Skip to content

Cementless Oxford Partial Knee Controlled Observational Study

Cementless Oxford Partial Knee Retrospective and Prospective Controlled Multi-center Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02350049
Acronym
GK10
Enrollment
391
Registered
2015-01-29
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2017-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Avascular Necrosis, Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Cementless Oxford Partial Knee System.

Detailed description

The study is designed to document and compare the clinical and radiographic results of the Cementless Oxford Partial Knee System (investigational device) to those of the cemented Oxford Partial Knee System (control device).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* have primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis limited to the medial compartment of the knee * signed informed consent for patients contributing to investigational or control if required * Male or female over the age of 21 years at the time of surgery * Undergone primary partial knee arthroplasty as unilateral arthroplasty or bilateral arthroplasty, simultaneously or otherwise * Patients that are current residents of the United Kingdom

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis at the time of surgery * Use in the lateral compartment of the knee * Rheumatoid arthritis or other forms of inflammatory joint disease * Revision of a failed prosthesis, failed upper tibial osteotomy or post-traumatic arthritis after tibial plateau fracture * Insufficiency of the collateral, anterior, or posterior cruciate ligaments which would preclude stability of the device * Partial or full thickness cartilage disease or damage to central part of the lateral femoral condyle * Osteoporosis or insufficient bone stock * Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation * Osteomalacia * Distant foci of infection which may spread to the implant site * Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss, or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram * Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, neuromuscular disease * Incomplete or deficient soft tissue surrounding the knee * Charcot's disease * A fixed varus deformity (not passively correctable) of greater than 15 degrees * A flexion deformity greater than 15 degrees * Refuse to sign informed consent if it is required * Patients that are not current residents of the United Kingdom

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Endpoint- Safety & Efficacy (Radiographic Success, American Knee Society Score, Absence of Revision / Removal / Unanticipated Adverse Device Affects)22+monthsRadiographic Success, American Knee Society Score, Absence of Revision / Removal / Unanticipated Adverse Device Affects

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survivorship (Cementless Only)22+ MonthsMinimum 1,000 cases to assess survivorship of cementless components
American Knee Society Score0-16 Week, 6 Month, 12 MonthAssessment of Function and Range of Motion; retrospective study- data will be collected if available
Oxford Knee Score0-16 Weeks, 6 Months, 12 Months, 22+ MonthsRetrospective study; data will be collected if available.
Adverse EventsThrough 22+ Months Postop

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026