Skip to content

Retrograde Colonic Irrigation to Manage Spina Bifida Functional Digestive Sequelae: a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Retrograde Colonic Irrigation to Manage Spina Bifida Functional Digestive Sequelae: a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02361450
Acronym
IRRICO
Enrollment
34
Registered
2015-02-11
Start date
2015-03-16
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2023-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spina Bifida

Keywords

Faecal incontinence, Spina Bifida, Enema, Constipation, Myelomeningocele, Human

Brief summary

Spina Bifida is a developmental congenital disorder caused by the incomplete closing of the embryonic neural tube, leading to serious malformations of the nervous system. Caudal neuropore malformations almost always lead to sensory-motor deficits (including complete paraplegia) with orthopedic deformations, pressure sores, and pelvic/perineal neurological dysfunctions (affecting the bladder-sphincter, anorectal, and genital sphere). The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of retrograde colonic irrigation associated with usual care (medical treatments, patient education) on anorectal dysfunction (incontinence and/or constipation), compared to usual care only.

Detailed description

Sphincter dysfunctions impair the quality of life and patients' self-esteem. However, defecation disorders are important issues the Spina Bifida National Reference Center has to deal with. Indeed, more than half of patients are concerned. These disorders are mainly due to fecal stasis. Treatments include laxatives and hygiene recommendations. Colonic irrigation can also be useful, especially to achieve colonic vacuity and improve continence. The use of intra-rectal balloon inflation probes and the control of instillation flow improved retrograde colonic irrigation efficacy. Nevertheless, this technique is currently not evaluated in young adults suffering from Spina Bifida functional digestive sequelae, who are mainly concerned by Malone enema. The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of retrograde colonic irrigation associated with usual care (medical treatments, patient education) on anorectal dysfunction (incontinence and/or constipation), compared to usual care only.

Interventions

DEVICERetrograde Colonic Irrigation
OTHERUsual Care

Sponsors

Rennes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aging at least 15 years old with Spina Bifida neurological pelvi-perineal sequelae, objected by neurologic exam , functional urinary and/or anorectal and/or neurophysiological data, * Patients with NBD score above 9, * Written and informed consent (Minor children may be included with the consent of the two parents).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with psychiatric disorders, cognitive or intellectual disabilities compromising the assessment of primary outcome measure, * Patients using currently irrigation colonic technique, * Patients with functional colostomy, known anal or colorectal stenosis, colorectal cancer, acute or chronic inflammatory disease, recent anal or colorectal surgery for less than 3 months, polyp removal for less than 4 weeks, ischemic colitis. * Patients with urinary trophic or orthopedic disease with planned surgery during inclusion or follow-up periods, * Patients with progressive anal disease (suppuration, hemorrhoid or rectal prolapse) * Patient with a hard follow-up ( judged by the investigator) * Person involved in another clinical trial * Pregnant women * Person with a measure of legal protection (guardianship)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) scoreTen weeks after inclusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of lifeTen weeks after inclusionQuality of life will be assess by semi-quantified scales
Self esteem (Rosenberg scale)Ten weeks after inclusion
Functional digestive score (NBD)Twenty-four weeks after inclusion
Cumulative time spent using restroomsTen weeks after inclusionCumulative time spent using restrooms will be collected with a patient reported outcome questionnaire
Number of accidents of incontinenceTen weeks after inclusionNumber of accidents of incontinence will be collected with a patient reported outcome questionnaire
Questionnaire data of incontinence and constipation (Cleveland scores)Ten weeks after inclusion
Type of incontinence guards usedTen weeks after inclusionType of incontinence guards (panty liner, pad, nappy) used will be collected with a patient reported outcome questionnaire
Number of stoolsTen weeks after inclusionNumber of stools will be collected with a patient reported outcome questionnaire
Stools consistencyTen weeks after inclusionStools consistency will be collected with a patient reported outcome questionnaire
Symptoms experienced during defecationTen weeks after inclusionSymptoms experienced during defecation will be collected with a patient reported outcome questionnaire
Frequency of digital help during defecationTen weeks after inclusionThe frequency of digital stimulation will be collected with a patient reported outcome questionnaire
Number of incontinence guards usedTen weeks after inclusionNumber of incontinence guards used will be collected with a patient reported outcome questionnaire

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026