Skip to content

Decentralized Dietary UC Pilot Trial

A Pilot Study Investigating a Decentralized Approach to Studying Dietary Intervention in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02357537
Enrollment
51
Registered
2015-02-06
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colitis, Ulcerative

Keywords

Telemedicine

Brief summary

This study is designed to assess differences in remote and on-site patient study participation in the State of Massachusetts, as well as the significance of dietary interventions and their impact on UC. The study will activate one site with a Principal Investigator who will utilize each subject's local care system (local Gastroenterologist) to collect study data, along with telemonitoring and video visits, to make key study assessments and decisions regarding subjects' progression in the study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCombined Anti-inflammatory Diet (CAID)

The CAID requires participants to modify their diet to include certain types of foods that may have anti-inflammatory properties. Participants on the CAID will be required to abstain from red meat and alcoholic beverages.

Sponsors

Transparency Life Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females between the ages of 18 and 80, inclusive, who reside in the state of Massachusetts. 2. Ability and willingness to provide documented informed consent and to comply with the study procedures, including in-person visits for Arm 1 and video visits for Arm 2. 3. Documented history of moderate to severe active UC 4. Disease duration of ≥12 weeks at the time of screening (diagnosed according to American College of Gastroenterology practice guidelines) 5. Screening fecal calprotectin\>350 mg/g 6. Diagnosis of moderately to severely active UC, including historical endoscopy sub score ≥2; a rectal bleeding sub score ≥1 and disease activity a minimum of 25 cm from the anal verge. 7. Documented (via video or report) endoscopy performed within 2 years prior to randomization. 8. Access to a computer or mobile device with internet connection and an active email address.

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior extensive colonic resection, subtotal or total colectomy or planned surgery for UC 2. Past or present ileostomy or colostomy 3. Short bowel syndrome 4. Diagnosis of indeterminate colitis, fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon 5. Past or present fistula or abdominal abscess 6. History or current evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia 7. Use of tube feeding, defined formula diets or parenteral alimentation/nutrition which has not been discontinued ≥3 weeks prior to study enrollment 8. Use of anticoagulants, herbal supplements and omega-3/fish oil supplements during the study 9. Crohn's Disease 10. Significant uncontrolled co-morbidity, such as neurological, cardiac (e.g., moderate to severe heart failure NYHA class III/IV), pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine or gastrointestinal disorders 11. History of alcohol, drug or chemical abuse within 6 months prior to screening 12. Pregnant females, those intending to become pregnant, and those who are lactating 13. Current participation in any other clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Endoscopy Mayo Score Comparison (proportion of endoscopies to which an independent reader can successfully assign an endoscopic Mayo Clinic sub-score)Week 1Comparison of the proportion of endoscopies to which an independent reader can successfully assign an endoscopic Mayo Clinic sub-score between Study Arms 1 and 2.
Compliance (proportion of missing or non-evaluable records per patient and the proportion of patients who did not complete the study)Week 7Comparison of the proportion of missing or non-evaluable records per patient and the proportion of patients who did not complete the study between Study Arms 1 and 2.
Combined Anti-inflammatory Diet (Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin/microbiome levels)Weeks 0, 5 and 7Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin/microbiome levels between Control (standard nutritional advice) and CAID (dietary intervention) arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Satisfaction SurveyWeek 7Difference in reported patient satisfaction with trial participation between arms 1 and 2.
Mayo Score and Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index Difference (Difference in partial Mayo Clinic sub-Score and Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index)Weeks 1 and 7Difference in partial Mayo Clinic sub-Score and Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index between Control and CAID (dietary intervention).
Physician's Global Assessment Discrepancy FrequencyWeek 7Frequency of discrepancy between Principal Investigator-assessed and gastroenterologist-assessed Mayo Clinic Physician's Global Assessment Sub-Score for Arm 2 patients at baseline.
Mayo Score Discrepancy FrequencyWeek 7Frequency of discrepancy between Principal Investigator-assessed and gastroenterologist-assessed Mayo Clinic Endoscopy Sub-Scores for Arm 2 patients at baseline.
Adverse EventsWeekly through week 11Difference in incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) between Study Arms 1 and 2 and between Control and CAID (dietary intervention) arms.
Dietary Compliance ComparisonWeek 7Comparison of patient non-compliance events with dietary regimen between arms 1 and 2.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJustine States
dietaryUCTrial@partners.org(617) 732-9110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026