Skip to content

2D Versus 3D Laparoscopic Training on a Virtual Reality Simulator

2D Versus 3D Laparoscopic Training on a Virtual Reality Simulator - A Randomised Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02361463
Enrollment
32
Registered
2015-02-11
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2018-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stereoscopic Vision

Keywords

Laparoscopy;, Training;, Three-Dimensional

Brief summary

Laparoscopy training programs with virtual reality simulators are widely used before new surgeons are allowed to operate on patients. Laparoscopic surgery results in shorter time to recover, less surgical trauma and thereby a shorter stay at the hospital compared with open surgery. However, it is more difficult to learn laparoscopic surgery, than open surgery, in part because surgeons have to work in a 3-dimensional space, through a 2-dimensional interface on a screen. This results in loss of depth perception and therefore a higher visual and cognitive load. This trial examines if using 3D vision instead of 2D vision on the laparoscopic virtual reality simulator reduces the time to reach proficiency, by decreasing the cognitive and visual load during practice on a Virtual Reality Simulator.

Interventions

DEVICE3D vision

Laparoscopic simulator training to proficiency under 3D conditions

DEVICE2D vision

Laparoscopic simulator training to proficiency under 2D conditions

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Residents working in Denmark. Participants are required to have a medical license and provide informed consent before inclusion

Exclusion criteria

1. Participation in prior studies involving laparoscopic training. 2. Experience with laparoscopy surgery (having performed minimum one laparoscopic procedure as primary surgeon, including supervised procedures). 3. Performing more than 3 supervised laparoscopy surgeries during the intervention. 4. Performing laparoscopy surgery between the intervention and the retention test 3-6 weeks after. 5. No informed consent. 6. Does not speak Danish on a conversational level.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time (minutes) to reach the predefined proficiency level for the basic skills and the salpingectomy procedure1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time (minutes) to reach the predefined proficiency level for the basic skills and salpingectomy procedure under 2D conditions after 3-6 weeks without laparoscopic training during the follow-up period1 year

Other

MeasureTime frame
Workload: NASA TLX questionnaire after the first and fifth attempt on procedural module,1 year
Visual and physical discomfort questionnaire after each training session (adverse effect: eye strain, headache, dizziness, nausea, tired and sore neck/back),1 year

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026