Skip to content

A Long-Term Safety Study of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in Subjects With Narcolepsy or OSA

A Long-Term Safety and Maintenance of Efficacy Study ofJZP-110 [(R)-2-amino-3 Phenylpropylcarbamate Hydrochloride] in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in Subjects With Narcolepsy or Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02348632
Enrollment
645
Registered
2015-01-28
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2019-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Narcolepsy, Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Brief summary

This is a Phase 3 study to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy of JZP-110 in subjects who have completed Study 14-002, 14-003, 14-004, 15-004, 15-005, ADX-N05 201, or ADX-N05 202.

Interventions

Sponsors

Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Major Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject meets one of the following: 1. Completed Study 14-002 or 14-003 (Group A) 2. Completed Study 14-004, 15-004, 15-005, ADX-N05 201 or ADX-N05 202 (Group B) 2. Body mass index from 18 to \<45 kg/m2 3. Consent to use a medically acceptable method of contraception 4. Willing and able to provide written informed consent Major

Exclusion criteria

1. Female subjects who are pregnant, nursing, or lactating 2. Any other clinically relevant medical, behavioral, or psychiatric disorder other than narcolepsy or OSA that is associated with excessive sleepiness 3. History or presence of bipolar disorder, bipolar related disorders, schizophrenia, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, or other psychotic disorders according to DSM-5 criteria 4. Presence of any acutely unstable medical condition, behavioral or psychiatric disorder (including active suicidal ideation), or surgical history that could affect the safety of the subject or interfere with study efficacy or safety assessments, or the ability of the subject to complete the trial per the judgment of the Investigator 5. History of bariatric surgery within the past year or a history of roux-en-y procedure 6. Presence or history of significant cardiovascular disease 7. Use of any over the counter (OTC) or prescription medications that could affect the evaluation of excessive sleepiness 8. Received an investigational drug other than JZP-110 in the past 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) 9. History of phenylketonuria (PKU) or history of hypersensitivity to phenylalanine-derived products

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreStart of randomized withdrawal phase to end of randomized withdrawal (2 weeks)Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline. A negative change from baseline represents improvement in excessive sleepiness. The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the analysis of ESS scores. This analysis included treatment group and randomization stratification factor (narcolepsy vs. OSA) as fixed effects. The ESS score at the beginning of the randomized withdrawal period was used as the covariate. The response variable was the change in ESS score from the beginning to the end of 2- week randomized withdrawal period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjects Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)Beginning of randomized withdrawal phase to end of the randomized withdrawal phase (2 weeks)Percentage of subjects reported as worse (minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse) on the PGIc during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline.
Subjects Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)Beginning of randomized withdrawal phase to end of the randomized withdrawal phase (2 weeks)Subjects reported as worse (very much worse, much worse, and minimally worse) on the CGIc during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline.

Countries

Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 645 subjects were enrolled in the study; 2 subjects withdrew from the study prior to receiving study drug. A total of 643 subjects received at least 1 dose of JZP-110 in the open-label phase and were included in the Safety Population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Open-label Period
643 subjects comprised the safety population.
643
Total643

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpen-label Period
Age, Continuous49.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.155
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
109 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
506 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
306 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
337 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 6430 / 142
other
Total, other adverse events
269 / 6433 / 142
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 6430 / 142

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score

Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline. A negative change from baseline represents improvement in excessive sleepiness. The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the analysis of ESS scores. This analysis included treatment group and randomization stratification factor (narcolepsy vs. OSA) as fixed effects. The ESS score at the beginning of the randomized withdrawal period was used as the covariate. The response variable was the change in ESS score from the beginning to the end of 2- week randomized withdrawal period.

Time frame: Start of randomized withdrawal phase to end of randomized withdrawal (2 weeks)

Population: 282 subjects were randomized into the randomized withdrawal period. Two subjects who were treated in the randomized withdrawal period did not have evaluable efficacy data during that period. Therefore, the mITT Population comprised 280 subjects, 141 who received placebo and 139 who received JZP-110.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
JZP-110Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score1.6 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
PlaceboChange in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score5.3 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Secondary

Subjects Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)

Subjects reported as worse (very much worse, much worse, and minimally worse) on the CGIc during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline.

Time frame: Beginning of randomized withdrawal phase to end of the randomized withdrawal phase (2 weeks)

Population: 282 subjects were randomized into the randomized withdrawal period. Two subjects who were treated in the randomized withdrawal period did not have evaluable efficacy data during that period. Therefore, the mITT Population comprised 280 subjects, 141 who received placebo and 139 who received JZP-110.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
JZP-110Subjects Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)28.7 percentage of subjects
PlaceboSubjects Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)63.8 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Subjects Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)

Percentage of subjects reported as worse (minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse) on the PGIc during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline.

Time frame: Beginning of randomized withdrawal phase to end of the randomized withdrawal phase (2 weeks)

Population: 282 subjects were randomized into the randomized withdrawal period. Two subjects who were treated in the randomized withdrawal period did not have evaluable efficacy data during that period. Therefore, the mITT Population comprised 280 subjects, 141 who received placebo and 139 who received JZP-110.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
JZP-110Subjects Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)28.2 percentage of subjects
PlaceboSubjects Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)64.5 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026