Stroke
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aimed to develop and implement an interdisciplinary team model with integration of all the relevant expertise and to establish powerful collaboration and communication among the team. To this extent, we designed a new approach toward self-care training called the seamless self-care training technique, which involves enhanced coordination and communication between OTs and nurses in the rehabilitation ward to promote interdisciplinary cooperation in self-care training.
Detailed description
Rehabilitation is mandatory to promote functional recovery and minimize the distress of stroke survivors as much as possible. Even though rehabilitation outcomes are expected in all aspects, in one study the highest improvements were observed for bowel and bladder functions, transfer, and mobility, while the lowest improvements were seen in bathing (washing oneself), grooming (caring of body parts), dressing, and stair climbing. Occupational therapists (OTs) are responsible for assessing and teaching skills to facilitate patients' activities and participation, including maximizing their performance of ADLs, and provide training programs and techniques that are tailor-made for each individual's impairment using targeted task-specific training, which has been acknowledged as the most effective method for enhancing functional outcomes. Nevertheless, the most important key factor for successful training outcomes is the collaboration of multiple healthcare professionals. All team members, especially nurses who spend lots of time with patients, should focus on encouraging and facilitating patients in transferring the newly relearned skills from professionals into their lives. Unfortunately, each expert usually approaches the patients from their own aspects, causing a lack of team perspective that could potentially preclude the patients from achieving their rehabilitation goals. In current inpatient rehabilitation practice, there is still a gap in carrying out self-care training. Self-care training is usually carried out by OTs at the occupational therapy unit, whereas nursing staff assists washing and dressing the patients during admission at the rehabilitation ward. Due to time constraints, nurses usually concentrate on preparing the patients to be ready on time for other specific training. This hinders them from allowing patients the time and opportunity to practice by themselves, resulting in patients' having low confidence and a perception of low self-efficacy. Consequently, some patients may not develop sufficient skills to perform self-care independently after discharge. This situation was reported by Pryor and Long that an integrative function of nurses and other professionals was sub-optimal. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to develop and implement an interdisciplinary team model with integration of all the relevant expertise and to establish powerful collaboration and communication among the team. To this extent, we designed a new approach toward self-care training called the seamless self-care training technique, which involves enhanced coordination and communication between OTs and nurses in the rehabilitation ward to promote interdisciplinary cooperation in self-care training. We hope that this technique could make therapeutic intervention more successful and fill the gap in treatment processes, as well as to increase the self-efficacies of stroke survivors. The objective of this study was to explore the outcomes of providing this seamless self-care training to stroke patients.
Interventions
PROCEDURESeamless ADL training
The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training
PROCEDUREConventional ADL training
The control group receive the conventional ADL training programme
Sponsors
Mahidol University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* First attack of stroke * Good sitting balance * TMSE 24 or more * Need help in dresssing and bathing
Exclusion criteria
* Bilateral hemiparesis * Dependent ADL before stroke attack * Dementia * Depression
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ability of Dressing and Bathing | 2 weeks | Normalized gain The raw score from the self-care checklist for dressing and washing oneself was used to calculate the normalized gain. Because stroke patients had varying scores for their initial dressing and washing oneself abilities, their possible window of improvement could be limited by the floor to ceiling effect. Therefore, it was considered that their improvements should be assessed by the normalized gain, which was introduced by Hake as a rough measure of the effectiveness of a training course and has since become the standard method for reporting scores. Hake defined normalized gain (g) as the ratio of the actual gain to the maximum possible gain as given in the equation: Normalized gain (g) = (post-training) - (pre-training) / (maximum score) - (pre-training) With a possible value between 0.0-1.0, the normalized gain can be divided into 3 levels: ''high-g'' for g ≥ 0.7, ''medium-g'' for 0.3 ≤ g ˂0.7, and ''low-g'' for g ˂ 0.3 The higher score means a better outcome. |
Countries
Thailand
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Conventional ADL Training The control group receive the conventional ADL training programme
Conventional ADL training: The control group receive the conventional ADL training programme | 18 |
| Seamless ADL Training The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training programme which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training.
Seamless ADL training: The experimental group receive the seamless ADL training which occupational therapist and nurse work with effective communication and cooperate in dressing and bathing training | 17 |
| Total | 35 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Unstable medical condition. | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Conventional ADL Training | Seamless ADL Training | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 57.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | 58.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | 18 Participants | 17 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Thailand | 18 Participants | 17 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Self-care score | 31.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 | 29.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 | 30.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 10 Participants | 21 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 18 | 0 / 17 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 18 | 0 / 17 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 18 | 0 / 17 |
Outcome results
Primary
Ability of Dressing and Bathing
Normalized gain The raw score from the self-care checklist for dressing and washing oneself was used to calculate the normalized gain. Because stroke patients had varying scores for their initial dressing and washing oneself abilities, their possible window of improvement could be limited by the floor to ceiling effect. Therefore, it was considered that their improvements should be assessed by the normalized gain, which was introduced by Hake as a rough measure of the effectiveness of a training course and has since become the standard method for reporting scores. Hake defined normalized gain (g) as the ratio of the actual gain to the maximum possible gain as given in the equation: Normalized gain (g) = (post-training) - (pre-training) / (maximum score) - (pre-training) With a possible value between 0.0-1.0, the normalized gain can be divided into 3 levels: ''high-g'' for g ≥ 0.7, ''medium-g'' for 0.3 ≤ g ˂0.7, and ''low-g'' for g ˂ 0.3 The higher score means a better outcome.
Time frame: 2 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional ADL Training | Ability of Dressing and Bathing | 0.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Seamless ADL Training | Ability of Dressing and Bathing | 0.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
p-value: 0.05ANCOVA