Skip to content

Pasireotide in Patients With Acromegaly Inadequately Controlled With First Generation Somatostatin Analogues

A Phase IIIb Multicenter, Open-label, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide in Patients With Acromegaly Inadequately Controlled With First Generation Somatostatin Analogues

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02354508
Enrollment
123
Registered
2015-02-03
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2018-09-27
Last updated
2019-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acromegaly

Keywords

acromegaly, GH, IGF-1, pasireotide LAR, SOM230, first generation, somatostatin analogues, growth disorder, gigantism, Pituitary adenoma, pituitary gigantism

Brief summary

This is a phase IIIb multicenter, open-label; single arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pasireotide LAR 40 mg and 60 mg in patients with inadequately controlled acromegaly with maximal approved doses of first generation somatostatin analogues. The study will enroll inadequately controlled patients by high doses (maximal approved) of first-generation somatostatin analogues given for at least 3 months. Patients will receive pasireotide LAR 40 mg or 60 mg during the 36 week core study phase. Patients who have completed all visits of core phase and have completed all the assessments at the core phase completion visit can move into the 32-week extension phase. Patients can continue with study treatment until pasireotide LAR is commercially available and reimbursed in their respective country or until the end of the extension phase whichever occurs first.

Detailed description

This is a phase IIIb multicenter, open-label; single arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pasireotide LAR 40 mg and 60 mg in patients with inadequately controlled acromegaly with maximal doses of first generation somatostatin analogues. The study will enroll inadequately controlled patients by high doses of first-generation somatostatin analogues given for at least 3 months. Patients will be categorized into two groups. Group 1 consists of patients treated with octreotide LAR 30 mg from countries where octreotide LAR 40mg is approved for the treatment of acromegaly at the time of screening. These patients will start a 3-months run-in phase to receive 40mg octreotide before being considered eligible to enter the core treatment phase. After 3 months of treatment have been completed, and prior to the fourth injection a mean GH and IGF-1 will be assessed. Patients who are achieving biochemical control will be considered a screen failure and they will not qualify for the core phase of the study. They will continue treatment with octreotide LAR 40 mg outside the frame of this study. Group 2 consists of patients treated with octreotide LAR 30 mg from countries where octreotide 40mg is NOT yet approved at the time of screening. This group also includes patients already treated with octreotide LAR 40 mg or lanreotide ATG 120 mg. Patients should have been treated with the first generation SSAs for at least 3 months prior to screening. Eligible patients can directly enter the core treatment phase of the study. A run-in phase is not required for this patient population. In the core treatment phase patients will start treatment with pasireotide LAR 40 mg every 4 weeks. At week 12, the mean GH value and IGF-1value will be assessed. Patients who have not achieved biochemical control by week 12 and do not have any tolerability issues with pasireotide LAR 40 mg will have the dose increased to 60 mg. Patients who have achieved biochemical control by week 12 will maintain a dose of pasireotide LAR 40 mg. A mean GH value and IGF-1 value will be assessed every 12 weeks until Visit 777. At weeks 16 and 28, the investigator will be able to adjust the dose based on the achievement of biochemical control and drug tolerability. If tolerability issues occur, the dose can be decreased in 20 mg. Once the tolerability issue resolves, the patients should return to the dose previously received. Patients will be treated for a total of 36 weeks during the core phase. During this period any concomitant medication for the treatment of acromegaly is prohibited. Patients are required to complete a core phase completion visit 4 weeks after the last dose of pasireotide LAR is administered. Patients who discontinue from the core phase are also required to complete the core phase completion visit 4 weeks after receiving the last pasireotide LAR dose. Patients who have completed all visits of core phase and have completed all the assessments at the core phase completion visit (Visit 777) can move into the extension phase. The core phase completion visit performed at Visit 777, will also be the first visit (Visit 18) of the extension phase. At Visit 18, the patients will receive the same dose of pasireotide LAR that they received at week 32 (Visit 17). At week 40 (Visit 19), the investigator will decide the treatment regimen and the pasireotide LAR dose based on the achievement of biochemical control at Visit 777. Patients achieving biochemical control at the end of the core phase will continue pasireotide LAR monotherapy at the same dose of the core phase. Patients who are uncontrolled at the end of the core phase will continue pasireotide LAR 60 mg and they will be allowed to receive concomitant treatment with medications used to treat acromegaly based on the investigator's clinical judgment. GH and IGF-1 levels will be assessed every 12 weeks until week 72. At weeks 52 and 64, the investigator will be able to adjust the dose of pasireotide LAR and the regimen of the concomitant medication used to acromegaly based on the patients achievement of biochemical control and drug tolerability. Patients will be treated for a total of 32 weeks in the extension phase and receive the last dose of study treatment at week 68 (Visit 26). Patients are required to complete an extension phase completion visit (Visit 778) 4 weeks after the last dose of pasireotide LAR is administered. Patients who prematurely discontinue from the extension phase are also required to complete the extension phase completion visit (Visit 778) 4 weeks after receiving the last dose of pasireotide LAR. After discontinuation from the study or completion of study treatment either at the core phase or extension phase of the study, all patients will be followed for safety for 12 weeks (84 days) after the last study drug administration. This visit can be performed by phone, a study visit for follow-up is not mandatory.

Interventions

Pasireotide 40 mg and 60 mg. Pasireotide 20 mg which was allowed for dose decrease in case of adverse event.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Male and female patients ≥18 years * Patients with confirmed diagnosis of inadequately controlled acromegaly (mean GH concentration ≥1 μg/L and sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1 \>1.3 x ULN) * Patients treated with octreotide LAR (30 mg or 40 mg) or lanreotide ATG (120 mg) monotherapy for at least 3 months prior to screening

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant treatment with other medications reducing GH and or IGF-1, unless discontinued 3 months prior to screening * Patients with compression of the optic chiasm requiring surgical intervention * Diabetic patients with HbA1c \>8% at screening * Patients who are hypothyroid and not on adequate replacement therapy * Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and acute or chronic pancreatitis * Patients with clinically significant valvular disease * Patients with risk factors for torsade de pointes (TdP) * Hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, uncontrolled hypothyroidism, family history of long QT syndrome or concomitant medications with known risk of TdP * Patients with congestive heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV), unstable angina, sustained ventricular tachycardia, clinically significant bradycardia, advanced heart block, history of acute MI less than one year prior to study entry or clinically significant impairment in cardiovascular function. * Concomitant disease(s) that could prolong the QT interval such as autonomic neuropathy (caused by diabetes or Parkinson's disease), HIV, cirrhosis, uncontrolled hypothyroidism or cardiac failure * Patients with liver disease or ALT/AST \> 2.0 X ULN, serum bilirubin \>2.0 X ULN - Presence of Hepatitis B surface antigen or Hepatitis C antibody test * Patients with serum creatinine \>2.0 X ULN * Patients with WBC \<3 X 109/L; Hb 90% \< LLN; PLT \<100 X 109/L * Patients with active or suspected acute or chronic uncontrolled infection * Patients who have undergone major surgery/surgical therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening * Patients with active malignant disease within the last five years (with the exception of basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix) * Patients with abnormal coagulation (PT and/or APTT elevated by 30% above normal limits) or patients receiving anticoagulants that affect PT (prothrombin time) or APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) * History of syncope or family history of idiopathic sudden death * History of immunocompromise, including a positive HIV test result (ELISA and Western blot) * Known hypersensitivity to somatostatin analogues or any other component of pasireotide LAR * Patients who have a history of alcohol or drug abuse in the 6 month period prior to receiving pasireotide * Patients who have given a blood donation (of 400 ml or more) within 2 months before receiving pasireotide * Patients who have participated in any clinical investigation with an investigational drug within 1 month prior to dosing * Patients with any current or prior medical condition interfering with the conduct of the study or the evaluation of the study results * Patients with a history of non-compliance to medical regimens or who are considered potentially unreliable or will be unable to complete the entire study. * Sexually active males unless they use a condom during intercourse while taking drug and for 3 months following last dose of pasireotide * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test * Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing and 3 months following the last dose of pasireotide.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and OverallWeek 36Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36.
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 for Participants Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mgWeek 36Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36, for participants who had been up-titrated with pasireotide LAR 60 mg.
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36Wek 36Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36.
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 36Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36, overall by baseline diabetic status.
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall - LOCFWeek 36Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36, by previous treatment and overall - last observation carried forward (LOCF)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 & 36Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using AcroQoL, an acromegaly-specific quality of life instrument. The AcroQol instrument is comprised of 22 questions divided into two scales: one evaluating physical aspects (8 items) and the other that addresses psychological aspects (14 items). The psychological scale can also be further divided into subscale that evaluates physical appearance and the other subscale focused on the impact of the disease on personal relationships of the patient (7 items each). Each of the questions has a 5-item Likert scale. For each dimension the scores range from 0-4 with 0 being the lowest impact and 4 being the most severe.
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeeks 12, 24 & 36Symptoms of acromegaly were collected at various visits. The measurement was to be provided on a scale of 1-15 including half sizes. Investigators asked the participants to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesias, osteoarthralgia according to a five-point score scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineWeeks 12, 24 & 36Symptoms of acromegaly were collected at various visits. The measurement was to be provided on a scale of 1-15 including half sizes. Investigators asked the participants to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesias, osteoarthralgia according to a five-point score scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index ScoresBaseline, Weeks 12, 24 & 36Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on health status, measured by EQ-5D-5L, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring general health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS AssessmentBaseline, Weeks 12, 24 & 36Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on health status, measured by EQ-5D-5L, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring general health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.
Extension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 & 72 (Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg)Weeks 48, 60 & 72Percentage of patients achieving IGF-1 \<ULN at weeks 48, 60 & 72 for participants with up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg mg
Core Phase: Change in Mean Growth Hormone (GH) Values From Baseline to Week 36Baseline, week 36Core phase - Changes in mean GH from study baseline to week 36.
Extension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeeks 48, 60, 72Percentage of patients achieving GH \<1 μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 48 by treatment with pasireotide LAR alone or with concomitant medications used to treat acromegaly
Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Baseline, Weeks 48, 60 & 72Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using AcroQoL, an acromegaly-specific quality of life instrument. The AcroQol instrument is comprised of 22 questions divided into two scales: one evaluating physical aspects (8 items) and the other that addresses psychological aspects (14 items). The psychological scale can also be further divided into subscale that evaluates physical appearance and the other subscale focused on the impact of the disease on personal relationships of the patient (7 items each). Each of the questions has a 5-item Likert scale. For each dimension the scores range from 0-4 with 0 being the lowest impact and 4 being the most severe.
Extension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeeks 48, 60 & 72Symptoms of acromegaly were collected at various visits. The measurement was to be provided on a scale of 1-15 including half sizes. Investigators asked the participants to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesias, osteoarthralgia according to a five-point score scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).
Extension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineWeeks 48, 60 & 72Symptoms of acromegaly were collected at various visits. The measurement was to be provided on a scale of 1-15 including half sizes. Investigators asked the participants to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesias, osteoarthralgia according to a five-point score scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).
Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index ScoresBaseline, Weeks 48, 60 & 72Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on health status, measured by EQ-5D-5L, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring general health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.
Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS AssessmentBaseline, Weeks 48, 60 & 72Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on health status, measured by EQ-5D-5L, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring general health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.
Extension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Weeks 48, 60, 72Percentage of participants achieving IGF-1 \<ULN at week 46, 60 and 72 overall by baseline diabetic status
Core Phase: Change in Standardized IGF-1 Values From Baseline to Week 36Baseline, week 36Core phase - Changes in standardized IGF-1 from study baseline to week 36.
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 12, Week 24, Week 36Percentage of participants achieving GH \<1 μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at weeks 12 and 24 overall and by GH level at screening.
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeeks 12, 24 & 36Percentage of participants achieving IGF-1 \<ULN at weeks 12, 24 & 36.
Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeeks 12, 24 & 36Core phase - Percentage of patients achieving GH \<1μg/L at week 12, 24, 36 overall and by GH level at screening.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, France, Hungary, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, Portugal, Romania, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Planned 112 participants and analyzed 123 participants. For Participant Flow/Baseline Characteristics Tables, Total = Participants in the Pasireotide LAR arm.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were allocated to Group 1 or Group 2 based on previously received first generation Somatostatin analog (SSA).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lanreotide 120 mg
Participants were treated with lanreotide 120mg and assigned to Group 2 (before starting on Pasireotide in the Core phase).
41
Octreotide 30 mg
Participants were treated with octreotide 30 mg and assigned to Group 2 (before starting on Pasireotide in the Core phase). .
29
Octreotide 40 mg
Participants were treated with octreotide 40 mg and assigned to either Group 1 (if 40mg octreotide was approved in the country) or Group 2 if 40mg octreotide was not approved in the country (before starting on Pasireotide in the Core phase).
53
Total123

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Period 1: Core PhaseAdverse Event112
Period 1: Core PhaseUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect102
Period 1: Core PhaseWithdrawal by Subject012
Period 2: Extension PhasePhysician Decision501
Period 2: Extension PhaseUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect132
Period 2: Extension PhaseWithdrawal by Subject010
Period 3: Post-treatment Follow up PhasePhysician Decision301
Period 3: Post-treatment Follow up PhaseUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect122
Period 3: Post-treatment Follow up PhaseWithdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLanreotide 120 mgOctreotide 30 mgOctreotide 40 mgTotal
Age, Continuous41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.02
41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.63
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants7 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
34 Participants14 Participants30 Participants78 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 Participants7 Participants19 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants18 Participants25 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants11 Participants28 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 920 / 123
other
Total, other adverse events
83 / 92112 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 9212 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36

Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36.

Time frame: Wek 36

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS): consisted of a subset of the patients in the FAS who were compliant with requirements of the clinical study protocol. The protocol deviations criteria were defined prior to database lock. Per-protocol analysis was performed during the core phase, but not during the extension phase.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 3615.7 Percentage of participants
Primary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36

Percentage of patients who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36, by previous treatment, type of therapy and overall.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 367.7 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 3613.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 3620.5 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 3617.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 360.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 3614.8 Percentage of participants
Primary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall

Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall14.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall13.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall15.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall14.6 Percentage of participants
Primary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall - LOCF

Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36, by previous treatment and overall - last observation carried forward (LOCF)

Time frame: Week 36

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall - LOCF14.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall - LOCF13.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall - LOCF17.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 by Previous Treatment and Overall - LOCF15.4 Percentage of participants
Primary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 for Participants Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg

Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36, for participants who had been up-titrated with pasireotide LAR 60 mg.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study. For these patients the Pasireotide LAR dose was uptitrated to 60 mg any time during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 for Participants Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg5.9 Percentage of participants
Primary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 for Participants Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg

Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36, for participants who had been up-titrated with pasireotide LAR 60 mg.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study. For these patients the Pasireotide LAR dose was uptitrated to 60 mg before Week 36.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 for Participants Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg6.7 Percentage of participants
Primary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status

Percentage of participants who achieved biochemical control defined as GH \<1μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 36, overall by baseline diabetic status.

Time frame: Week 36

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusDiabetic14.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusPre-diabetic19.4 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 g/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Week 36 Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusNon-diabetic0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index Scores

Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on health status, measured by EQ-5D-5L, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring general health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 & 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index ScoresWeek 120.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index ScoresWeek 240.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index ScoresWeek 360.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Secondary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Assessment

Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on health status, measured by EQ-5D-5L, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring general health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 & 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS AssessmentWeek 124.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.91
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS AssessmentWeek 243.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.49
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS AssessmentWeek 364.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.24
Secondary

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)

Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using AcroQoL, an acromegaly-specific quality of life instrument. The AcroQol instrument is comprised of 22 questions divided into two scales: one evaluating physical aspects (8 items) and the other that addresses psychological aspects (14 items). The psychological scale can also be further divided into subscale that evaluates physical appearance and the other subscale focused on the impact of the disease on personal relationships of the patient (7 items each). Each of the questions has a 5-item Likert scale. For each dimension the scores range from 0-4 with 0 being the lowest impact and 4 being the most severe.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 & 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 124.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.52
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 364.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.14
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 244.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.88
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 245.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.26
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 125.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.93
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 365.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 244.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.72
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 124.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.05
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 364.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.02
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 126.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.43
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 367.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.33
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 247.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.44
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 240.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 121.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.04
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 361.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.69
Secondary

Core Phase: Change in Mean Growth Hormone (GH) Values From Baseline to Week 36

Core phase - Changes in mean GH from study baseline to week 36.

Time frame: Baseline, week 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change in Mean Growth Hormone (GH) Values From Baseline to Week 36-7.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 19.51
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Change in Mean Growth Hormone (GH) Values From Baseline to Week 36-8.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 24.41
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Change in Mean Growth Hormone (GH) Values From Baseline to Week 36-2.9 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.21
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Change in Mean Growth Hormone (GH) Values From Baseline to Week 36-6.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 17.1
Secondary

Core Phase: Change in Standardized IGF-1 Values From Baseline to Week 36

Core phase - Changes in standardized IGF-1 from study baseline to week 36.

Time frame: Baseline, week 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Change in Standardized IGF-1 Values From Baseline to Week 36-1.1 percentage changeStandard Deviation 1.18
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Change in Standardized IGF-1 Values From Baseline to Week 36-0.8 percentage changeStandard Deviation 0.78
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Change in Standardized IGF-1 Values From Baseline to Week 36-1.1 percentage changeStandard Deviation 1.39
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Change in Standardized IGF-1 Values From Baseline to Week 36-1.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 1.18
Secondary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly Symptoms

Symptoms of acromegaly were collected at various visits. The measurement was to be provided on a scale of 1-15 including half sizes. Investigators asked the participants to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesias, osteoarthralgia according to a five-point score scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24 & 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Mild27.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Non/absent59.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Mild24.4 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Non/absent63.4 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Severe1.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Moderate9.8 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Mild17.1 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Severe0.8 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Moderate14.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Severe1.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Moderate8.1 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Non/absent56.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Mild20.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Non/absent37.4 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Mild26.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Severe8.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Very severe4.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Non/absent46.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Moderate17.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Non/absent47.2 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Severe7.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Very severe4.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Mild23.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Moderate13.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Severe4.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Very severe3.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Moderate18.7 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Non/absent56.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Very severe1.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Mild18.7 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Non/absent61.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Severe3.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Moderate8.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Non/absent64.2 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Severe1.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Moderate8.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Mild26.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Severe4.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Very severe0.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Mild21.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Moderate7.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Non/absent43.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Severe8.9 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Moderate14.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Very severe2.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Severe3.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Very severe4.9 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Moderate14.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Non/absent47.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Mild26.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Moderate12.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Mild27.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Severe3.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Very severe2.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Mild26.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Non/absent47.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Very severe0.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Non/absent69.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Mild13.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Severe1.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Very severe1.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Moderate5.7 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Severe0.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Non/absent72.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Non/absent69.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Mild14.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Mild15.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Moderate7.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 24: Very severe2.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 12: Severe4.9 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 0 - 4 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 36: Moderate5.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baseline

Symptoms of acromegaly were collected at various visits. The measurement was to be provided on a scale of 1-15 including half sizes. Investigators asked the participants to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesias, osteoarthralgia according to a five-point score scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24 & 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot Non/absent36.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBaseline (BL): Non/absent41.5 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.20.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Severe7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe9.8 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot. Very severe2.4 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Moderate18.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild30.9 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Very severe5.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Mild25.2 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Very severe4.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot Non/absent26.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Mild17.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBaseline (BL): Non/absent36.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe15.4 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Moderate26.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot. Very severe13.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.22.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Severe13.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild22.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBaseline (BL): Non/absent43.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Mild25.2 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Moderate18.7 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Severe8.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Very severe4.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild29.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.20.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe7.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot. Very severe5.7 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot Non/absent37.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBaseline (BL): Non/absent33.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Mild21.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot. Very severe8.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe14.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Moderate26.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild26.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.24.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Severe16.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Very severe3.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot Non/absent26.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Mild25.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Severe8.9 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild27.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Moderate10.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot. Very severe2.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.13.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr post-BL:tot Non/absent47.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe9.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBaseline (BL): Non/absent54.5 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Baseline to Most Extreme Post-baselineBL: Very severe0.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at Screening

Percentage of participants achieving IGF-1 \<ULN at weeks 12, 24 & 36.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24 & 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 1235.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 3650.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 2442.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 1216.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 3625.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 2423.4 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 240.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 120.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 360.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 1220.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 3630.9 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With IGF-1 <ULN Overall by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 2427.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN

Percentage of participants achieving GH \<1 μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at weeks 12 and 24 overall and by GH level at screening.

Time frame: Week 12, Week 24, Week 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 24: GH: ≥ 1 - ≤ 2.5 μg/L @ screening25.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 36: GH: > 2.5 μg/L @ screening7.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 12: GH: > 2.5 μg/L @ screening7.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 36: GH: ≥ 1 - ≤ 2.5 μg/L @ screening25.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 24: GH: > 2.5 μg/L @ screening7.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 12: GH: ≥ 1 - ≤ 2.5 μg/L @ screening25.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 36: GH: > 2.5 μg/L @ screening6.4 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 12: GH: Missing0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 24: GH: Missing0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 36: GH: Missing0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 12: GH: ≥ 1 - ≤ 2.5 μg/L @ screening28.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 24: GH: ≥ 1 - ≤ 2.5 μg/L @ screening39.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 36: GH: ≥ 1 - ≤ 2.5 μg/L @ screening42.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 12: GH: > 2.5 μg/L @ screening5.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULNWeek 24: GH: > 2.5 μg/L @ screening5.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Core Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status

Core phase - Percentage of patients achieving GH \<1μg/L at week 12, 24, 36 overall and by GH level at screening.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24 & 36

Population: FAS comprised all patients who had signed informed consent and had been treated with at least one dose of study medication (pasireotide LAR) after enrollment into the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 1213.5 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 3615.4 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 2413.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 3616.7 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 1210.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 2413.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 249.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 120.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgCore Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH <1 μg/L and IGF-1 <ULN Overall by Baseline Diabetic StatusWeek 360.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Extension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension Baseline

Symptoms of acromegaly were collected at various visits. The measurement was to be provided on a scale of 1-15 including half sizes. Investigators asked the participants to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesias, osteoarthralgia according to a five-point score scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).

Time frame: Weeks 48, 60 & 72

Population: Extension FAS included all the patients who received at least one dose of pasireotide LAR in the extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: tot. Very severe2.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild29.5 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.18.2 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe3.4 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Moderate9.1 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Mild20.5 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. Baseline (BL): Non/absent69.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL:tot Non/absent46.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Mild23.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Moderate12.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. Baseline (BL): Non/absent56.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Very severe2.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: tot. Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Severe4.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL:tot Non/absent51.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild22.7 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe6.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.18.2 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Moderate10.2 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL:tot Non/absent54.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.14.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild26.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. Baseline (BL): Non/absent68.2 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe4.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Mild20.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: tot. Very severe2.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. Baseline (BL): Non/absent52.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Mild30.7 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Moderate12.5 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Severe3.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL:tot Non/absent43.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild33.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe8.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.13.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Severe2.3 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL:tot Non/absent67.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Total100.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Moderate5.7 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: tot. Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mod.6.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. BL: Mild13.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineMost extr. post-BL: total Mild22.7 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension (Ext.) Phase: Percentage of Participants With Acromegaly Shift Symptoms From Extension Baseline to Most Extreme Post-extension BaselineExt. Baseline (BL): Non/absent79.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index Scores

Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on health status, measured by EQ-5D-5L, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring general health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 48, 60 & 72

Population: Extension FAS included all the patients who received at least one dose of pasireotide LAR in the extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index ScoresWeek 60-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index ScoresWeek 720.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
UnknownExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Index ScoresWeek 48 scores on a scale
Secondary

Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Assessment

Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on health status, measured by EQ-5D-5L, a valid and reliable instrument for measuring general health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20-cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 48, 60 & 72

Population: Extension FAS included all the patients who received at least one dose of pasireotide LAR in the extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS AssessmentWeek 60-10.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS AssessmentWeek 721.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
UnknownExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS AssessmentWeek 48 scores on a scale
Secondary

Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)

Evaluation of effect of pasireotide LAR on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using AcroQoL, an acromegaly-specific quality of life instrument. The AcroQol instrument is comprised of 22 questions divided into two scales: one evaluating physical aspects (8 items) and the other that addresses psychological aspects (14 items). The psychological scale can also be further divided into subscale that evaluates physical appearance and the other subscale focused on the impact of the disease on personal relationships of the patient (7 items each). Each of the questions has a 5-item Likert scale. For each dimension the scores range from 0-4 with 0 being the lowest impact and 4 being the most severe.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 48, 60 & 72

Population: Extension FAS included all the patients who received at least one dose of pasireotide LAR in the extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 60-4.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 721.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.72
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 600.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 720.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.61
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 721.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 60-7.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 60-3.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 720.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.82
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 60-10.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 722.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.82
UnknownExtension Phase: Change From Baseline in Scores as Measured by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL)Week 48 scores on a scale
Secondary

Extension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly Symptoms

Symptoms of acromegaly were collected at various visits. The measurement was to be provided on a scale of 1-15 including half sizes. Investigators asked the participants to score the following symptoms of acromegaly: headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesias, osteoarthralgia according to a five-point score scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).

Time frame: Weeks 48, 60 & 72

Population: Extension FAS included all the patients who received at least one dose of pasireotide LAR in the extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Mild17.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: None/absent60.2 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Severe2.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Mild19.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Moderate8.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Mild17.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: None/absent56.8 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Moderate8.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: None/absent63.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Severe3.4 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Moderate6.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Moderate12.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: None/absent59.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Mild17.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Severe3.4 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: None/absent48.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Mild20.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Moderate13.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Severe4.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: None/absent44.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Mild23.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Moderate10.2 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Severe4.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Mild20.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: None/absent69.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Moderate6.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Moderate9.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: None/absent61.4 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Mild15.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Mild13.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Moderate6.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: None/absent60.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: None/absent56.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: None/absent51.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Mild25.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Mild20.5 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Moderate10.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Mild14.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Severe3.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Moderate11.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: None/absent53.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Severe3.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide LAR OverallExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Moderate9.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Moderate4.5 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Moderate5.7 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: None/absent70.5 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Mild10.2 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Mild14.8 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: None/absent71.6 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Very severe1.1 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: None/absent67.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Very severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Not done0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 60: Moderate4.5 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 48: Severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Mild11.4 Percentage of participants
Pasireotide With Concomitant MedicationExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants Reporting Levels 1 - 5 by Dimensions of Acromegaly SymptomsWeek 72: Severe0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Extension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 & 72 (Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg)

Percentage of patients achieving IGF-1 \<ULN at weeks 48, 60 & 72 for participants with up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg mg

Time frame: Weeks 48, 60 & 72

Population: Extension Full Analysis Set (Extension FAS) included all the patients who received at least one dose of pasireotide LAR in the extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 & 72 (Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg)Week 485.8 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 & 72 (Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg)Week 607.1 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 & 72 (Up-titrated to Pasireotide LAR 60 mg)Week 725.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Extension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)

Percentage of participants achieving IGF-1 \<ULN at week 46, 60 and 72 overall by baseline diabetic status

Time frame: Weeks 48, 60, 72

Population: Extension FAS included all the patients who received at least one dose of pasireotide LAR in the extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 48: Diabetic11.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 60: Diabetic11.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 72: Diabetic11.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 48: Pre-diabetic11.1 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 60: Pre-diabetic16.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 72: Pre-diabetic8.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 48: Non-diabetic22.2 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 60: Non-diabetic22.2 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L and IGF-1 < ULN at Weeks 48, 60 and 72 (Overall by Baseline Diabetic Status)Week 72: Non-diabetic22.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Extension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at Screening

Percentage of patients achieving GH \<1 μg/L and IGF-1 \<ULN at week 48 by treatment with pasireotide LAR alone or with concomitant medications used to treat acromegaly

Time frame: Weeks 48, 60, 72

Population: Extension FAS included all the patients who received at least one dose of pasireotide LAR in the extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk48: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening11.9 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk48:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.76.5 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 72: Pasireotide LAR overall23.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk60: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening11.9 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 60: Pasireotide LAR overall25.0 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 48: Pasireotide LAR overall26.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk72:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.64.7 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk60:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.70.6 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide 120 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk72: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening11.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 60: Pasireotide LAR overall0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk48:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk60:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk72:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk48: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening11.1 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk60: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 48: Pasireotide LAR overall8.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 72: Pasireotide LAR overall0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 30 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk72: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening0.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 48: Pasireotide LAR overall23.9 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 60: Pasireotide LAR overall21.6 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk48: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening11.8 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk60:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.60.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWeek 72: Pasireotide LAR overall20.5 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk72:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.55.0 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk72: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening10.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk60: GH: > 2.5 μg/L at screening10.3 Percentage of participants
Octreotide 40 mgExtension Phase: Percentage of Participants With Mean GH < 1 μg/L at Weeks 48, 60, 72 and Overall, Pasireotide Montherapy and Pasireotide With Concomittant Medication and by GH Level at ScreeningWk48:GH: >= 1 - <= 2.5 μg/L at screen.65.0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026