Psoriatic Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate how effective and safe the study drug known as ixekizumab is in participants with active psoriatic arthritis.
Interventions
Administered SC
Administered SC
Administered SC
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Presents with established diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months, and currently meets Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria * Active PsA defined as the presence of at least 3 tender and at least 3 swollen joints * Presence of active psoriatic skin lesion or a history of plaque psoriasis (Ps) * Men must agree to use a reliable method of birth control or remain abstinent during the study * Women must agree to use reliable birth control or remain abstinent during the study and for at least 12 weeks after stopping treatment * Have been treated with 1 or more conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) * Have had prior treatment with at least 1 and not more than 2 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. The participant must have discontinued at least 1 TNF inhibitor due to either an inadequate response (based on a minimum of 12 weeks on therapy) or documented intolerance.
Exclusion criteria
* Current use of biologic agents for treatment of Ps or PsA * Inadequate response to greater than 2 biologic DMARDs * Current use of more than one cDMARDs * Diagnosis of active inflammatory arthritic syndromes or spondyloarthropathies other than PsA * Have received treatment with interleukin (IL) -17 or IL12/23 targeted monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapy * Serious disorder or illness other than psoriatic arthritis * Serious infection within the last 3 months * Breastfeeding or nursing (lactating) women
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20) | Week 24 | ACR20 response is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (PatGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS (PGA), Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or Acute Phase Reactant as measured by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 | Week 12 | ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50) | Week 24 | ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70) | Week 24 | ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP. |
| Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 | Week 12 | The PASI is an index that combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation, erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI compared to their baseline measures. |
| Percentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) | Week 24 | It uses a composite of 7 key outcome measures (includes PASI) used in PsA to encompass all of the domains of the disease to measure the overall state of a patients' disease. The LEI is used to assess tender entheseal points. Patients are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures: 1. TJC ≤1, 2. SJC ≤1, 3. PASI total score ≤1 or BSA ≤3, 4. patient pain VAS score of ≤15, 5. patient global VAS score of ≤20, 6. HAQ-DI score ≤0.5, 7. tender entheseal points (6 entheseal points) ≤1. |
| Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) | Week 24 | The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle, left and right; medial femoral condyle, left and right; Achilles tendon insertion, left and right). Each site was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site were then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6). So, 0 indicates good score here. |
| Change From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | Baseline, Week 12 | The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participants itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) | Baseline, Week 24 | TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Baseline, Week 24 | SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Baseline, Week 24 | The pain VAS is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure current joint pain from Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using a 100-millimeter(mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's joint pain from PsA is indicated by marking a vertical tick on the horizontal 100-mm scale, where the left end from 0 mm (no pain) to right end 100 mm (worst possible joint pain). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS | Baseline, Week 24 | The patient's overall assessment of his or her PsA activity will be recorded using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS | Baseline, Week 24 | The investigator will be asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Baseline, Week 24 | HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability(physical function).It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming,arising,eating,walking,hygiene,reach,grip and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on degree of difficulty (0=without any difficulty,1=with some difficulty,2=with much difficulty,3=unable to do)covering the 8 domains.The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability.The reported use of special aids/devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed.Least Square (LS) mean calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment,baseline score,geographic region, TNFi experience,visit, treatment-by-visit interaction(itcn), geographic region-by-visit itcn,TNFi experience-by-visit itcn and baseline score-by-visit itcn. |
| Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) | Baseline, Week 24 | The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP (measured in mg/L), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score | Baseline, Week 24 | The BASDAI is a self-administered measure used to answer 6 questions with a 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) VAS pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of axial activity. To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean of the 2 scores relating to morning stiffness was taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI Score. BASDAI ranges from 0-10. Higher scores represent greater disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | Baseline, Week 24 | The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rated their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) | Baseline, Week 24 | The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS) | Baseline, Week 24 | The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA) | Week 24 | Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ixekizumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Ixekizumab | All immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV) | The Ctrough is the minimum observed serum concentration at steady state of Ixekizumab. The Ctrough at Week 24 was reported. |
| Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of Ixekizumab | All immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV) | The AUC(Tau,Steady State) is the area under the concentration-time curve for dosing interval (Tau) at steady state of ixekizumab (Tau is 28 days for 80 mg Q4W cohort, and is 14 days for 80mg Q2W cohort, respectively). |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 52 and Week 156 | ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 52 and Week 156 | ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 52 and Week 156 | ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP. |
| Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | Baseline, Week 24 | C-reactive protein (CRP) is a disease related biomarker and measured in milligrams per liter. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction. |
Countries
Australia, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received placebo for ixekizumab as 2 SC injections followed by 1 SC injection Q2W given on Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14. Inadequate responders at Week 16 receive rescue therapy and re-randomized (1:1) to either ixekizumab group, receiving a starting dose of 160 mg at Week 16 given as 2 SC injections followed by 80 mg given as 1 injection according to ixekizumab regimen: Q2W or Q4W (with placebo every other dose). All other participants continue placebo as 1 injection Q2W given on Weeks 16, 18, 20 and 22 | 118 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W Participants received a starting dose of 160 mg of ixekizumab given as 2 SC injections at Week 0 followed by 1 SC injection of 80 mg of ixekizumab Q4W given on Weeks 4, 8 and 12 alternating with placebo for ixekizumab injections Q4W given on Weeks 2, 6, 10 and 14. Inadequate responders at Week 16 receive rescue therapy while continuing ixekizumab given as 1 injection of 80 mg Q4W given on Weeks 16 and 20 alternating with placebo for ixekizumab injections Q4W given on Weeks 18 and 22. All other participants continue 80 mg given as 1 injection Q2W given on Weeks 16 and 20 alternating with placebo for ixekizumab injections Q4W given on Weeks 18 and 22 | 122 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W Participants received a starting dose of 160 mg of ixekizumab given as 2 SC injections at Week 0 followed by 1 SC injection of 80 mg of ixekizumab Q2W given on Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14. Inadequate responders at Week 16 receive rescue therapy while continuing ixekizumab given as 1 injection of 80 mg Q2W given on Weeks 16, 18, 20 and 22. All other participants continue 80 mg given as 1 injection Q2W given on Weeks 16, 18, 20 and 22 | 123 |
| Total | 363 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 | FG007 | FG008 | FG009 | FG010 | FG011 | FG012 | FG013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24) | Adverse Event | 7 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24) | Failure To Meet Randomization | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24) | Lack of Efficacy | 4 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24) | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double Blind Treatment (Week 0-24) | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks) | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks) | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks) | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks) | Unknown/Missing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Follow-Up Period (Up to 12-24 Weeks) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| IR (Week 16-24) | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156) | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156) | Death | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156) | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 25 | 19 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156) | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156) | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156) | Unknown/Missing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Long-Term Extension Period (Week 24-156) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 52.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.57 | 51.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.85 | 51.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 | 51.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.39 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 11 Participants | 13 Participants | 35 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 109 Participants | 109 Participants | 324 Participants | 106 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 21 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 111 Participants | 113 Participants | 332 Participants | 108 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 20 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 6 Participants | 5 Participants | 17 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 36 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 14 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 16 Participants | 14 Participants | 45 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 19 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 6 Participants | 5 Participants | 16 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 65 Participants | 63 Participants | 188 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 59 Participants | 73 Participants | 194 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 63 Participants | 50 Participants | 169 Participants | 56 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk | EG009 affected / at risk | EG010 affected / at risk | EG011 affected / at risk | EG012 affected / at risk | EG013 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 58 / 123 | 58 / 122 | 40 / 118 | 5 / 17 | 8 / 15 | 11 / 16 | 8 / 16 | 59 / 107 | 65 / 111 | 20 / 46 | 32 / 46 | 16 / 142 | 13 / 145 | 2 / 17 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 8 / 123 | 3 / 122 | 4 / 118 | 0 / 17 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 16 | 1 / 16 | 10 / 107 | 13 / 111 | 6 / 46 | 3 / 46 | 1 / 142 | 2 / 145 | 2 / 17 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20)
ACR20 response is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (PatGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS (PGA), Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or Acute Phase Reactant as measured by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).
Time frame: Week 24
Population: All randomized participants. Non-responder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20) | 19.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20) | 53.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20) | 48.0 Percentage of Participants |
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS)
The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline MCS data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS) | 0.9 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.32 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS) | 3.6 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.24 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS) | 4.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.18 |
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS)
The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline PCS data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) | 3.3 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.36 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) | 8.9 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.29 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) | 8.2 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.23 |
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a disease related biomarker and measured in milligrams per liter. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline CRP data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -3.6 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 1.87 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -11.8 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 1.76 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -9.8 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 1.68 |
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP (measured in mg/L), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline DAS28-CRP data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) | -0.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) | -2.1 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.19 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) | -1.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score
The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rated their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline fatigue NRS data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -0.7 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.37 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -2.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.35 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -2.1 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability(physical function).It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming,arising,eating,walking,hygiene,reach,grip and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on degree of difficulty (0=without any difficulty,1=with some difficulty,2=with much difficulty,3=unable to do)covering the 8 domains.The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability.The reported use of special aids/devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed.Least Square (LS) mean calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment,baseline score,geographic region, TNFi experience,visit, treatment-by-visit interaction(itcn), geographic region-by-visit itcn,TNFi experience-by-visit itcn and baseline score-by-visit itcn.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
Change From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participants itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: All randomized participants who had baseline psoriatic lesion(s) involving \>=3% BSA, baseline itch NRS score and post baseline itch NRS score data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | -0.7 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | -3.4 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.39 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | -3.3 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.39 |
Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The pain VAS is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure current joint pain from Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using a 100-millimeter(mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's joint pain from PsA is indicated by marking a vertical tick on the horizontal 100-mm scale, where the left end from 0 mm (no pain) to right end 100 mm (worst possible joint pain). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline TJC and SJC data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | -21.4 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.97 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | -36.9 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.74 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | -33.5 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.58 |
Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS
The patient's overall assessment of his or her PsA activity will be recorded using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS | -19.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.91 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS | -40.7 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.68 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS | -37.3 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.53 |
Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS
The investigator will be asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS | -18.3 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.98 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS | -40.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.85 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS | -37.9 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 3.75 |
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline SJC data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | -5.0 Swollen Joint Count | Standard Error 1.05 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | -8.5 Swollen Joint Count | Standard Error 0.99 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | -7.4 Swollen Joint Count | Standard Error 0.94 |
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)
TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline TJC data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) | -6.2 Tender Joint Count | Standard Error 1.96 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) | -12.7 Tender Joint Count | Standard Error 1.87 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) | -12.5 Tender Joint Count | Standard Error 1.77 |
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score
The BASDAI is a self-administered measure used to answer 6 questions with a 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) VAS pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of axial activity. To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean of the 2 scores relating to morning stiffness was taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI Score. BASDAI ranges from 0-10. Higher scores represent greater disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who had baseline axial involvement defined as baseline BASDAI score \>4, baseline BASDAI score and post baseline BASDAI score data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score | -2.1 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score | -3.7 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score | -3.6 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.35 |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)
Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ixekizumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of ixekizumab and had evaluable anti-ixekizumab antibody measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA) | 1 Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA) | 8 Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA) | 4 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 | 22.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 | 50.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 | 48.0 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Time frame: Week 52 and Week 156
Population: All randomized participants. Non-responder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at week 16 and participants who discontinued on or prior to week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 52 | 58.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 156 | 42.1 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 156 | 50.5 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 52 | 67.6 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 52 | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 156 | 39.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment Period | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 52 | 60.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment Period | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20 | Week 156 | 45.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Time frame: Week 52 and Week 156
Population: All randomized participants. Non-responder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at week 16 and participants who discontinued on or prior to week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 52 | 38.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 156 | 29.0 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 156 | 35.1 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 52 | 45.9 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 52 | 34.8 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 156 | 26.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment Period | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 52 | 43.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment Period | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50 | Week 156 | 34.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Time frame: Week 52 and Week 156
Population: All randomized participants. Non-responder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at week 16 and participants who discontinued on or prior to week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 52 | 20.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 156 | 22.4 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 156 | 21.6 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 52 | 28.8 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 52 | 15.2 Percentage of participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 156 | 10.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment Period | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 52 | 23.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo/ Ixe 80 mg Q4W - Extended Treatment Period | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70 | Week 156 | 19.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50)
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50) | 5.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50) | 35.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50) | 33.3 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70)
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70) | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70) | 22.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70) | 12.2 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75
The PASI is an index that combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation, erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI compared to their baseline measures.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: All randomized participants with baseline psoriatic lesion(s) involving ≥3% body surface area (BSA). NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 | 10.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 | 57.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 | 61.8 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)
The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle, left and right; medial femoral condyle, left and right; Achilles tendon insertion, left and right). Each site was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site were then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6). So, 0 indicates good score here.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: All randomized participants who had baseline enthesitis, baseline LEI score and post baseline LEI score data. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) | 21.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) | 35.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) | 31.0 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)
It uses a composite of 7 key outcome measures (includes PASI) used in PsA to encompass all of the domains of the disease to measure the overall state of a patients' disease. The LEI is used to assess tender entheseal points. Patients are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures: 1. TJC ≤1, 2. SJC ≤1, 3. PASI total score ≤1 or BSA ≤3, 4. patient pain VAS score of ≤15, 5. patient global VAS score of ≤20, 6. HAQ-DI score ≤0.5, 7. tender entheseal points (6 entheseal points) ≤1.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) | 3.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Percentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) | 27.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W | Percentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) | 23.6 Percentage of Participants |
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of Ixekizumab
The AUC(Tau,Steady State) is the area under the concentration-time curve for dosing interval (Tau) at steady state of ixekizumab (Tau is 28 days for 80 mg Q4W cohort, and is 14 days for 80mg Q2W cohort, respectively).
Time frame: All immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV)
Population: The PK Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had evaluable ixekizumab PK data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of Ixekizumab | 141 mcg*day/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.3 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of Ixekizumab | 143 mcg*day/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.5 |
Pharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Ixekizumab
The Ctrough is the minimum observed serum concentration at steady state of Ixekizumab. The Ctrough at Week 24 was reported.
Time frame: All immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV)
Population: The PK Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had evaluable ixekizumab PK data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Ixekizumab | 2.46 micograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79.1 |
| Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W | Pharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Ixekizumab | 7.96 micograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.1 |