Skip to content

Assessment of an Automatic Closed-loop Insulin Delivery System

Assessment of an Automatic Closed-loop Insulin Delivery System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02366767
Enrollment
21
Registered
2015-02-19
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2017-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Insulin Infusion Systems, Continuous Glucose Monitors

Brief summary

The overall aim of this research proposal is to determine the safety, feasibility and efficacy of an automatic closed-loop insulin delivery system.

Detailed description

This study will be completed in two parts. The initial part of this study will be an inpatient evaluation of the system with the primary goal of assessing safety and feasibility. This will involve 8 subjects with type 1 diabetes, aged 14 - 40 years, admitted for up to 60 hour. Plasma glucose levels will be collected hourly and tested by YSI (YSI 2300, Yellow Springs Instrument). These studies will be performed at Stanford University and will include group sporting activities to mimic the diabetes camp environment. Capillary blood glucose testing will be performed every 2-3 hours before meals, snacks, exercise, and prebed by subjects with research staff supervision during the day and at 00:00, 03:00 and 07:00 by research staff. These data will be reviewed by the DSMB before proceeding to camp studies. The second part of this study will be to test the efficacy of the system during diabetes summer camps. We will test the system in subjects with type 1 diabetes, aged 14-40 years, attending diabetes camp. There will be 20 subjects recruited, with 10 subjects randomized to the control arm Medtronic 530G system with threshold suspend (control group) and 10 subjects randomized to the automatic closed-loop insulin delivery (intervention group). Capillary blood glucose testing will be performed every 2-3 hours before meals, snacks, exercise and prebed by subjects with research staff supervision and at 00:00, 03:00 and 07:00 by research staff. The primary aim of this study is to generate preliminary data of system safety and efficacy in a closely supervised environment that challenges glucose control.

Interventions

DEVICEAutomatic closed-loop insulin delivery

Sensor transmit glucose data every 5 minutes to the control algorithm which adjusts insulin delivery every 5 minutes.

DEVICEControl

Threshold suspend

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes * The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment * C peptide levels and antibody determinations are not required 2. Daily insulin therapy for ≥ 12 months 3. Insulin pump therapy for ≥ 3 months 4. Age 14.0 - 40.0 years 5. Subject comprehends written English 6. Female subjects who are sexually active must be on acceptable method of contraception e.g. oral contraceptive pill, diaphragm, IUD 7. Female subjects past menarche must have a negative urine pregnancy test 8. Informed consent form is signed by the subject and/or parent and assent assigned by the subject if under 18 years of age 9. For subjects under 18 years, both the subject and parent/guardian understand the study protocol and agree to comply with it. Both parents must sign if possible.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has a medical disorder that in the judgment of the investigator will affect the wearing of the devices or the completion of any aspect of the protocol 2. Diabetic ketoacidosis in the past month 3. Hypoglycemic seizure or loss of consciousness or an event requiring glucagon or IV glucose in the past 3 months 4. Subject has a respiratory condition such as asthma, treated with systemic or inhaled corticosteroids in the previous 6 months or cystic fibrosis 5. Subject has a history of any cardiac or vascular disorder such as myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass surgery, coronary artery stenting, transient ischemic attack, cerebrovascular accident, angina, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia or thromboembolic disease 6. Subject has a history of liver or kidney disease (other than microalbuminuria) 7. Subject has active Graves' disease 8. Subjects with inadequately treated thyroid disease or celiac disease 9. Subject has a neurologic disorder that in the judgment of the investigator will affect completion of the protocol 10. Subject has a history of diagnosed medical eating disorder 11. Subject has a history of known illicit drug abuse 12. Subject has a history of known prescription drug abuse 13. Subject has a history of current alcohol abuse 14. Subject has a history of visual impairment which would not allow subject to participate 15. Subject has an active skin condition that would affect sensor placement 16. Subject has adhesive allergies 17. Subjects requiring an intermediate or long-acting insulin (such as NPH, detemir or glargine) 18. Subjects requiring other anti-diabetic medications other than insulin (oral or injectable) 19. Current use of oral/inhaled glucocorticoids or other medications, which in the judgment of the investigator would be a contraindication to participation in the study 20. Subject is currently on beta blocker medication 21. Subject is currently participating in another investigational study (drug or device) 22. Subject is deemed by the investigator to be unwilling or unable to follow the protocol 23. Presence of a febrile illness within 24 hours of enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes6 days1. As measured by the number of events of plasma glucose values ≤ 50 mg/dL OR frequency of system alerts preceding a plasma glucose value of ≤ 50 mg/dL in all subjects 2. As measured by the number of events of system alerts of plasma glucose values \>300 mg/dL lasting for more than one hour in all subjects. 3. As measured by number of events of serum ketones \>3 mmol/L in all subjects 4. As measured by the number of events meeting the criteria for severe hypoglycemia, defined as hypoglycemic seizure, loss of consciousness or coma or an event requiring administration of glucagon or IV glucose in all subjects

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Using the Automatic Closed Loop Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes6 days1. As measured by the system initiating and operating properly for at least 75% of the time for 75% of subjects. 2. As measure by the completion of study enrollment procedures and education on system use within 2 hours for 75% of the subjects.
Efficacy of Hybrid Closed-loop System in Comparison With Control6 daysAs measured by overall mean sensor glucose percent time in range 70-180 mg/dL.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects for the Inpatients studies at Stanford were recruited from the Packard Diabetes clinics. Subjects for the camp studies were recruited from patients who had completed registration forms to attend camp. They were sent a letter describing the study and if they were interested they contacted us.

Pre-assignment details

one subject enrolled in the closed-loop group had to leave camp after 24 hours and was replaced.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Automatic Closed-loop Insulin Delivery
The closed-loop arm will consist of participants wearing a sensor and transmitter which transmits sensor glucose data. The algorithm determines insulin delivery rates and this is delivered in microboluses every 5 minutes Automatic closed-loop insulin delivery: Sensor transmit glucose data every 5 minutes to the control algorithm which adjusts insulin delivery every 5 minutes.
11
Control
The subjects in the control arm will wear the 530G system using Enlite and MiniLink transmitter and threshold suspend. Control: Threshold suspend
10
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyleft for home after 1 day at camp10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAutomatic Closed-loop Insulin DeliveryControlTotal
Age, Continuous19.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
17.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
18.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
Hemoglobin A1c8.5 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
8.6 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
8.6 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants10 participants21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 111 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Safety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

1. As measured by the number of events of plasma glucose values ≤ 50 mg/dL OR frequency of system alerts preceding a plasma glucose value of ≤ 50 mg/dL in all subjects 2. As measured by the number of events of system alerts of plasma glucose values \>300 mg/dL lasting for more than one hour in all subjects. 3. As measured by number of events of serum ketones \>3 mmol/L in all subjects 4. As measured by the number of events meeting the criteria for severe hypoglycemia, defined as hypoglycemic seizure, loss of consciousness or coma or an event requiring administration of glucagon or IV glucose in all subjects

Time frame: 6 days

Population: 10 subjects who completed study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Automatic Closed-loop Insulin DeliverySafety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesPlasma glucose <50 mg/dL9 Events
Automatic Closed-loop Insulin DeliverySafety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesPlasma glucose >300 mg/dL lasting more than 1 hour0 Events
Automatic Closed-loop Insulin DeliverySafety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesSerum Ketones >3 mmol/L0 Events
Automatic Closed-loop Insulin DeliverySafety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesSevere Hypoglycemia0 Events
ControlSafety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesSevere Hypoglycemia1 Events
ControlSafety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesPlasma glucose <50 mg/dL6 Events
ControlSafety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesSerum Ketones >3 mmol/L0 Events
ControlSafety of Automatic Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesPlasma glucose >300 mg/dL lasting more than 1 hour0 Events
Secondary

Efficacy of Hybrid Closed-loop System in Comparison With Control

As measured by overall mean sensor glucose percent time in range 70-180 mg/dL.

Time frame: 6 days

Population: Including only sensor data where the daily median ARD \<15%.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Automatic Closed-loop Insulin DeliveryEfficacy of Hybrid Closed-loop System in Comparison With Control69.9 Percent timeStandard Error 3.3
ControlEfficacy of Hybrid Closed-loop System in Comparison With Control73.1 Percent timeStandard Error 5
Secondary

Feasibility of Using the Automatic Closed Loop Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

1. As measured by the system initiating and operating properly for at least 75% of the time for 75% of subjects. 2. As measure by the completion of study enrollment procedures and education on system use within 2 hours for 75% of the subjects.

Time frame: 6 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Automatic Closed-loop Insulin DeliveryFeasibility of Using the Automatic Closed Loop Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesOperational System >75% time10 participants
Automatic Closed-loop Insulin DeliveryFeasibility of Using the Automatic Closed Loop Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesEducation completed within 2 hours10 participants
ControlFeasibility of Using the Automatic Closed Loop Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesOperational System >75% time10 participants
ControlFeasibility of Using the Automatic Closed Loop Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesEducation completed within 2 hours10 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026