Skip to content

Nutritional Counseling vs. Nutritional Supplements for NASH - a Randomized Prospective, Open Label Pilot Study

Nutritional Counseling Versus Nutritional Supplements for the Treatment of NASH - a Randomized Prospective, Open Label Pilot Study (Nuces NASH)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02366052
Acronym
NucesNASH
Enrollment
42
Registered
2015-02-19
Start date
2015-02-01
Completion date
2017-05-10
Last updated
2017-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fatty Liver, Nonalcoholic, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Keywords

Histologically confirmed NASH, Hepatocyte Injury determined by M30 antigen

Brief summary

The main aim of the study is to determine if an oral supplementation of the LCS has a beneficial effect by itself or even enhances the beneficial effects of a moderate life-style intervention on the progression of NAFLD in humans.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNutritional Counseling

Nutritional counseling by a trained nutritionist for 12 weeks.

The dietary supplement LCS (Yakult plus) will be given 2 times a day for 12 weeks in addition to dietary counseling every 3 weeks.

OTHERNutritional Counseling and LCS

Nutritional counseling by a trained nutritionist in addition to the dietary supplement LCS (2 times a day) for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

University of Jena
CollaboratorOTHER
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Elevated M30 antigen levels (cutoff: \>200 - 800 U/L) at screening AND hepatic steatosis on ultrasound OR histologically confirmed NASH \- Age 18 to 75 years

Exclusion criteria

* Alcohol intake of more than 30 g/d (men) or 20 g/d (women) * Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), Vitamin E or other investigational NASH drugs 3 months prior to randomization * Treatment with medications or substances that may induce secondary NASH (e.g., tamoxifen, corticosteroids, amiodarone, methotrexate) or ameliorate NASH (TNF-antagonists) * Treatment with phenprocoumon or warfarin * Hepatocellular carcinoma or non-hepatic malignancy * Decompensated cirrhosis (Child B,C) or a history of decompensation * Liver disease unrelated to NASH, including chronic viral hepatitis B/D or C, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson's disease or clinical manifest iron overload * Bariatric surgery within the last 5 years * BMI \<18,5 kg/m2 or BMI \>45 kg/m2 * Liver transplantation * Heart failure (New York Heart Association Class II - IV) * Myocardial infarction, instable coronary artery disease , coronary artery intervention or stroke in the previous 6 months * Instable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic inflammatory bowel disease or rheumatoid arthritis. * Instable renal insufficiency (changes in serum creatinin \> 50% in the last 3 month) or terminal renal insufficiency requiring dialysis * Uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure \> 180/90 despite therapy) * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus defined by hemoglobin A1c \> 9 * Food allergies requiring strictly dietary adherence * Pregnant or nursing women * Chronic pancreatitis or history of recurring acute pancreatitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of the M30 antigen in the serum12 and 24 weeksReduction of the M30 antigen as a validated measure of the degree of hepatocellular inflammation and injury

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in indicators of hepatocellular injury and fibrosis12 and 24 weeksChange in indicators of hepatocellular injury (ALT, gammaGT, M30/M60 antigen ratio, ELF score), proinflammatory cytokines (hsCRP, ferritin, plasminogen activator-1, endotoxin), surrogate parameters of liver fibrosis (fibrosis marker panels, Fibrotest, ELF score) and relative liver stiffness (assessed by Fibro Scan)
Change in metabolic risk factors12 and 24 weeksChanges in metabolic risk factors (BMI, waist circumference, Homeostasis Model Assessment/Matsuda Score, serum lipids), changes in oral glucose tolerance and changes in hepatic steatosis will be assessed.
Saftey and tolerability12 and 24 weeksSafety is assessed by (1) clinical examination, (2) clinical chemistries including serum electrolytes, renal, liver function tests and markers of pancreatic injury.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in measures of nutritional physiology12 and 24 weeksImprovement of nutritional physiology, compliance, self-perceived efficacy, emotional eating behavior using a validated questionnaires.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026