Skip to content

Neurofeedback and Computerized Cognitive Training in Different Settings for Children and Adolescents With ADHD

Neurofeedback and Computerized Cognitive Training in Different Settings for Children and Adolescents With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02358941
Enrollment
102
Registered
2015-02-09
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2017-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Keywords

ADHD, neurofeedback, computerized cognitive training, school

Brief summary

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is among the most common childhood-onset psychiatric disorders, with a negative and long-lasting impact on academic achievement, social integration and quality of life. In recent years, the efficacy of non-pharmacological treatments for ADHD, such as neurofeedback training (NF) and computerized cognitive training (CCT), has been at the centre of research. Although an increasing number of well-designed studies have shown that both methods may improve ADHD core symptoms according to parents' ratings, the underlying mechanisms are still a matter of debate. Teachers often report smaller improvements, if any. This has been explained by their lesser involvement in the training. It remains questionable, however, whether other factors may also account for this effect and whether methods other than placebo control may be applied in order to demonstrate the specificity and efficacy of NF and CCT. The main purpose of this project is to demonstrate and compare the efficacy of two different computer-based treatment methods for children and adolescents with ADHD, namely NF and CCT, and to examine the impact of different treatment settings, with half of the participants being trained in a clinical setting and the other half at school. The investigators want to show that is feasible to implement NF and CCT in a school setting and that both methods, conducted either at school or in a clinical setting, may lead to significant improvements of ADHD symptoms as well as to specific and differential effects. Besides the differential impact of the settings on informant ratings, the investigators will evaluate the effects of the training methods on neuropsychological and electrophysiological outcome. Classroom behavior of the children before and after the training will be evaluated by trained observers not informed on treatment assignments and settings.

Interventions

In neurofeedback training, EEG-activity is visualized and fed back to the participant online on a computer screen. Successful regulation is rewarded by bonus points. The aim is to gain control over one's brain activity and to be able to switch to or to maintain a more wakeful, alert or focussed state.

BEHAVIORALComputerized cognitive training

In computerized cognitive training, impaired neuropsychological functions, such as inhibition, working memory, distractibility, are directly trained by adaptive computerized software programs. We use training programs from a scientifically based training system for patients presenting problems with sustained, focussed or selective attention, working memory, inhibition, processing speed. Good performance / improvements are rewarded with bonus points.

Sponsors

Swiss National Science Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ADHD (DSM IV)

Exclusion criteria

* Estimated IQ \< 80 * Known neurological impairment / brain injury * Severe comorbid conditions (e.g. CD, ODD, autism)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ADHD behavioral symptomsOutcome assessment 6 months after baselinePrimary outcome measures will be assessed by clinical scales (Conners 3), rated by parents and teachers.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuropsychological performance, EEG parametersOutcome assessment 6 months after baselineComputerized test battery for attention and working memory; Q-EEG, event related potentials

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Classroom behaviorObservation 1 approx. 2 weeks before the start of the training, observation 2 (endpoint) approx. 2 weeks after the end of the trainingStandardized classroom observations of the participating children are conducted by a trained observer blind to whether the participant has already been trained or not and to which of the two training methods he has been allocated to. With regard to this measure, it is a single blind study with blinding of the assessor.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026