Skip to content

A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus (+) Paclitaxel With or Without Bevacizumab Compared With Carboplatin+Paclitaxel+Bevacizumab in Participants With Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A, Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) in Combination With Carboplatin+Paclitaxel With or Without Bevacizumab Compared With Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Bevacizumab in Chemotherapy-Naïve Patients With Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02366143
Acronym
IMpower150
Enrollment
1202
Registered
2015-02-19
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2020-12-07
Last updated
2021-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Brief summary

This randomized, open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (an engineered anti-programmed death-ligand 1 \[PD-L1\] antibody) in combination with carboplatin+paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab compared with treatment with carboplatin+paclitaxel+bevacizumab in chemotherapy-naïve participants with Stage IV non-squamous NSCLC. Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to Arm A (Atezolizumab+Carboplatin+Paclitaxel), Arm B (Atezolizumab+Carboplatin+Paclitaxel+Bevacizumab), or Arm C (Carboplatin+Paclitaxel+Bevacizumab).

Interventions

Atezolizumab was administered as IV infusion at a dose of 1200 milligrams (mg) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until loss of clinical benefit.

DRUGBevacizumab

Bevacizumab was administered as IV infusion at a dose of 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death.

DRUGCarboplatin

Carboplatin was administered at area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 6 milligrams per milliliter per minute (mg/mL/min) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first.

DRUGPaclitaxel

Paclitaxel was administered as IV infusion at a dose of 200 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 * Histologically or cytologically confirmed, Stage IV non-squamous NSCLC * Participants with no prior treatment for Stage IV non-squamous NSCLC * Known PD-L1 status as determined by immunohistochemistry assay performed on previously obtained archival tumor tissue or tissue obtained from a biopsy at screening * Measurable disease as defined by RECIST v1.1 * Adequate hematologic and end organ function

Exclusion criteria

Cancer-Specific Exclusions: * Active or untreated central nervous system metastases * Malignancies other than NSCLC within 5 years prior to randomization, with the exception of those with a negligible risk of metastasis or death treated with expected curative outcome General Medical Exclusions: * Pregnant or lactating women * History of autoimmune disease * History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest computed tomography scan. History of radiation pneumonitis in the radiation field (fibrosis) is permitted * Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus * Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C * Severe infection within 4 weeks prior to randomization * Significant cardiovascular disease * Illness or condition that interferes with the participant's capacity to understand, follow and/or comply with study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in the Teff-high WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first until data cut-off on 15 September 2017 (up to approximately 29 months)Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Arm B versus Arm C in the T-effector (Teff)-high wild type (WT) population and the intent-to-treat (ITT)-WT population.
Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT PopulationBaseline until death until data cut-off on 22 January 2018 (up to approximately 34 months)Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population
Overall Survival (OS) in Arm A Versus Arm C in ITT-WT PopulationBaseline until death (up approximately 53 months)Overall Survival (OS) in Arm A Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)PFS as Determined by the Investigator according to RECIST v1.1, in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup: TC2/3 or 1C2/3 and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (ITT-WT Population)
OS in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupBaseline until death (up to approximately 34 months)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup: TC2/3 or 1C2/3 and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (ITT-WT Population)
OS in Arm A Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupBaseline until death (up approximately 53 months)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup: TC2/3 or 1C2/3 and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (ITT-WT Population)
OS in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationBaseline until death (up to approximately 34 months)
OS in Arm A Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationBaseline until death (up approximately 53 months)
OS in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationBaseline until death (up approximately 53 months)
Duration of Response (DOR), as Determined By Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm CBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)DOR, as determined by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 in Arm B versus Arm C in the Teff high-WT population and the ITT-WT population.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator in the Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]) as Determined by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1 in the Teff-High-WT population and ITT-WT population.
OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm CBaseline to 2 years or death, whichever occurs first.OS at 1- and 2-year landmark timepoints in Teff-high WT population and ITT-WT population.
OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm CBaseline to 2 years or death, whichever occurs first.OS at 1- and 2-year landmark timepoints in Teff-high WT population and ITT-WT population.
PFS, as Determined by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)PFS, as determined by the independent review facility (IRF) Using RECIST v1.1 in Arm B versus Arm C in the T-effector (Teff)-high wild type (WT) population and the intent-to-treat (ITT)-WT population.
TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreBaseline up to approximately 29 monthsQLQ-LC13 Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module incorporates one multiple-item scale to assess dyspnea and a series of single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. 2001). All EORTC scales and single-item measures are linearly transformed so that each score has a range of 0-100. A high score for a functional/global health status scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning/HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life); however, a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. A ≥10-point change in the symptoms subscale score is perceived by patients as clinically significant (Osoba et al. 1998).
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) ScaleBaseline up to approximately 29 monthsThe SILC (Symptoms in Lung Cancer) scale was used to assess patient-reported severity of lung cancer symptoms (chest pain, dyspnea, and cough). The SILC scale is a 9-item content validated self-report measure of lung cancer symptoms. It measures severity of cough, dyspnea, and chest pain with a symptom severity score. The SILC questionnaire comprises three individual symptoms (dyspnea, cough, chest pain) and are scored at the individual symptom level, thus have a dyspnea score, chest pain score, and cough score. Each individual symptom score is calculated as the average of responses for the symptom items \[e.g. Chest Pain Score=mean (item 1; item 2)\]. An increase in score is suggestive of a worsening in symptomology (i.e. frequency or severity). A score change of ≥0.3 points for the dyspnea and cough symptom scores is considered to be clinically significant; whereas a score change of ≥0.5 points for the chest pain score is considered to be clinically significant.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse EventsBaseline up to data cutoff date 7 December 2020 (up to approximately 68 months)Percentage of participants with at least one adverse event.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to AtezolizumabBaseline up to approximately 29 months
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab in Arm A and Arm BDay 1 of Cycle 1 and 3 (Cycle length=21 days)The predose samples will be collected on the same day of treatment administration. The infusion duration of atezolizumab will be of 30-60 minutes.
Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BDay 21 of Cycles 1, 2 3, and 7 (Cycle length=21 days)
Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CPredose (same day of treatment administration), 5-10 minutes before end of carboplatin infusion, 1 h after carboplatin infusion (infusion duration=15 to 30 minutes) on D1 of Cy1,3 (Cycle length=21 days)
Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CPredose (same day of treatment administration), 5-10 minutes before end of paclitaxel infusion, 1 h after paclitaxel infusion (infusion duration=3 h) on D1 of Cy1,3 (Cycle length=21 days)
Cmax of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Cycle length=21 days)
Cmin of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 21 (Cycle length=21 days)
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreBaseline up to approximately 29 monthsEORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated & reliable self-report measure (Aaronson et al.1993;Fitzsimmons et al.1999) that consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of patient functioning (physical,emotional,role, cognitive,and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea & vomiting, pain),global health/quality of life,and six single items (dyspnea,insomnia, appetite loss,constipation,diarrhea, and financial difficulties). EORTC QLQ-C30 is scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. 2001). All EORTC scales and single-item measures are linearly transformed so that each score has a range of 0-100. A high score for a functional/global health status scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning/HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life);however a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. A ≥10-point change in the symptoms subscale score is perceived by patients as clinically significant (Osoba et al.1998).
PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High Population and ITT PopulationBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)PFS, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, in Arm B versus C in the Teff high population and ITT population.
PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)PFS, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, in Arm A versus B in the Teff high-WT population and ITT-WT population.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm C
Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin
400
Arm B
Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin
400
Arm A
Atezolizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin
402
Total1,202

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath307278280
Overall StudyIncreased Microscopic RBCS on Urinalysis010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up242
Overall StudyPatient continue same treatment via Post Trial Access Progarm (PTAP)001
Overall StudyPatient moved to commercial atezolizumab use0117
Overall StudyPatient moved to commercial stock001
Overall StudyPatient moved to roll-over study11928
Overall StudyPatient moving onto PTAP commercial stock010
Overall StudyPatient rolling over to patient assistance program001
Overall StudyPatient stopped treatment due to disease progression;didn't enter follow up due to study termination001
Overall StudyPatient switched to PTAP010
Overall StudyPhysician Decision121
Overall StudyPI Move and Site Closure101
Overall StudyPost Trial Migration010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation002
Overall StudyRandomization Error100
Overall StudyRequester's instructions111
Overall StudySponsor request to withdraw/discontinue patient060
Overall StudySponsor request to withdraw/discontinue patient in survival follow up705752
Overall StudyStudy Terminated By Sponsor002
Overall StudyUneligible010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject161722

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm CArm BArm ATotal
Age, Continuous63.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
63.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
62.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
62.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
46 Participants56 Participants48 Participants150 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants3 Participants9 Participants24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants13 Participants10 Participants29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
335 Participants322 Participants331 Participants988 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
161 Participants160 Participants161 Participants482 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
239 Participants240 Participants241 Participants720 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
311 / 394285 / 393293 / 400
other
Total, other adverse events
381 / 394375 / 393385 / 400
serious
Total, serious adverse events
142 / 394190 / 393170 / 400

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS) in Arm A Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population

Overall Survival (OS) in Arm A Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population

Time frame: Baseline until death (up approximately 53 months)

Population: ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Overall Survival (OS) in Arm A Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population19.0 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Overall Survival (OS) in Arm A Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population14.7 Months
p-value: 0.052895% CI: [0.707, 1.002]Log Rank
Primary

Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population

Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population

Time frame: Baseline until death until data cut-off on 22 January 2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

Population: ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population19.2 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population14.7 Months
p-value: 0.016495% CI: [0.64, 0.96]Log Rank
Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in the Teff-high WT Population and ITT-WT Population

Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Arm B versus Arm C in the T-effector (Teff)-high wild type (WT) population and the intent-to-treat (ITT)-WT population.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first until data cut-off on 15 September 2017 (up to approximately 29 months)

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in the Teff-high WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT Population11.3 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in the Teff-high WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population8.3 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in the Teff-high WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT Population6.8 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Progression Free Survival (PFS), as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in the Teff-high WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population6.8 Months
Comparison: ITT-WT populationp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.52, 0.74]Log Rank
Comparison: Teff-high WT Populationp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.38, 0.68]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Score Using the Symptoms in Lung Cancer (SILC) Scale

The SILC (Symptoms in Lung Cancer) scale was used to assess patient-reported severity of lung cancer symptoms (chest pain, dyspnea, and cough). The SILC scale is a 9-item content validated self-report measure of lung cancer symptoms. It measures severity of cough, dyspnea, and chest pain with a symptom severity score. The SILC questionnaire comprises three individual symptoms (dyspnea, cough, chest pain) and are scored at the individual symptom level, thus have a dyspnea score, chest pain score, and cough score. Each individual symptom score is calculated as the average of responses for the symptom items \[e.g. Chest Pain Score=mean (item 1; item 2)\]. An increase in score is suggestive of a worsening in symptomology (i.e. frequency or severity). A score change of ≥0.3 points for the dyspnea and cough symptom scores is considered to be clinically significant; whereas a score change of ≥0.5 points for the chest pain score is considered to be clinically significant.

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 29 months

Population: No participants were analyzed due to psychometric properties within the NSCLC population are still being determined. Due to quality issues data not analyzed.

Secondary

Cmax of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm C

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Cycle length=21 days)

Population: The pharmacokinetic-evaluable population is defined as all patients who received any dose of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, or paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples post-dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Cmax of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 1 Day 1329 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 129
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Cmax of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 3 Day 1413 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 126
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Cmax of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 1 Day 1323 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 95
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Cmax of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 3 Day 1430 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 123
Secondary

Cmin of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm C

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 21 (Cycle length=21 days)

Population: The pharmacokinetic-evaluable population is defined as all patients who received any dose of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, or paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples post-dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Cmin of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 2 Day 2198.0 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 50.9
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Cmin of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 1 Day 1NA mcg/mL
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Cmin of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 2 Day 2190.4 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 36.8
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Cmin of Bevacizumab in Arm B and Arm CCycle 1 Day 1NA mcg/mL
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR), as Determined By Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C

DOR, as determined by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 in Arm B versus Arm C in the Teff high-WT population and the ITT-WT population.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Duration of Response (DOR), as Determined By Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm CTeff high-WT Population11.2 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Duration of Response (DOR), as Determined By Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm CITT-WT Population9.0 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Duration of Response (DOR), as Determined By Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm CTeff high-WT Population5.7 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Duration of Response (DOR), as Determined By Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm CITT-WT Population5.7 Months
Comparison: ITT-WTp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.406, 0.675]Log Rank
Comparison: Teff-high WTp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.283, 0.624]Log Rank
Secondary

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab in Arm A and Arm B

The predose samples will be collected on the same day of treatment administration. The infusion duration of atezolizumab will be of 30-60 minutes.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 3 (Cycle length=21 days)

Population: The pharmacokinetic-evaluable population is defined as all patients who received any dose of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, or paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples post-dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab in Arm A and Arm BCycle 1 Day 1410 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 157
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab in Arm A and Arm BCycle 3 Day 1498 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 160
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab in Arm A and Arm BCycle 1 Day 1414 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 127
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab in Arm A and Arm BCycle 3 Day 1540 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 198
Secondary

Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm B

Time frame: Day 21 of Cycles 1, 2 3, and 7 (Cycle length=21 days)

Population: The pharmacokinetic-evaluable population is defined as all patients who received any dose of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, or paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples post-dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BCycle 1 Day 2176.4 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 37.7
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BCycle 2 Day 21119 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 55.7
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BCycle 3 Day 21146 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 58.9
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BCycle 7 Day 21219 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 89.6
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BCycle 7 Day 21220 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 99
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BCycle 1 Day 2180.8 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 41.4
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BCycle 3 Day 21160 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 102
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab Prior to Infusion in Arm A and Arm BCycle 2 Day 21130 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 57.1
Secondary

OS in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT Population

Time frame: Baseline until death (up approximately 53 months)

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff High-WT Population21.3 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population19.0 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff High-WT Population25.8 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population19.5 Months
Comparison: Teff high-WT ITTp-value: 0.459995% CI: [0.683, 1.188]Log Rank
Secondary

OS in Arm A Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup

OS in Arm A Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup: TC2/3 or 1C2/3 and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (ITT-WT Population)

Time frame: Baseline until death (up approximately 53 months)

Population: PD-L1 WT populations are defined as the PD-L1 populations (TC2/3 or IC2/3 population or TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population) excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC2/3 or IC2/3 Population26.1 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 Population24.4 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC2/3 or IC2/3 Population17.0 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 Population16.0 Months
Comparison: TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 ITT-WTp-value: 0.007395% CI: [0.551, 0.913]Log Rank
Comparison: TC2/3 or IC2/3 Populationp-value: 0.009795% CI: [0.484, 0.907]Log Rank
Secondary

OS in Arm A Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT Population

Time frame: Baseline until death (up approximately 53 months)

Population: Teff-high WT population, defined as Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. Teff-high population, defined as patients in the ITT population with Teff signature expression \>=-1.91. ITT population is defined as all randomized patients, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationTeff-high WT Population21.3 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationTeff-high Population21.0 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationITT Population19.0 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationTeff-high WT Population16.3 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationTeff-high Population16.7 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm A Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationITT Population15.0 Months
Comparison: Teff high-WTp-value: 0.089495% CI: [0.595, 1.038]Log Rank
Comparison: Teff highp-value: 0.127695% CI: [0.626, 1.061]Log Rank
Comparison: ITTp-value: 0.068195% CI: [0.733, 1.011]Log Rank
Secondary

OS in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup

OS in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup: TC2/3 or 1C2/3 and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (ITT-WT Population)

Time frame: Baseline until death (up to approximately 34 months)

Population: The PD-L1-selected WT populations are defined as the PD-L1-selected populations (TC2/3 or IC2/3 population or TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population) excluding patients with a sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC 2/3 or IC2/3 Population22.2 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 Population22.5 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC 2/3 or IC2/3 Population16.7 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 Population16.4 Months
Comparison: TC2/3 or IC2/3, WT ITTp-value: 0.276595% CI: [0.58, 1.169]Log Rank
Comparison: TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3, WT ITTp-value: 0.082995% CI: [0.575, 1.035]Log Rank
Secondary

OS in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT Population

Time frame: Baseline until death (up to approximately 34 months)

Population: Teff-high WT population, defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. Teff-high population, defined as participants in the ITT population with Teff signature expression \>=-1.91. ITT population, defined as all randomized patients, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationITT Population19.8 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationTeff High-WT Population25.0 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationTeff High Population25.2 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationTeff High-WT Population16.7 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationTeff High Population16.7 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High-WT Population, Teff High Population, and ITT PopulationITT Population14.9 Months
Comparison: Teff high-WTp-value: 0.284395% CI: [0.592, 1.167]Log Rank
Comparison: Teff highp-value: 0.186195% CI: [0.579, 1.113]Log Rank
Comparison: ITTp-value: 0.00695% CI: [0.63, 0.926]Log Rank
Secondary

OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C

OS at 1- and 2-year landmark timepoints in Teff-high WT population and ITT-WT population.

Time frame: Baseline to 2 years or death, whichever occurs first.

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C1-Year Teff-high WT Population67.48 Percentage
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C2-Year Teff-high WT Population46.01 Percentage
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C1-Year ITT-WT Population64.06 Percentage
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C2-Year ITT-WT Population41.45 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C2-Year ITT-WT Population31.79 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C1-Year Teff-high WT Population56.92 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C1-Year ITT-WT Population59.89 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm A Versus Arm C2-Year Teff-high WT Population38.74 Percentage
Comparison: 2-Year Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.21295% CI: [-4.15, 18.69]Z-test
Comparison: 1-Year ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.262495% CI: [-3.13, 11.48]Z-test
Comparison: 2-Year ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.008895% CI: [2.43, 16.9]Z-test
Comparison: 1-Year Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.064995% CI: [-0.65, 21.77]Z-test
Secondary

OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C

OS at 1- and 2-year landmark timepoints in Teff-high WT population and ITT-WT population.

Time frame: Baseline to 2 years or death, whichever occurs first.

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C1-Year Teff-high WT Population68.63 Percentage
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C1-Year ITT-WT Population67.32 Percentage
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C2-Year Teff-high WT Population52.03 Percentage
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C2-Year ITT-WT Population43.42 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C2-Year ITT-WT Population33.71 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C1-Year Teff-high WT Population58.74 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C2-Year Teff-high WT Population41.70 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)OS Rates at Years 1 and 2 in Arm B Versus Arm C1-Year ITT-WT Population60.63 Percentage
Comparison: 1-Year ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.069795% CI: [-0.54, 13.9]Z-test
Comparison: 2-Year ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.034795% CI: [0.7, 18.73]Z-test
Comparison: 1-Year Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.08995% CI: [-1.51, 21.29]Z-test
Comparison: 2-Year Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.133695% CI: [-3.17, 23.84]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

Percentage of participants with at least one adverse event.

Time frame: Baseline up to data cutoff date 7 December 2020 (up to approximately 68 months)

Population: Safety population included all treated patients, defined as randomized patients who received any amount of any component of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events99.0 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events98.2 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events97.8 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator in the Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT Population

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]) as Determined by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1 in the Teff-High-WT population and ITT-WT population.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator in the Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT Population54.0 Percentage
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator in the Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population49.3 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator in the Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT Population69.3 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator in the Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population63.5 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator in the Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population48.0 Percentage
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (OR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Determined by the Investigator in the Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT Population53.5 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 29 months

Population: The baseline ADA-evaluable population for each study treatment included patients who had a baseline ADA result. The post-baseline ADA-evaluable population for each study treatment included patients who had at least one post-baseline ADA result and had received at least on dose of that study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab4.6 Percentage of Participants
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Atezolizumab2.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

PFS, as Determined by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT Population

PFS, as determined by the independent review facility (IRF) Using RECIST v1.1 in Arm B versus Arm C in the T-effector (Teff)-high wild type (WT) population and the intent-to-treat (ITT)-WT population.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT Population10.7 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population8.5 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT Population7.0 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff-High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT Population7.0 Months
Comparison: ITT-WT populationp-value: 0.000295% CI: [0.59, 0.85]Log Rank
Comparison: Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.000195% CI: [0.418, 0.76]Log Rank
Secondary

PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT Population

PFS, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, in Arm A versus B in the Teff high-WT population and ITT-WT population.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT6.3 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT6.3 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationTeff-high WT11.3 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm A Versus Arm B in Teff High-WT Population and ITT-WT PopulationITT-WT8.3 Months
Secondary

PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup

PFS as Determined by the Investigator according to RECIST v1.1, in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 Subgroup: TC2/3 or 1C2/3 and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (ITT-WT Population)

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)

Population: The PD-L1-selected WT populations are defined as the PD-L1-selected populations (TC2/3 or IC2/3 population or TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population) excluding patients with a sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC2/3 or IC2/3 Subgroup11.1 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 Subgroup11.0 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC2/3 or IC2/3 Subgroup6.8 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C by PD-L1 SubgroupTC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 Subgroup6.8 Months
Comparison: TC2/3 or IC2/3 Subgroupp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.352, 0.647]Log Rank
Comparison: TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 Subgroupp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.386, 0.639]Log Rank
Secondary

PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High Population and ITT Population

PFS, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, in Arm B versus C in the Teff high population and ITT population.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)

Population: Teff-high population is defined as the patients in the ITT population with Teff signature expression \>=-1.91. ITT population is defined as all randomized patients, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High Population and ITT PopulationTeff-high Population11.3 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High Population and ITT PopulationITT Population8.3 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High Population and ITT PopulationTeff-high Population6.8 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High Population and ITT PopulationITT Population6.8 Months
Comparison: Teff-high Populationp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.374, 0.649]Log Rank
Comparison: ITT Populationp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.517, 0.72]Log Rank
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm C

Time frame: Predose (same day of treatment administration), 5-10 minutes before end of carboplatin infusion, 1 h after carboplatin infusion (infusion duration=15 to 30 minutes) on D1 of Cy1,3 (Cycle length=21 days)

Population: The pharmacokinetic-evaluable population is defined as all patients who received any dose of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, or paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples post-dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 Before End of Infusion20900 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8330
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 After Infusion11700 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5570
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 After Infusion11700 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6990
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Pre-doseNA ng/mL
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy2D21176 ng/mLStandard Deviation 82.9
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Before End of Infusion18300 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9610
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy2D21190 ng/mLStandard Deviation 113
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 Before End of Infusion18700 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9410
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Before End of Infusion18300 ng/mLStandard Deviation 11900
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 After Infusion12200 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7480
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Pre-doseNA ng/mL
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 After Infusion13900 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14300
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 After Infusion10400 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4150
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Pre-doseNA ng/mL
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Before End of Infusion17200 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9860
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 After Infusion10100 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5320
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy2D21143 ng/mLStandard Deviation 73
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Carboplatin in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 Before End of Infusion20600 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12900
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm C

Time frame: Predose (same day of treatment administration), 5-10 minutes before end of paclitaxel infusion, 1 h after paclitaxel infusion (infusion duration=3 h) on D1 of Cy1,3 (Cycle length=21 days)

Population: The pharmacokinetic-evaluable population is defined as all patients who received any dose of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, or paclitaxel and who had evaluable PK samples post-dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 Before End Of Infusion5810 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3610
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 After Infusion1800 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1660
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Pre-doseNA ng/mL
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 After Infusion2300 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2790
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Before End of Infusion4850 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2800
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy2D21NA ng/mL
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 Before End Of Infusion7810 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4510
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Before End of Infusion6440 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3640
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 After Infusion2490 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3020
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 After Infusion2990 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5830
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy2D21NA ng/mL
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Pre-doseNA ng/mL
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 After Infusion1930 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1380
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Pre-doseNA ng/mL
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 Before End of Infusion5560 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2590
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy1D1 After Infusion1980 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1780
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Plasma Concentrations for Paclitaxel in Arm A, Arm B, and Arm CCy3D1 Before End Of Infusion7810 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5160
Secondary

Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated & reliable self-report measure (Aaronson et al.1993;Fitzsimmons et al.1999) that consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of patient functioning (physical,emotional,role, cognitive,and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea & vomiting, pain),global health/quality of life,and six single items (dyspnea,insomnia, appetite loss,constipation,diarrhea, and financial difficulties). EORTC QLQ-C30 is scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. 2001). All EORTC scales and single-item measures are linearly transformed so that each score has a range of 0-100. A high score for a functional/global health status scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning/HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life);however a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. A ≥10-point change in the symptoms subscale score is perceived by patients as clinically significant (Osoba et al.1998).

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 29 months

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnea in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnea in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnea in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnea in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnea in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnea in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Comparison: Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.689995% CI: [0.571, 1.45]Log Rank
Comparison: Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.104395% CI: [0.413, 1.089]Log Rank
Comparison: ITT WTp-value: 0.17395% CI: [0.912, 1.665]Log Rank
Comparison: ITT WTp-value: 0.614595% CI: [0.792, 1.483]Log Rank
Secondary

TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) Score

QLQ-LC13 Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module incorporates one multiple-item scale to assess dyspnea and a series of single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. 2001). All EORTC scales and single-item measures are linearly transformed so that each score has a range of 0-100. A high score for a functional/global health status scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning/HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life); however, a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. A ≥10-point change in the symptoms subscale score is perceived by patients as clinically significant (Osoba et al. 1998).

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 29 months

Population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreCough in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreDyspnea in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreChest Pain in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreArm and/or Shoulder Pain in Teff-high WTNA Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreCough in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreDyspnea in ITT-WT Population21.9 Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreArm and/or Shoulder Pain in ITT-WTNA Months
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScorePain in Chest in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreChest Pain in Teff-high WT Population22.2 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreArm and/or Shoulder Pain in ITT-WT19.5 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreArm and/or Shoulder Pain in Teff-high WT19.5 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreCough in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreDyspnea in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreCough in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreDyspnea in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScorePain in Chest in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreChest Pain in Teff-high WT Population18.4 Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreDyspnea in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreCough in Teff-high WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreArm and/or Shoulder Pain in Teff-high WTNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreArm and/or Shoulder Pain in ITT-WTNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreDyspnea in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScoreCough in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)TTD in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms as Determined by EORTC Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) ScorePain in Chest in ITT-WT PopulationNA Months
Comparison: Cough for Teff-high WT ITT populationp-value: 0.881695% CI: [0.614, 1.763]Log Rank
Comparison: Cough for Teff-high WT ITT Populationp-value: 0.299595% CI: [0.419, 1.309]Log Rank
Comparison: Dyspnea in Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.757895% CI: [0.616, 1.422]Log Rank
Comparison: Dyspnea in Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.84795% CI: [0.694, 1.56]Log Rank
Comparison: Pain in Chest in Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.128995% CI: [0.383, 1.133]Log Rank
Comparison: Pain in Chest in Teff-high WT Populationp-value: 0.238195% CI: [0.43, 1.235]Log Rank
Comparison: Arm and/or Shoulder Pain in Teff-high WTp-value: 0.716395% CI: [0.685, 1.732]Log Rank
Comparison: Arm and/or Shoulder Pain in Teff-high WTp-value: 0.150295% CI: [0.42, 1.145]Log Rank
Comparison: Cough in ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.956895% CI: [0.713, 1.43]Log Rank
Comparison: Cough in ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.537795% CI: [0.619, 1.284]Log Rank
Comparison: Dyspnea in ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.401295% CI: [0.685, 1.163]Log Rank
Comparison: Dyspnea in ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.714995% CI: [0.809, 1.363]Log Rank
Comparison: Arm and/or Shoulder Pain in ITT-WTp-value: 0.712695% CI: [0.786, 1.422]Log Rank
Comparison: Arm and/or Shoulder Pain in ITT-WTp-value: 0.605395% CI: [0.675, 1.258]Log Rank
Comparison: Pain in Chest in ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.313495% CI: [0.576, 1.194]Log Rank
Comparison: Pain in Chest in ITT-WT Populationp-value: 0.611595% CI: [0.633, 1.309]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026