct Trials on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)Baseline74.5 correct trialsStandard Deviation 14.849
LFR rTMSCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Correct Trials on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)16 weeks67 correct trialsStandard Deviation 4.05
Sham TreatmentCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Correct Trials on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)Baseline68.857 correct trialsStandard Deviation 9.703
Sham TreatmentCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Correct Trials on the Wisconsin Card Scoring Test (WCST)16 weeks69.667 correct trialsStandard Deviation 8.981
Secondary

Cognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Errors Made on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)

The participant points to choice on the screen and the tester manipulates the mouse to make the response. The participant tells the tester if he or she wants to change the response and the tester clicks on the screen. The score is the number of errors, ranging from 0-128. A higher score reflects a poorer outcome.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Errors Made on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)Baseline26 errorsStandard Deviation 24.042
LFR rTMSCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Errors Made on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)16 weeks10.5 errorsStandard Deviation 2.881
Sham TreatmentCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Errors Made on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)Baseline11 errorsStandard Deviation 5.354
Sham TreatmentCognitive Reasoning as Assessed by the Number of Errors Made on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)16 weeks8.667 errorsStandard Deviation 1.633
Secondary

Delayed Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)

BVMT is used to evaluate visuospatial memory abilities in neuropsychological populations. A visual display of six simple figures arranged in a 2 × 3 matrix on an 8 × 11 booklet is shown to participants for three consecutive 10-second trials. After each trial, participants are to draw as many designs as accurately as they can and in the correct location after a 25-minute delay filled with other distractor tasks. Scoring of the delayed recall is based on the accuracy of the drawings and the location of the figures. For each figure, one point is awarded to each satisfactory domain resulting in a maximum of 12-points per trial for a total score range of 0-36, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSDelayed Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)Baseline9.23 accurately-drawn figuresStandard Deviation 2.713
LFR rTMSDelayed Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)16 weeks8.308 accurately-drawn figuresStandard Deviation 3.066
Sham TreatmentDelayed Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)Baseline9.688 accurately-drawn figuresStandard Deviation 3.005
Sham TreatmentDelayed Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)16 weeks8.813 accurately-drawn figuresStandard Deviation 2.509
Secondary

Delayed Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)

The HVLT consists of a 12-item word list, composed of four words from each of the three semantic categories. The subject is instructed to listen carefully as the examiner reads the word list and attempt to memorize the words. The word list is then read to the subject at the approximate rate of one word every 2 seconds. This is done for three trials. After the third learning trial, the patient is read 24 words and is asked to say yes after each word that appeared on the recall list (12 targets) and no after each word that did not (12 distractors). Half of the distractors are drawn from the same semantic categories as the targets (related distractors) and half are drawn from other categories (unrelated distractors). The number of correctly-recalled words in each trial is recorded (maximum of 12 per trial). The score is the sum of all the correctly-recalled words from each trial, for a maximum of 36. T-scores are reported (average T-score of 50 (ranges 40-60)

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSDelayed Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline44.364 T-score of correctly-recalled wordsStandard Deviation 10.604
LFR rTMSDelayed Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)16 weeks49.111 T-score of correctly-recalled wordsStandard Deviation 12.956
Sham TreatmentDelayed Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline43.071 T-score of correctly-recalled wordsStandard Deviation 9.635
Sham TreatmentDelayed Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)16 weeks47.692 T-score of correctly-recalled wordsStandard Deviation 5.836
Secondary

Evaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test A Score

Trailmaking A is a psychological test with a score that is the number of seconds spent in connecting 25 numbered circles in sequential order. Score ranges from 0-150. Higher score reflects poorer outcome.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSEvaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test A Score16 weeks23.133 secondsStandard Deviation 5.8
LFR rTMSEvaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test A ScoreBaseline27.725 secondsStandard Deviation 8.285
Sham TreatmentEvaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test A ScoreBaseline31.434 secondsStandard Deviation 10.02
Sham TreatmentEvaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test A Score16 weeks30.027 secondsStandard Deviation 12.642
Secondary

Evaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test B Score

The Trailmaking B score is the number of seconds spent connecting numbered circles (1-13) to circles containing letters of the alphabet (A-L) in alternating sequential order. A maximum of 300 seconds is allowed. Score ranges from 0-300. Higher score reflects poorer outcome.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSEvaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test B ScoreBaseline68.411 secondsStandard Deviation 32.106
LFR rTMSEvaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test B Score16 weeks56.439 secondsStandard Deviation 16.723
Sham TreatmentEvaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test B ScoreBaseline71.432 secondsStandard Deviation 42.1
Sham TreatmentEvaluation of Brain Injury as Assessed by the Trailmaking Test B Score16 weeks68.015 secondsStandard Deviation 25.023
Secondary

Fatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

The FSS is a 9-item questionnaire which measures the severity of fatigue and how it interferes with certain activities. The items are scored on a 7-point scale with 1=strongly disagree and 7=strongly agree. The score ranges from 9 to a maximum of 63. A higher score reflects greater fatigue severity.

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)4 weeks28.385 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.788
LFR rTMSFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)12 weeks23.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.787
LFR rTMSFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)8 weeks20.769 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.116
LFR rTMSFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)16 weeks21.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.02
LFR rTMSFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)Baseline28.308 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.124
Sham TreatmentFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)16 weeks29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.274
Sham TreatmentFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)Baseline41.176 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.975
Sham TreatmentFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)4 weeks23.375 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.362
Sham TreatmentFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)8 weeks29.938 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.643
Sham TreatmentFatigue Severity as Assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)12 weeks27.286 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.168
Secondary

Immediate Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)

BVMT is used to evaluate visuospatial memory abilities in neuropsychological populations. A visual display of six simple figures arranged in a 2 × 3 matrix on an 8 × 11 booklet is shown to participants for three consecutive 10-second trials. After each trial, participants are to draw as many designs as accurately as they can and in the correct location. Scoring of the immediate recall is based on the accuracy of the drawings and the location of the figures. For each figure, one point is awarded to each satisfactory domain resulting in a maximum of 12-points per trial, for a total score ranging from 0-36, with a higher score reflecting a better outcome.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSImmediate Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)Baseline22.846 accurately-drawn figuresStandard Deviation 9.547
LFR rTMSImmediate Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)16 weeks23.231 accurately-drawn figuresStandard Deviation 8.833
Sham TreatmentImmediate Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)Baseline24.313 accurately-drawn figuresStandard Deviation 7.355
Sham TreatmentImmediate Recall as Assessed by Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)16 weeks21.438 accurately-drawn figuresStandard Deviation 6.593
Secondary

Immediate Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)

The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) consists of a 12-item word list, composed of four words from each of the three semantic categories. The subject is instructed to listen carefully as the examiner reads the word list and attempt to memorize the words. The word list is then read to the subject at the approximate rate of one word every 2 seconds. This is done for three trials. The number of correctly-recalled words in each trial is recorded (maximum of 12). The score is a sum of all the correctly-recalled words from each trial, for a maximum score of 36.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSImmediate Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline23.077 sum of correctly-recalled wordsStandard Deviation 5.722
LFR rTMSImmediate Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)16 weeks23.538 sum of correctly-recalled wordsStandard Deviation 7.287
Sham TreatmentImmediate Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)Baseline25.938 sum of correctly-recalled wordsStandard Deviation 5.285
Sham TreatmentImmediate Recall as Assessed by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)16 weeks25.5 sum of correctly-recalled wordsStandard Deviation 5.279
Secondary

Mean Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)

MOCA is designed to assess cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. It is composed of the following: Visuospatial and Executive Functioning: 5 points Animal Naming: 3 points Attention: 6 points Language: 3 points Abstraction: 2 points Delayed Recall (Short-term Memory): 5 points Orientation: 6 points Education Level: 1 point is added to the test-taker's score if he or she has 12 years or less of formal education. Score ranges 0-31, with ≥ 26 being normal cognitive function. The lower the score, the greater the level of cognitive impairment.

Time frame: Mean at baseline and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSMean Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)16 weeks26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.342
LFR rTMSMean Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)Baseline25.769 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.619
Sham TreatmentMean Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)Baseline26.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.141
Sham TreatmentMean Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)16 weeks26.875 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.442
Secondary

Mean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire

The GAD-7 questionnaire is used as a screening tool and severity measure for generalized anxiety disorder. The scale ranges from 0 - 21. 0-4 = normal 5-9 = mild 10-14 = moderate \>15 = severe

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire4 weeks7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.375
LFR rTMSMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire12 weeks6.923 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.423
LFR rTMSMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire8 weeks6.917 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.417
LFR rTMSMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire16 weeks7.538 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.603
LFR rTMSMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 QuestionnaireBaseline12.636 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.61
Sham TreatmentMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire16 weeks7.412 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.853
Sham TreatmentMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 QuestionnaireBaseline12.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Sham TreatmentMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire4 weeks7.824 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.028
Sham TreatmentMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire8 weeks7.588 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.874
Sham TreatmentMean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) - 7 Questionnaire12 weeks7.688 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.594
Secondary

Mean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

The PSQI score scale ranges from 0-21. 0 = very good sleep quality 21 = very bad sleep quality A total score of 5 or greater is indicative of poor sleep quality (reflecting a higher level of fatigue)

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)4 weeks10.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.585
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)12 weeks9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.758
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)8 weeks9.846 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.356
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)16 weeks9.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.913
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Baseline13.846 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.848
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)16 weeks9.625 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.793
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Baseline13.688 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.591
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)4 weeks10.647 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.133
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)8 weeks10.176 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.877
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by Patient Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)12 weeks10.235 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.161
Secondary

Mean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

The ESS is used to determine the level of daytime sleepiness. It is a questionnaire composed of 8 questions. The participant answers each question on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=no sleepiness, 1= mild sleepiness, 2= moderate sleepiness, 3= severe sleepiness). The total score is the sum of all responses for a maximum score of 24. A higher score reflects increased sleepiness.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)4 weeks5.846 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.896
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)12 weeks6.667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.015
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)8 weeks5.923 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.883
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)16 weeks6.077 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.609
LFR rTMSMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Baseline9.769 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.746
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)16 weeks6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.857
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Baseline9.412 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.81
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)4 weeks7.563 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.381
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)8 weeks6.063 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.586
Sham TreatmentMean Level of Fatigue as Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)12 weeks7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.536
Secondary

Mean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)

The DTS is a 17-item self-reported measure that assesses the 17 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Items are rated on 5-point frequency (0 = not at all to 4 = every day) and severity scales (0 = not at all distressing to 4 = extremely distressing). The DTS yields a frequency score (ranging from 0 to 68), severity score (ranging from 0 to 68), and total score (ranging from 0 to 136). The severity score will be used to assess this outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)4 weeks15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.01
LFR rTMSMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)12 weeks14.833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.938
LFR rTMSMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)8 weeks11.462 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.711
LFR rTMSMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)16 weeks16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.243
LFR rTMSMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)Baseline34.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.306
Sham TreatmentMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)16 weeks18.647 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.581
Sham TreatmentMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)Baseline41.706 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.769
Sham TreatmentMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)4 weeks24.063 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.657
Sham TreatmentMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)8 weeks17.294 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.711
Sham TreatmentMean Trauma Severity as Assessed by the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)12 weeks27.125 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.478
Secondary

Overall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire

The SWL is a 7-point Likert-style response scale. The possible range of scores is 5-35, with a score of 20 representing a neutral point on the scale. Scores between 5-9 indicate the respondent is extremely dissatisfied with life, whereas scores between 31-35 indicate the respondent is extremely satisfied.

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire4 weeks21.538 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.511
LFR rTMSOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire12 weeks22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.524
LFR rTMSOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire8 weeks22.231 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.207
LFR rTMSOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire16 weeks23.923 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.898
LFR rTMSOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) QuestionnaireBaseline14.231 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.132
Sham TreatmentOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire16 weeks18.647 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.367
Sham TreatmentOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) QuestionnaireBaseline10.625 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.015
Sham TreatmentOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire4 weeks18.471 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.769
Sham TreatmentOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire8 weeks17.647 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.88
Sham TreatmentOverall Satisfaction With Life as Assessed by the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) Questionnaire12 weeks17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.809
Secondary

Presence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)

The NBRS is a 28-item interview which includes a test of orientation and memory for recent events, questions regarding emotional state, post-concussional symptoms, focused attention, and concentration (performing serial sevens), explanation of proverbs, tasks of planning and mental flexibility, and delayed recall of three objects presented at the beginning of a session. Observations are also made regarding the patient's fatigability, visible signs of anxiety, disinhibition, agitation, hostility, difficulties in expressive and receptive communication, and disturbance of mood. The balance of the items are rated according to the patient's performance on brief tasks and quality of answers to interview questions. Each of the 28 items are scored on a scale of 0 (not severe) to 6 (extremely severe), for a maximum score of 168. A higher score reflects increased severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)4 weeks40.545 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.709
LFR rTMSPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)12 weeks43.222 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.072
LFR rTMSPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)8 weeks44.222 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.498
LFR rTMSPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)16 weeks39.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.866
LFR rTMSPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)Baseline51.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.89
Sham TreatmentPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)16 weeks40.375 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.513
Sham TreatmentPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)Baseline56.125 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.683
Sham TreatmentPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)4 weeks40.727 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.837
Sham TreatmentPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)8 weeks42.786 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.116
Sham TreatmentPresence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms as Assessed by Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS)12 weeks39.273 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.056
Secondary

Presence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)

Participants are asked to rate the severity of 16 different symptoms over the past 24 hours, on a severity scale from 0 to 4 (0 = not experienced, 1 = no more of a problem, 2 = mild problem, 3 = moderate problem, 4 = severe problem). The 16 symptoms include: headaches, dizziness, nausea and/or vomiting, hyperacusis, sleep disturbance, fatigue, being irritable, feeling depressed, feeling frustrated, forgetfulness, poor concentration, taking longer to think, blurred vision, light sensitivity, double vision, restlessness. Score ranges from 0 to 64, with a higher score reflecting increased severity of post-concussive symptoms.

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)4 weeks11.833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.747
LFR rTMSPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)12 weeks12.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.009
LFR rTMSPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)8 weeks14.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.753
LFR rTMSPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)16 weeks10.538 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.817
LFR rTMSPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)Baseline26.769 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.719
Sham TreatmentPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)16 weeks14.294 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.886
Sham TreatmentPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)Baseline23.125 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.184
Sham TreatmentPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)4 weeks11.765 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.451
Sham TreatmentPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)8 weeks11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.075
Sham TreatmentPresence of Post-concussive Symptoms as Assessed by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ)12 weeks11.857 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.369
Secondary

Presence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)

The STC reflects the level of social contact. The score ranges from 0-10, with 0= excellent contact, 10=no contact. A higher score reflects poorer social contact.

Time frame: Mean at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LFR rTMSPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)4 weeks3.077 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.706
LFR rTMSPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)12 weeks2.846 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.573
LFR rTMSPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)8 weeks2.769 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.536
LFR rTMSPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)16 weeks2.846 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.676
LFR rTMSPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)Baseline3.154 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.573
Sham TreatmentPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)16 weeks3.471 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.065
Sham TreatmentPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)Baseline4.563 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.065
Sham TreatmentPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)4 weeks3.765 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.855
Sham TreatmentPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)8 weeks3.471 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Sham TreatmentPresence of Social Connections as Assessed by the Social Ties Checklist (STC)12 weeks3.688 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.243

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026