Skip to content

Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GC6101A in Subjects With Gastritis

Double Blind, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GC6101A in Subjects With Gastritis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02353039
Enrollment
200
Registered
2015-02-02
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2015-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the investigational products in the patients with gastritis during their participation in the study.

Detailed description

GC6101A is botanical drug products made from the Lonicerae Flos. Two hundred volunteers will participate in the study, receive 2-week treatment with GC6101A or placebo.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Administer placebo t.i.d for 2 weeks

DRUGGC6101A 37.5mg

Administer 12.5mg of GC6101A t.i.d for 2 weeks.

DRUGGC6101A 75mg

Administer 25mg of GC6101A t.i.d for 2 weeks.

DRUGGC6101A 150mg

Administer 50mg of GC6101A t.i.d for 2 weeks.

Sponsors

C&R Research, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
CRScube
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Green Cross Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age is over 19 years old, men or women * Patients diagnosed with acute or chronic gastritis by gastroscopy * Patients with one or more erosions found by gastroscopy * Signed the informed consent forms

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who is impossible to receive gastroscopy * Patients with peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux disease * Patients with gastroesophageal surgery and surgery to reduce the secretion of gastric acid (Except for surgery for perforated peptic ulcer and cecectomy) * Patients with esophageal varix * Patients with malignant neoplasm of gastrointestinal tract * Patients with thrombosis or administered with anti-thrombotic drugs * Patients with consumption coagulopathy * Patients administered with H2 receptor antagonists, muscarinic receptor antagonists, gastrin receptor antagonist, proton pump inhibitors, prostaglandins or mucosal protective agents prior to study in 2 weeks * Patient who cannot interrupt steroid, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin during treatment * Allergic or hypersensitive to any of the ingredients in the test products * Pregnant or lactating female * Patients who have abnormal baseline laboratory test result * Patients taking other investigational drugs within 30 days prior to the study. * Patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome * Patients that investigators consider ineligible for this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A percentage of subjects showed moderate improvement of stomach erosions by the endoscopy2 weeksThe definition of moderate improvement is the subjects showed score changed from 2-4 to 1 or from 4 to 2. \[score 1(normal) : no erosion, score 2(mild) : 1-2 erosions, score 3(moderate) : 3-5 erosions, score 4(severe) : 6 or more erosions\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A percentage of subjects showed improvement of edema rating scale2 weeksThe definition of improvement is the subjects showed score changed from 2 to 1.
A percentage of subjects showed improvement of erythema rating scale2 weeksThe definition of improvement is the subjects showed reduction ratio of score changed 50% or more.
A percentage of subjects showed improvement of hemorrhage rating scale2 weeksThe definition of improvement is the subjects showed reduction ratio of score changed 50% or more.
A percentage of subjects showed improvement of gastric symptom rating scale2 weeksThe definition of improvement is the subjects showed reduction ratio of score changed 50% or more.
A percentage of subjects showed significant improvement of stomach erosions by the endoscopy2 weeksThe definition of significant improvement is the subject showed score changed from 2-4 to 1. \[score 1(normal) : no erosion, score 2(mild) : 1-2 erosions, score 3(moderate) : 3-5 erosions, score 4(severe) : 6 or more erosions\]
Lab results(Hematology, Blood chemistry, Urinalysis)2 weeks
The results of physical examinations and Vital signs(body temperature, pulse)2 weeks
EKG results2 weeks
Adverse Events2 weeks

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactDong-Min Kim, B.S.
dreamerkdm@greencross.com+82-31-260-1936

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026