Skip to content

A Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled 24-Week Study Followed by Long Term Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug-Experienced Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02349295
Acronym
SPIRIT-P2
Enrollment
363
Registered
2015-01-28
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2019-06-26
Last updated
2020-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriatic Arthritis

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate how effective and safe the study drug known as ixekizumab is in participants with active psoriatic arthritis.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

DRUGIxekizumab 80 mg Q4W

Administered SC

DRUGIxekizumab 80 mg Q2W

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presents with established diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months, and currently meets Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria * Active PsA defined as the presence of at least 3 tender and at least 3 swollen joints * Presence of active psoriatic skin lesion or a history of plaque psoriasis (Ps) * Men must agree to use a reliable method of birth control or remain abstinent during the study * Women must agree to use reliable birth control or remain abstinent during the study and for at least 12 weeks after stopping treatment * Have been treated with 1 or more conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) * Have had prior treatment with at least 1 and not more than 2 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. The participant must have discontinued at least 1 TNF inhibitor due to either an inadequate response (based on a minimum of 12 weeks on therapy) or documented intolerance.

Exclusion criteria

* Current use of biologic agents for treatment of Ps or PsA * Inadequate response to greater than 2 biologic DMARDs * Current use of more than one cDMARDs * Diagnosis of active inflammatory arthritic syndromes or spondyloarthropathies other than PsA * Have received treatment with interleukin (IL) -17 or IL12/23 targeted monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapy * Serious disorder or illness other than psoriatic arthritis * Serious infection within the last 3 months * Breastfeeding or nursing (lactating) women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20)Week 24ACR20 response is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (PatGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS (PGA), Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or Acute Phase Reactant as measured by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20Week 12ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50)Week 24ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70)Week 24ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75Week 12The PASI is an index that combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation, erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI compared to their baseline measures.
Percentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)Week 24It uses a composite of 7 key outcome measures (includes PASI) used in PsA to encompass all of the domains of the disease to measure the overall state of a patients' disease. The LEI is used to assess tender entheseal points. Patients are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures: 1. TJC ≤1, 2. SJC ≤1, 3. PASI total score ≤1 or BSA ≤3, 4. patient pain VAS score of ≤15, 5. patient global VAS score of ≤20, 6. HAQ-DI score ≤0.5, 7. tender entheseal points (6 entheseal points) ≤1.
Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)Week 24The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle, left and right; medial femoral condyle, left and right; Achilles tendon insertion, left and right). Each site was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site were then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6). So, 0 indicates good score here.
Change From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Baseline, Week 12The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participants itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)Baseline, Week 24TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)Baseline, Week 24SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, Week 24The pain VAS is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure current joint pain from Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using a 100-millimeter(mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's joint pain from PsA is indicated by marking a vertical tick on the horizontal 100-mm scale, where the left end from 0 mm (no pain) to right end 100 mm (worst possible joint pain). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VASBaseline, Week 24The patient's overall assessment of his or her PsA activity will be recorded using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VASBaseline, Week 24The investigator will be asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ScoreBaseline, Week 24HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability(physical function).It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming,arising,eating,walking,hygiene,reach,grip and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on degree of difficulty (0=without any difficulty,1=with some difficulty,2=with much difficulty,3=unable to do)covering the 8 domains.The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability.The reported use of special aids/devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed.Least Square (LS) mean calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment,baseline score,geographic region, TNFi experience,visit, treatment-by-visit interaction(itcn), geographic region-by-visit itcn,TNFi experience-by-visit itcn and baseline score-by-visit itcn.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)Baseline, Week 24The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP (measured in mg/L), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ScoreBaseline, Week 24The BASDAI is a self-administered measure used to answer 6 questions with a 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) VAS pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of axial activity. To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean of the 2 scores relating to morning stiffness was taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI Score. BASDAI ranges from 0-10. Higher scores represent greater disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 24The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rated their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Baseline, Week 24The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Baseline, Week 24The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)Week 24Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ixekizumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group.
Pharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of IxekizumabAll immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV)The Ctrough is the minimum observed serum concentration at steady state of Ixekizumab. The Ctrough at Week 24 was reported.
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of IxekizumabAll immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV)The AUC(Tau,Steady State) is the area under the concentration-time curve for dosing interval (Tau) at steady state of ixekizumab (Tau is 28 days for 80 mg Q4W cohort, and is 14 days for 80mg Q2W cohort, respectively).
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 52 and Week 156ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 52 and Week 156ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 52 and Week 156ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, Week 24C-reactive protein (CRP) is a disease related biomarker and measured in milligrams per liter. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Countries

Australia, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo for ixekizumab as 2 SC injections followed by 1 SC injection Q2W given on Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14. Inadequate responders at Week 16 receive rescue therapy and re-randomized (1:1) to either ixekizumab group, receiving a starting dose of 160 mg at Week 16 given as 2 SC injections followed by 80 mg given as 1 injection according to ixekizumab regimen: Q2W or Q4W (with placebo every other dose). All other participants continue placebo as 1 injection Q2W given on Weeks 16, 18, 20 and 22
118
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W
Participants received a starting dose of 160 mg of ixekizumab given as 2 SC injections at Week 0 followed by 1 SC injection of 80 mg of ixekizumab Q4W given on Weeks 4, 8 and 12 alternating with placebo for ixekizumab injections Q4W given on Weeks 2, 6, 10 and 14. Inadequate responders at Week 16 receive rescue therapy while continuing ixekizumab given as 1 injection of 80 mg Q4W given on Weeks 16 and 20 alternating with placebo for ixekizumab injections Q4W given on Weeks 18 and 22. All other participants continue 80 mg given as 1 injection Q2W given on Weeks 16 and 20 alternating with placebo for ixekizumab injections Q4W given on Weeks 18 and 22
122
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W
Participants received a starting dose of 160 mg of ixekizumab given as 2 SC injections at Week 0 followed by 1 SC injection of 80 mg of ixekizumab Q2W given on Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14. Inadequate responders at Week 16 receive rescue therapy while continuing ixekizumab given as 1 injection of 80 mg Q2W given on Weeks 16, 18, 20 and 22. All other participants continue 80 mg given as 1 injection Q2W given on Weeks 16, 18, 20 and 22
123
Total363

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012FG013
Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24)Adverse Event75500000000000
Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24)Failure To Meet Randomization01100000000000
Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24)Lack of Efficacy42900000000000
Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24)Lost to Follow-up11200000000000
Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24)Withdrawal by Subject22700000000000
Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks)Adverse Event00000000000110
Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up00000000000120
Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks)Physician Decision00000000000200
Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks)Unknown/Missing00000000000400
Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject00000000000151
IR (Week 16-24)Lack of Efficacy00010000000000
Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156)Adverse Event00000009922000
Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156)Death00000001110000
Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156)Lack of Efficacy000000032251918000
Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156)Lost to Follow-up00000002200000
Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156)Physician Decision00000002200000
Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156)Unknown/Missing00000002030000
Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156)Withdrawal by Subject00000004213000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIxekizumab 80 mg Q4WIxekizumab 80 mg Q2WTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.57
51.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.85
51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
51.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.39
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants13 Participants35 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
109 Participants109 Participants324 Participants106 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants7 Participants21 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
111 Participants113 Participants332 Participants108 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
2 Participants3 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
4 Participants8 Participants20 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
6 Participants5 Participants17 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
13 Participants12 Participants36 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
4 Participants5 Participants14 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
16 Participants14 Participants45 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
6 Participants7 Participants19 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
6 Participants5 Participants16 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
65 Participants63 Participants188 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
59 Participants73 Participants194 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants50 Participants169 Participants56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 12358 / 12240 / 1185 / 178 / 1511 / 168 / 1659 / 10765 / 11120 / 4632 / 4616 / 14213 / 1452 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 1233 / 1224 / 1180 / 170 / 150 / 161 / 1610 / 10713 / 1116 / 463 / 461 / 1422 / 1452 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20)

ACR20 response is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (PatGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS (PGA), Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or Acute Phase Reactant as measured by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. Non-responder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20)19.5 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20)53.3 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20)48.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.65, 8.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: model includes: treatment, geographic region, and TNFi experience (inadequate responder to 1 TNFi, inadequate responder to 2 TNFi, or intolerance to a TNFi)p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.12, 6.78]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS)

The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline MCS data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS)0.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.32
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS)3.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.24
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS)4.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.18
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS)

The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline PCS data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS)3.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.36
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS)8.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.29
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS)8.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a disease related biomarker and measured in milligrams per liter. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline CRP data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-3.6 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.87
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-11.8 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.76
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-9.8 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)

The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP (measured in mg/L), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline DAS28-CRP data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)-0.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.2
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)-2.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.19
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)-1.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.18
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score

The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rated their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline fatigue NRS data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-0.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.37
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.35
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-2.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.34
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability(physical function).It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming,arising,eating,walking,hygiene,reach,grip and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on degree of difficulty (0=without any difficulty,1=with some difficulty,2=with much difficulty,3=unable to do)covering the 8 domains.The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability.The reported use of special aids/devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed.Least Square (LS) mean calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment,baseline score,geographic region, TNFi experience,visit, treatment-by-visit interaction(itcn), geographic region-by-visit itcn,TNFi experience-by-visit itcn and baseline score-by-visit itcn.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participants itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline psoriatic lesion(s) involving \>=3% BSA, baseline itch NRS score and post baseline itch NRS score data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-0.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.4
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-3.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.39
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-3.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.39
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The pain VAS is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure current joint pain from Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using a 100-millimeter(mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's joint pain from PsA is indicated by marking a vertical tick on the horizontal 100-mm scale, where the left end from 0 mm (no pain) to right end 100 mm (worst possible joint pain). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline TJC and SJC data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-21.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.97
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-36.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.74
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-33.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.58
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS

The patient's overall assessment of his or her PsA activity will be recorded using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-19.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.91
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-40.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.68
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-37.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS

The investigator will be asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-18.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.98
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-40.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.85
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-37.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)

SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline SJC data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-5.0 Swollen Joint CountStandard Error 1.05
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-8.5 Swollen Joint CountStandard Error 0.99
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-7.4 Swollen Joint CountStandard Error 0.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)

TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline TJC data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)-6.2 Tender Joint CountStandard Error 1.96
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)-12.7 Tender Joint CountStandard Error 1.87
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)-12.5 Tender Joint CountStandard Error 1.77
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score

The BASDAI is a self-administered measure used to answer 6 questions with a 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) VAS pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of axial activity. To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean of the 2 scores relating to morning stiffness was taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI Score. BASDAI ranges from 0-10. Higher scores represent greater disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline axial involvement defined as baseline BASDAI score \>4, baseline BASDAI score and post baseline BASDAI score data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score-2.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.38
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score-3.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.36
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WChange From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score-3.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.35
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)

Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ixekizumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of ixekizumab and had evaluable anti-ixekizumab antibody measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)1 Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)8 Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20

ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR2022.0 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR2050.0 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR2048.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20

ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 52 and Week 156

Population: All randomized participants. Non-responder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at week 16 and participants who discontinued on or prior to week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 5258.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 15642.1 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 15650.5 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 5267.6 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 5250.0 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 15639.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment PeriodPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 5260.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment PeriodPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20Week 15645.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50

ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 52 and Week 156

Population: All randomized participants. Non-responder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at week 16 and participants who discontinued on or prior to week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 5238.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 15629.0 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 15635.1 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 5245.9 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 5234.8 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 15626.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment PeriodPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 5243.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment PeriodPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50Week 15634.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70

ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 52 and Week 156

Population: All randomized participants. Non-responder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at week 16 and participants who discontinued on or prior to week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 5220.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 15622.4 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 15621.6 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 5228.8 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 5215.2 Percentage of participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 15610.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment PeriodPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 5223.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment PeriodPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70Week 15619.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50)

ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50)5.1 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50)35.2 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50)33.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70)

ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70)0 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70)22.1 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70)12.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75

The PASI is an index that combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation, erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI compared to their baseline measures.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants with baseline psoriatic lesion(s) involving ≥3% body surface area (BSA). NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 7510.4 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 7557.4 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 7561.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)

The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle, left and right; medial femoral condyle, left and right; Achilles tendon insertion, left and right). Each site was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site were then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6). So, 0 indicates good score here.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline enthesitis, baseline LEI score and post baseline LEI score data. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)21.7 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)35.3 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)31.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)

It uses a composite of 7 key outcome measures (includes PASI) used in PsA to encompass all of the domains of the disease to measure the overall state of a patients' disease. The LEI is used to assess tender entheseal points. Patients are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures: 1. TJC ≤1, 2. SJC ≤1, 3. PASI total score ≤1 or BSA ≤3, 4. patient pain VAS score of ≤15, 5. patient global VAS score of ≤20, 6. HAQ-DI score ≤0.5, 7. tender entheseal points (6 entheseal points) ≤1.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)3.4 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPercentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)27.9 Percentage of Participants
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WPercentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)23.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of Ixekizumab

The AUC(Tau,Steady State) is the area under the concentration-time curve for dosing interval (Tau) at steady state of ixekizumab (Tau is 28 days for 80 mg Q4W cohort, and is 14 days for 80mg Q2W cohort, respectively).

Time frame: All immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV)

Population: The PK Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had evaluable ixekizumab PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of Ixekizumab141 mcg*day/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 59.3
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of Ixekizumab143 mcg*day/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57.5
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Ixekizumab

The Ctrough is the minimum observed serum concentration at steady state of Ixekizumab. The Ctrough at Week 24 was reported.

Time frame: All immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV)

Population: The PK Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had evaluable ixekizumab PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Ixekizumab2.46 micograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79.1
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WPharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Ixekizumab7.96 micograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026