Lumbar Disc Herniation
Conditions
Brief summary
In our study, a multicenter randomized controlled，single blind trial will be performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these three procedures for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.
Detailed description
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common diseases in the department of orthopedics, which produced medical and economic burdens to families and society. In spite, the majority of the patients with disc herniation can be relieved or even cured via conservative treatment; there are still a considerable number of invalid patients who eventually still need to be undergoing a surgical operation treatment. Three main methods for intervertebral disc surgery are adopted in our routine work. One procedure is Open Discectomy (OD), which has been always a gold standard for treatment of LDH. And the other two procedures are Microendoscopic Discectomy (MED) and Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (TELD) respectively. MED and TELD have been developed as alternatives to OD. OD can compress the nerve root or spinal cord through removal of the protrusion. However, it destroys the rear structure of spine, causing segmental instability and long-term distress. Compared with OD, MED and TELD procedures are smaller incisions or less dissection (or both), lower blood loss, less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalisation and earlier return to work. However, the steep learning curves of MID inhibit the development of surgery specialists; for example, optimal surgical management requires many years of experience. These deficiencies need more educational effort at a higher priority than accorded so far. There are inconsistent outcomes about the efficacy and safety in the previous studies; all of the recent researches do not yield conclusive results.
Interventions
PROCEDUREopen discectomy
The open discectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
PROCEDUREmicroendoscopic discectomy
Microendoscopic discectomy combines standard lumbar microsurgical techniques with endoscope, enabling surgeons to successfully address free-fragment disc pathologic factors and lateral recess stenosis.
transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy removes the intervertebral disc portion through the intervertebral foramen
Sponsors
Southeast University, China
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. All forms of disc herniation were included in the study 2. History of concordant radicular leg pain refractory to conservative treatment for longer than 6 months 3. Leg pain must be greater than back pain
Exclusion criteria
1. cauda equine syndrome, 2. progressive neurologic deficit, 3. bilateral lower extremity symptoms, 4. low back pain more than leg pain 5. Systemic infection or localized infection at the anticipated entry needle site 6. combined with lumbar infection, fracture of lumbar vertebra, tumor, Ⅱ°and above spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar scoliosis is larger than 15 degree 7. with severe heart, brain, lungs, and other organs disease or mental illness 8. History of opioid abuse or patients currently on long acting opioid 9. History of the operation on lumbar 10. Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) | up to 104 weeks | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -\> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| visual analogue scale(VAS) | up to 104 weeks | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome |
| The generic health survey on the Short Form-36(SF-36) | up to 104 weeks | The scale was used to evaluate the quality of life |
| Complications survey | up to 104 weeks | Complications of surgery including mortality and common: thrombosis; surgical site and other infections; recurrent disc herniation; dural tear; nerve root injury |
Contacts
Primary ContactWang Kun, PHD
Backup ContactWu Xiaotao, MD
Outcome results
None listed