Skip to content

Standard Versus Transepithelial Corneal Crosslinking

Standard Versus Transepithelial Corneal Crosslinking for Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02349165
Enrollment
61
Registered
2015-01-28
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2015-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus

Brief summary

The gold standard corneal crosslinking (CXL) technique involves the initial step of epithelial removal, in order to achieve a sufficient treatment effect (meaning: stabilisation of progressive keratoconus (KC). Our aim is to evaluate the effects of transepithelial CXL (TE-CXL), whereby the epithelium is left intact and the cornea is instead treated by a solution composed of 0.1% riboflavin, combined with enhancers, after which standard CXL is performed. This solution seems to facilitate riboflavin penetration into the corneal stroma through the intact epithelium. The investigators expect to achieve a similar effect of TE-CXL with the advantage of a faster healing time and less risk of infections.

Interventions

PROCEDURETransepithelial versus epithelium-off CXL

A comparison of the CXL procedure with and without epithelium removal

DRUGRicrolin TE

Ricrolin TE was instilled during 30 minutes before ultraviolet-A irradiation

After epithelium removal, isotonic riboflavin was instilled during 30 minutes before ultraviolet-A irradiation

Sponsors

Dr. F.P. Fischer Stichting
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Stichting Nederlands Oogheelkundig Onderzoek
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Nienke Soeters
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented progressive KC (by Pentacam and/or corneal topography imaging). * A clear central cornea. * A minimal corneal thickness of ≥ 400 µm at the thinnest corneal location (Pentacam imaging). * Minimal Snellen corrected distance visual acuity of ≥ 0.4. * Patient age of ≥ 18 years. For this research study, the inclusion parameters will be the same as mentioned above, with the following additional inclusion criteria: * Documented progression of KC, as demonstrated by anterior segment imaging and/or corneal topography: o Defined an increase in maximal keratometry, steepest keratometry, mean keratometry or topographic cylinder value by ≥ 0.5 D over the previous 6 months and/or a decrease in thinnest pachymetry * Documented progression of KC defined by increase in refractive cylinder of ≥ 0.5 D over the previous 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of corneal scars. * History of epithelial healing problems. * Presence of previous ocular infection (such as herpes keratitis). * Patients who are pregnant and/or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical stabilisation of keratoconus one year after CXL1 yearUsing a Scheimpflug device (Pentacam, Oculus), topography measurements are performed. Clinical stabilisation is defined as an increase of no more than 1 diopter of the maximum keratometry value over the preoperative maximum keratometry value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications, defined as epithelial healing problems and/or keratitis.1 yearthe incidence of epithelial healing problems after treatment will be recorded

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026