Skip to content

Comparison of Axillary Vein Puncture With Subclavian Vein Puncture in Pacemaker Implantation

Comparison of Axillary Vein Puncture With Subclavian Vein Puncture in Pacemaker Implantation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02358551
Enrollment
220
Registered
2015-02-09
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2015-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Complication of Cardiac Pacemaker

Keywords

Pacemaker, Axillary Vein, Subclavian vein, Clinical Study, Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices

Brief summary

The intrathoracic subclavian venous technique for pacemaker implantation may be associated with serious complications. Axillary vein puncture tends to reduce lead implantation complications such as pneumothorax and lead crush, but clinical adoption is not widely acknowledged, especially in China, although this approach has been proposed for 20 years. The major concern is the learning curve for axillary vein puncture and its success rate. The investigators try to prove that the success rate of axillary vein puncture is non-inferior to subclavian vein puncture, hence to promote the clinical application of axillary vein puncture to reduce pacemaker implantation complications.

Interventions

DEVICEPlacement of electrode lead through axillary vein puncture
DEVICEPlacement of electrode lead through subclavian vein puncture

Sponsors

China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with indication of pacemaker or ICD implantation * Personally signed and dated informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* Accompanied with malignant disease or other disease, which cause life expectancy \< 1 year. * Anatomical variation of axillary vein or subclavian vein, unable to puncture. * Poor compliance for follow-up. * Patients with any condition which, in the investigator's judgment, not suitable for enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of vein puncture1 Day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mechanical complication of electrode lead (combined endpoints of hemothorax, pneumothorax, air embolism, inadvertent arterial puncture, hematoma, fracture of electrode lead, nerve injury and subclavian crush syndrome)6 months
Duration of pacemaker implantation1 Day

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXianlun Li, MD
leexianlun@163.com86-10-84206151
Backup ContactPeng Liu, MD, PhD
liupengdoc@gmail.com86-10-84205136

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026