Skip to content

Canadian Community Utilization of Stroke Prevention Study - Emergency Department

Canadian Community Utilization of Stroke Prevention Study - Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02358655
Acronym
C-CUSP ED
Enrollment
360
Registered
2015-02-09
Start date
2015-06-01
Completion date
2018-03-08
Last updated
2018-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke

Keywords

Oral anticoagulant, Knowledge translation, Emergency department

Brief summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart condition, and increases the risk of stroke by six times. There are several medications (blood thinners) that can prevent strokes in AF patients. Many AF patients present to the emergency department, but about half of AF patients leave without prescription of a blood thinner. The study aims to evaluate if adding options like giving a patient education kit, encouraging emergency room physicians to prescribe a blood thinner and providing a specialized AF clinic to patients will increase the number patients receiving blood thinners to prevent strokes.

Detailed description

This is a knowledge translation study will occur in three consecutive phases: Phase 1 is a retrospective chart review of all patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with ECG documented AF during 1 year prior to study commencement. The main purpose of Phase 1 is to determine if oral anticoagulants (OACs) were prescribed for eligible AF patients at ED discharge. In Phase 2 a low-intensity intervention will be applied in the ED during 6 months, involving physician education, distribution of an AF patient education package, short-term OAC prescription, and a follow-up letter to the patient's family physician. After a one month transition phase, a high intensity intervention will be applied during 6 months in Phase 3. Phase 3 incorporates the Phase 2 intervention, and adds immediate follow-up (within 48-72 hours) in a community AF clinic run by a nurse/pharmacist who is supervised by a specialist in AF.

Interventions

OTHERRetrospective review of OAC prescription
OTHERPrescription of OAC in ED
OTHERCommunity AF clinic

Sponsors

Population Health Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who present to the emergency department with electrocardiographically documented atrial fibrillation on a 12 lead ECG

Exclusion criteria

* Prosthetic or mechanical mitral or aortic valve * Known rheumatic heart disease * Unable to provide informed consent * Will be admitted to hospital * Life expectancy of \< 6 months * Metastatic malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
New OAC Prescription (Phase 1 and 3 comparison)Up to 72 hrs

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
New OAC Prescription (Phase 1 and 2 comparison)Up to 72 hrs
New OAC Prescription (Phase 2 and 3 comparison)Up to 72 hrs
OAC use in eligible patients at 6 months (Phase 2 and 3 comparison)6 months
Uptake of study interventions6 monthsThis outcome measure is meant to determine feasibility for a larger community cluster RCT. This will be measured by the uptake of the interventions described in this study, including: patient use of the AF educational kit, patient use of AF clinic, attendance at educational presentations for patients, family doctors and emergency physicians, patient use of automated text or email reminders for OACs.
OAC use in eligible patients at 30 days (Phase 2 and 3 comparison)30 days

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety related to OAC, as measured by rates of adverse events related to OAC including major bleeding and minor bleeding6 monthsRates of adverse events related to OAC including major bleeding and minor bleeding will be assessed

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026