Skip to content

Artemether-lumefantrine vs Chloroquine for Uncomplicated P. Vivax Malaria in Malaysia

Artemether-lumefantrine vs Chloroquine in Patients With Acute Non-severe P. Vivax Malaria in Sabah, Malaysia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02348788
Acronym
PRIMAL
Enrollment
98
Registered
2015-01-28
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2017-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plasmodium Vivax Malaria Without Complication

Keywords

Vivax, Malaria, artemether-lumefantrine, chloroquine, RCT

Brief summary

Both artemether-lumefantrine and chloroquine are currently used and recommended by Malaysian Ministry of Health as blood stage treatments for non-severe P. vivax and P. knowlesi malaria. Microscopic misdiagnosis between Plasmodium species remains a large issue in Sabah, Malaysia and elsewhere. In order to facilitate potential policy change to a unified ACT guideline for all malaria species in Sabah artemether-lumefantrine needs to be evaluated for P. vivax malaria. Preliminary data in a recently completed RCT evaluating artesunate-mefloquine vs chloroquine for P. vivax showed up to 36% P. vivax recurrence with chloroquine monotherapy by day 28 post treatment without primaquine. Based on these data blood stage chloroquine treatment failure rates should also be evaluated in the context of standard concurrent (rather than delayed) liver stage primaquine dosing, due to both its potential blood stage synergistic effect in addition to known decreased recurrence rates. As artemether-lumefantrine is one of the current first line Ministry of Health ACTs used in Sabah with a lower adverse event profile compared to artesunate-mefloquine, this was recommended as the more appropriate ACT to evaluate against chloroquine.

Detailed description

Malaria due to infection with P. vivax is currently estimated at up to 390 million episodes per year worldwide, with substantial morbidity caused by the recurrent nature of its infection, associated anaemia and adverse effects on pregnancy, and ability to cause severe disease and death. The majority of malaria cases from all Plasmodium species in Malaysia are from the Eastern state of Sabah, where despite around a 36-fold reduction in incidence since the implementation of malaria eradication programs in 1961, minimum estimates based on unpublished microscopy data from Sabah State public health records still detailed 8685 malaria cases in 2009-2011. While P. vivax accounts for between 30-50% of these figures currently, studies have demonstrated as overall transmission rates in countries previously endemic for malaria decline the proportion of cases attributable to P. vivax increases. Mixed P. falciparum / P. vivax infections are also likely to be underestimated in areas of co-endemicity, with high rates of recurrence of P. vivax shown in studies following treatment for apparent P. falciparum mono-infection or mixed Plasmodium spp. infections. Malaysian Ministry of Health guidelines currently recommends chloroquine and primaquine as first line treatment for the erythrocytic and hypnozoite life stages of uncomplicated P. vivax malaria respectively. While resistance to chloroquine has previously been documented in Sabah and also Peninsular Malaysia, the unstable transmission dynamics and recent reduction in P. vivax incidence due to public health measures mean the current risk of chloroquine-resistant P.vivax transmission is likely to be low. Despite this, due to documented increasing resistance in surrounding countries including Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and PNG, transient populations of migrant workers, and recent concerns of the failing efficacy of hypnozoite eradication by primaquine, the need for ongoing therapeutic efficacy monitoring is recommended. There is also growing support for artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) as a unified first line treatment choice in areas co-endemic for P. falciparum and P. vivax, as adopted by a small number of countries including PNG, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and Papua, Indonesia, due to the regional increase of chloroquine-resistant P. vivax, and ongoing concerns over the microscopic misdiagnosis of Plasmodium species. This is also particularly relevant for P. knowlesi malaria, as it is frequently misidentified on microscopy as P. falciparum and P. malariae due to morphological similarities in the early trophozoite, and late trophozoite and schizont life stages respectively, with studies showing up to 80% of P. malariae and 7-12% of P. falciparum in this region are actually P. knowlesi when definitively evaluated with PCR. Misdiagnosis has concerning treatment implications, as although P. knowlesi has been shown to respond well to ACT and chloroquine, unlike P. malariae, knowlesi malaria has a rapid 24-hour replication rate and can cause hyperparasitaemia, severe complications and fatal outcomes, while the inadvertent use of chloroquine for widely chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum may also have fatal consequences. Previous reluctance to use ACTs in presumed chloroquine-sensitive P.vivax areas were centered on concerns over efficacy and cost. The advent of generically produced ACTs is improving cost-related issues, while a recent Cochrane review of clinical trials looking at the use of ACT versus chloroquine for uncomplicated vivax malaria showed that ACTs are equivalent to chloroquine in preventing recurrent parasitaemia in the first 28 days (RR 1, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.39), and those with long half lives such as mefloquine or piperaquine are superior over a 6-8 week follow up, with fewer recurrent episodes after day 28 (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76). This post treatment prophylaxis benefit of longer acting agents extends to the reduction in gametocyte carriage, delay in relapse or re-infection and decreased risk of anaemia development, all of which contribute to decreased transmissibility and health care cost.

Interventions

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, Malaysia
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Menzies School of Health Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patients at least 1 year of age and weighing more than 10kg * Microscopic diagnosis of P. vivax monoinfection * Negative P. falciparum malaria rapid diagnostic test (histidine-rich-protein 2) * Fever (temperature ≥37.5°C) or history of fever in the last 48 hours * Written informed consent to participate in trial

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical or laboratory criteria for severe malaria, including warning signs, according to modified WHO 2010 criteria * Parasitaemia \> 100,000 /μL * Pregnancy or lactation * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to study drugs * Serious underlying disease (cardiac, renal or hepatic) * Received anti-malarials in previous 2 months * History of psychiatric illness, epilepsy, or cerebral malaria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parasite clearance at 48 hours48 hoursThe difference in proportion of patients with negative microscopy for P. vivax asexual parasites at 48 hours after treatment with A-L compared to CQ.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parasite clearance at day 1 and day 3At 24 and 72 hours post treatmentThe difference in proportion of patients with negative microscopy for P. vivax asexual parasites at 24 and 72 hours between treatment arms
Treatment outcomeDay 28 and 42 post treatmentEarly treatment failure (ETF), late treatment failure (LTF), and adequate parasitological and clinical response (APCR) at day 28 and day 42
Risk of anaemiaDay 28 post treatmentProportion with haemoglobin less than 12 g/dL in women or less than 13 g/dL in men between treatment arms
Fractional fall in haemoglobin at day 3Day 3 post treatmentDifference in fractional fall in haemoglobin concentration between treatment arms 3 days post treatment
Parasite clearance time in hoursWithin 72 hours post treatmentThe difference in absolute time in hours post treatment to microscopic parasite clearance between treatment arms
Risk of P. vivax gametocyte carriage during follow up42 daysThe difference in proportion of microscopic P. vivax gametocyte carriage between treatment arms during 42 day follow up
Risk of adverse events42 daysRisk of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) including relationship to study drugs throughout follow up
Length of hospital inpatient stayFrom 2-9 days post enrolmentNumber of days post enrolment requiring admission until treatment completed and 2 negative blood slides for malaria allowing discharge as per Malaysian Ministry of Health guidelines
Haemoglobin nadir42 days post treatmentDifference in risk of lowest recorded haemoglobin concentration between treatment arms during 42 day follow-up

Countries

Malaysia

Contacts

Primary ContactMatthew Grigg, MBBS
mat_grigg@hotmail.com+60149569476

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026