Left Internal Thoracic Artery Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Diabetics

Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus

Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether less invasive bypass surgery using the left chest wall artery is more or less effective than inserting a heart stent in patients with diabetes and a blockage of the main artery at the front of the heart. This will be a clinical trial study where the investigators will test the rate of recruitment into the study, as well as the feasibility of allocating each of the 2 treatments.

Purpose/Objectives: The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate whether minimally invasive bypass surgery with the left internal thoracic artery (MICS CABG) is more or less effective than percutaneous revascularization with drug eluting stents (PCI/DES) in patients with diabetes and stenosis of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. Population: The investigators will recruit 100 adults with diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) and angiographically-confirmed proximal or mid LAD disease, morphologically amenable to either MICS CABG or PCI/DES; outside the context of an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and with indication for revascularization based upon symptoms of worsening angina and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia. Design: This trial is a multicentre, two-arm, open label, prospective, randomized, pilot trial over a duration of 2.75 years, with 0.75 year of initiation, 1 year of patient recruitment and 2 years of follow-up. Patients who consent will be randomized on a 1:1 basis either to MICS CABG or PCI/DES of the LAD, and followed at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 years. Treatment: Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either MICS CABG or PCI/DES to the LAD. Patients randomized to the PCI/DES arm will receive, at the discretion of the primary physician or interventionalist, the stent of choice at the treating institution, with a recommendation of a everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stent. Primary Endpoint: The primary endpoint is successfully enrolled, eligible and consenting patients within the first year of enrollment, with success defined as 100 patients or more. Secondary Endpoints: All-cause mortality, Myocardial Infarction (MI), stroke and target vessel revascularization (TVR) will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES versus MICS CABG. For these analyses, the survival analysis outlined for the primary analysis will be followed. Quality of Life (QOL) at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 year will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES vs. MICS CABG. Patients will be asked to complete the following questionnaires: the EuroQOL (EQ-5D) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Statistics: The main feasibility questions are: can the investigators enroll a sizable number of patients at a given centre over a 1 year period?, can the investigators implement and conduct the proposed trial across multiple centres?, and can the investigators ensure high protocol adherence and follow-up, as well as minimize crossovers?. By enrolling 100 participants across 5 sites over 1 year, and follow them. For each therapy group, the frequency distribution each of the domains of the EQ5D will be tabulated and the mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range (IQR) calculated. Therapy groups will be compared on these outcomes using the t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and 95%CI calculated. Repeated measures ANOVA will compare the two therapy groups on changes in health related QOL over time Participating Centres: The investigators have chosen 5 study sites in Canada (3) and in the United States (2). The recruitment goal for each site is to enroll at least 20 patients.

No related papers found yet.