Skip to content

Effects of Atx and Oros-mph on Executive Functions

Effects of Atomoxetine and Oros-mph on Executive Functions in Patients With Combined Type Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02352051
Enrollment
43
Registered
2015-02-02
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2015-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Executive Dysfunction

Keywords

attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)., executive functions

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of Atomoxetine(ATX) and osmotic release oral system-methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) therapies on executive functions, activities, treatment response time and adverse effects based on discernible clinical effects in children with combined type attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of Atomoxetine(ATX) and osmotic release oral system-methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) therapies on executive functions, activities, treatment response time and adverse effects based on discernible clinical effects in children with combined type attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In this study, the functional capabilities of the patients who clinically responded well to therapy were assessed simultaneously with clinical response that may appear at different time periods and the treatment groups were compared in patients who responded to therapy by excluding patients with insufficient clinical response.

Interventions

DRUGAtomoxetine

the drug was initiated at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day which was then gradually increased at 2-week intervals and it was attempted to titrate the dose to 1.2 mg/kg/day.

DRUGmethylphenidate

the drug was initiated at the lowest commercially available dose this was then increased at one-month intervals and it was attempted to titrate the dose to 1 mg/kg/day using daily doses of 36-54 mg

Sponsors

TC Erciyes University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Combined type ADHD diagnosis was made by a child psychiatrist according to DSM-IV criteria through K-SADS interview with the patient and mother * The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-S) was applied to determine ADHD severity and patients with a CGI-S score≥4

Exclusion criteria

* Psychological, neurological or psychiatric diseases other than ADHD, * ADHD types other than combined type, * Medication that influences cognitive processes or history of such medication, * WISC-R scores \<80 or \>120

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects of Atx and Oros-mph on Executive Functions, measured by Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop Test TBAG Form and Visual Auditory Digit Span B20 weeksWisconsin Card Sorting Test:WCST measures cognitive processes such as administrative control, characterization, perseveration, executive function, conceptualization, abstract thinking and reasoning, and it is mainly linked to frontal lobe . Stroop Test TBAG Form:Stroop test is closely related to frontal lobe and many other serebral regions. It provides information about several cognitive processes such as selective attention, response inhibition, interference control and input processing speed. Visual Auditory Digit Span B:VADS B is a test measures short-term memory, sequencing and sensorimotor integration. The tests were applied to all patients after diagnosis and evaluations.Recovery score decreasing to 2 or 1 according to CGI-I was set as time for repetition of tests. The tests were repeated at any time of day in ATX group while they were repeated within first 60-180 minutes after ingestion of drug in OROS MPH group.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026