Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Conditions
Keywords
ADSC, osteoarthritis, knee, adipose
Brief summary
This safety and feasibility study used autologous adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSC), the stromal vascular fraction (SVF), to treat 8 osteoarthritic (OA) knees in 6 patients of grade I to III (K-L scale) with initial pain of 4 or greater on a 10 point scale, under Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved protocol.
Detailed description
This safety and feasibility study used autologous adipose-derived stromal cells, the stromal vascular fraction, to treat 8 osteoarthritic knees in 6 patients of grade I to III (K-L scale) with initial pain of 4 or greater on a 10 point scale, under IRB-approved protocol. Evaluation of the safety of intra-articular injection of the stromal vascular fraction cells was the primary objective of the study. Adipose-derived stromal vascular cells were obtained through enzymatic disaggregation of lipoaspirate, resuspended in 3 ml of Lactated Ringer's Solution, and injected directly into the intra-articular space with a mean of 12 million viable nucleated SVF cells per knee.
Interventions
Single injection of ADSC
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* voluntarily provided written Informed Consent * ages 20-70 * male or female * grades I-III radiologically documented OA of one or both knees * American Society Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I-II and a • BMI less than 35 * knee pain graded as greater than 3 out of 10 on screening questionnaire * able to speak, read and understand English -
Exclusion criteria
* patient parameters falling outside of the inclusion criteria * current oral or parenteral steroid or blood thinner use * hyaluronic acid-based injection to the affected knee joint within the previous six months * corticosteroid injection to the affected knee joint within the previous three months * end stage (Grade IV) OA
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Safety as Measured by Adverse Events | Entire Study (1 year) | Adverse Events were recorded during the entirety of the study. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) | Baseline to 1 year | Comparison of WOMAC score (pain, stiffness and functionality measures) measured at baseline (pre-treatment), 3 months and 1 year (post treatment). WOMAC score: 0 (best) to 100 (worst) |
| Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | Baseline to 1 year | Comparison of VAS pain score as measured before treatment and 3 months and 1 year after treatment. VAS measured on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). |
| Comparison of Baseline and 3 Months Measures of Knee Flexion for Range of Motion | Baseline to 3 months | Comparison of baseline measure of knee flexion to 3 months measurements of knee flexion. An increase in range of motion is positive (improved ability to move) and a decrease in range of motion is negative. |
| Comparison of Baseline Score and 3 Months Score in Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG). | baseline to 3 months | Comparison of baseline time for subjects' ability to rapidly rise from a chair, move rapidly 2 meters from the chair, turn and return and sit in the chair to the same measure at 3 months. Time to complete task is measured in seconds. |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Treatment Arm Single injection of ADSC | 6 |
| Total | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Treatment Arm |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 1 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 6 |
Outcome results
Safety as Measured by Adverse Events
Adverse Events were recorded during the entirety of the study.
Time frame: Entire Study (1 year)
Population: All 6 participants were included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Safety as Measured by Adverse Events | 0 percentage of participants |
Comparison of Baseline and 3 Months Measures of Knee Flexion for Range of Motion
Comparison of baseline measure of knee flexion to 3 months measurements of knee flexion. An increase in range of motion is positive (improved ability to move) and a decrease in range of motion is negative.
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline and 3 Months Measures of Knee Flexion for Range of Motion | Pre-treatment | 136.6 degrees | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline and 3 Months Measures of Knee Flexion for Range of Motion | Post-treatment | 143.6 degrees | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain
Comparison of VAS pain score as measured before treatment and 3 months and 1 year after treatment. VAS measured on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Time frame: Baseline to 1 year
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | Pre-treatment | 5.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | 3 months Post-treatment | 1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | 1 year Post-treatment | 2.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Comparison of WOMAC score (pain, stiffness and functionality measures) measured at baseline (pre-treatment), 3 months and 1 year (post treatment). WOMAC score: 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Time frame: Baseline to 1 year
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) | Pre-treatment | 32.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) | 3 months Post-treatment | 10.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline Score and 1 Year Score in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) | 1 year Post-treatment | 9.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
Comparison of Baseline Score and 3 Months Score in Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG).
Comparison of baseline time for subjects' ability to rapidly rise from a chair, move rapidly 2 meters from the chair, turn and return and sit in the chair to the same measure at 3 months. Time to complete task is measured in seconds.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline Score and 3 Months Score in Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG). | Post-treatment | 2.8 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Treatment Arm | Comparison of Baseline Score and 3 Months Score in Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG). | Pre-treatment | 5.4 seconds | Standard Deviation 1.6 |