Skip to content

SGI-110 in Adults With Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Not Considered Candidates for Intensive Remission Induction

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Study of SGI-110 Versus Treatment Choice (TC) in Adults With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Who Are Not Considered Candidates for Intensive Remission Induction Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02348489
Enrollment
815
Registered
2015-01-28
Start date
2015-03-19
Completion date
2019-06-17
Last updated
2024-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Keywords

AML, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, SGI-110, DNA Hypomethylating Agen

Brief summary

To compare efficacy and safety between SGI-110 and Treatment Choice in adults with previously untreated AML who are not considered candidates for intensive remission induction chemotherapy.

Interventions

Investigational medicinal product

Choice of one: cytarabine, decitabine, or azacitidine

Sponsors

Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Cytologically or histologically confirmed diagnosis of AML (except M3 acute promyelocytic leukemia) according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Performance status (ECOG) of 0-3. Adults with previously untreated AML except for hydroxyurea or corticosteroids. Prior hydroxyurea or lenalidomide treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is allowed. Not considered candidates for intensive remission induction chemotherapy at time of enrollment based on EITHER: 1. ≥75 years of age OR 2. \<75 years of age with at least 1 of the following: i. Poor performance status (ECOG) score of 2-3. ii. Clinically significant heart or lung comorbidities, as reflected by at least 1 of: 1. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50%. 2. Lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≤65% of expected. 3. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤65% of expected. 4. Chronic stable angina or congestive heart failure controlled with medication. iii. Liver transaminases \>3 × upper limit of normal (ULN). iv. Other contraindication(s) to anthracycline therapy (must be documented). v. Other comorbidity the investigator judges incompatible with intensive remission induction chemotherapy, which must be documented and approved by the study medical monitor before randomization. Creatinine clearance as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) or other medically acceptable formulas ≥30 mL/min.

Exclusion criteria

Candidate for intensive remission induction chemotherapy at the time of enrollment. Candidate for best supportive care only, ie, not a candidate for any active therapy with the TC comparators. Known extramedullary central nervous system (CNS) AML. Second malignancy currently requiring active therapy except breast or prostate cancer stable on or responding to endocrine therapy. Prior treatment with decitabine or azacitidine. Hypersensitivity to decitabine, SGI-110, or SGI-110 excipients. Known active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Inactive hepatitis carrier status or low viral hepatitis titer on antivirals is allowed. Known significant mental illness or other condition such as active alcohol or other substance abuse or addiction that, in the opinion of the investigator, predisposes the subject to high risk of noncompliance with the protocol. Refractory congestive heart failure unresponsive to medical treatment; active infection resistant to all antibiotics; or advanced pulmonary disease requiring \>2 liters per minute (LPM) oxygen.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR)Up to 38 months (median follow-up of 25.5 months)Number of participants with a best response of CR assessed based on International Working Group 2003 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) response criteria by a blinded independent pathologist.
Overall SurvivalAt 676 death events (up to 38 months)Survival time was defined as the number of days from the day the participant was randomly assigned to study treatment to the date of death, regardless of cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Up to 38 months (median follow-up of 25.5 months)Progression-free survival was defined as the number of days from randomization to the earliest date of investigator's assessment of disease progression, participant receiving an alternative anti-leukemia therapy (including hematopoietic cell transplant), or relapse by peripheral blood (PB) assessment or blinded bone marrow (BM) assessment, whichever occurred first, or death, regardless of cause.
Number of Red Blood Cell or Platelet TransfusionsMonth 6The total number of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused or, separately, the total number of platelets transfused up to the 6-month time point for each participant was counted from the date of randomization to Day 180, the date of last contact, or date of death, whichever occurred earlier. One RBC or platelet transfusion was defined as one unit, and a single bag of RBCs or platelets was considered one unit.
Number of Participants With Composite CR (CRc)Up to 38 months (median follow-up of 25.5 months)CRc is reported as the number of participants with a best response of CR, complete response with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi).
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-VASBaseline to Month 6EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) descriptive scores were collected for each participant for a minimum of 6 months, unless the participant died or withdrew consent. A vertical 20-cm scale for EQ-VAS was used where the lowest value of 0 was labeled the worst health you can imagine and the top value of 100 was labeled the best health you can imagine. Mean change in scores from baseline are summarized.
Duration of CRUp to 38 months (median follow-up of 25.5 months)Duration of CR (in number of days) was calculated from the first time a CR was observed to the time of relapse, defined as the earliest time point whereby BM assessment or PB assessment indicated relapse/disease progression due to reappearance of leukemic blasts in PB or ≥ 5% leukemic blasts in BM.
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-5D-5LBaseline to Month 6EuroQol 5-level 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) descriptive scores were collected for each participant for a minimum of 6 months, unless the participant died or withdrew consent. Scores within each dimension for EQ-5D (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) were calculated using counts and proportions. Mean change in scores from baseline are summarized in which an index score of 0 represents the worst health state and 1 represents the best health state.
Number of Days Alive and Out of the HospitalMonth 6The date of each hospital admission and discharge was collected for each participant for up to 6 months, unless the participant died or withdrew consent prior to that time. Duration of each hospital stay in days was calculated as date of discharge minus date of admission. The Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital (NDAOH) was calculated as: NDAOH=180 - total duration of all hospital stays within 180 days from the first treatment - number of death days before Day 180. For subjects who were lost to follow-up within 6 months, the NDAOH was calculated conservatively assuming that the subject would have died the day after the last contact day.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 949 participants were assessed for inclusion in the study. Of these, 134 participants failed screening assessments and 815 participants were randomized.

Pre-assignment details

For the efficacy analysis (all randomized participants), the total duration was 38 months, with a median follow-up of 766 days (25.5 months), lower quartile follow-up of 671 days (22.4 months), and upper quartile follow-up of 896 days (29.9 months). For safety analysis (all treated participants), total duration was 51 months. Combining participants into a single group as part of the Treatment Choice arm was pre-specified as part of the study design.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)
Guadecitabine 60 mg/m\^2 was administered subcutaneously (SC) daily for 5 days (Days 1-5) in 28-day cycles.
408
Treatment Choice
One of the following treatment regimens was administered: 20 mg cytarabine subcutaneously (SC) BID on Days 1-10 every 28 days; 20 mg/m\^2 decitabine given as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion daily on Days 1-5 every 28 days; or 75 mg/m\^2 azacitidine given IV or SC daily on Days 1-7 every 28 days.
407
Total815

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath336335
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up35
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1427

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment ChoiceTotalSGI-110 (Guadecitabine)
Age, Continuous75.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
75.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
75.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants29 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
345 Participants710 Participants365 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
48 Participants76 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
74 Participants145 Participants71 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
35 Participants50 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
291 Participants602 Participants311 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
165 Participants342 Participants177 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
242 Participants473 Participants231 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
341 / 408344 / 407
other
Total, other adverse events
379 / 401371 / 392
serious
Total, serious adverse events
327 / 401297 / 392

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR)

Number of participants with a best response of CR assessed based on International Working Group 2003 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) response criteria by a blinded independent pathologist.

Time frame: Up to 38 months (median follow-up of 25.5 months)

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR)79 Participants
Treatment ChoiceNumber of Participants With a Complete Response (CR)71 Participants
Comparison: The complete response rate was compared between the treatment groups using a Cochran Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test at an alpha level of 0.04 stratified to adjust for stratification factors used at randomization: age (\<75 or \>=75), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0-1, 2-3), study center region (North American, Europe, Rest of World), and secondary AML (secondary to MDS or other antecedent hematologic disorder) or poor-risk cytogenetics (Yes, No/Unknown).p-value: 0.48296% CI: [-3.67, 7.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Overall Survival

Survival time was defined as the number of days from the day the participant was randomly assigned to study treatment to the date of death, regardless of cause.

Time frame: At 676 death events (up to 38 months)

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Overall Survival213 days
Treatment ChoiceOverall Survival254 days
Comparison: Overall survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the treatment groups using a 2-sided stratification log-rank test, stratified by the same factors used at randomization: age (\<75 or \>=75), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0-1, 2-3), study center region (North American, Europe, Rest of World), and secondary AML (secondary to MDS or other antecedent hematologic disorder) or poor-risk cytogenetics (Yes, No/Unknown).p-value: 0.732895% CI: [0.83, 1.14]Stratified log-rank
Secondary

Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L

EuroQol 5-level 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) descriptive scores were collected for each participant for a minimum of 6 months, unless the participant died or withdrew consent. Scores within each dimension for EQ-5D (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) were calculated using counts and proportions. Mean change in scores from baseline are summarized in which an index score of 0 represents the worst health state and 1 represents the best health state.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-5D-5LBaseline0.7767 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.216
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-5D-5LMonth 60.8252 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1825
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-5D-5LChange from Baseline-0.0023 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.183
Treatment ChoiceChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-5D-5LBaseline0.7663 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2291
Treatment ChoiceChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-5D-5LMonth 60.8240 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1948
Treatment ChoiceChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-5D-5LChange from Baseline0.0112 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2325
Secondary

Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-VAS

EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) descriptive scores were collected for each participant for a minimum of 6 months, unless the participant died or withdrew consent. A vertical 20-cm scale for EQ-VAS was used where the lowest value of 0 was labeled the worst health you can imagine and the top value of 100 was labeled the best health you can imagine. Mean change in scores from baseline are summarized.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-VASMonth 672.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.61
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-VASBaseline64.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.69
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-VASChange from Baseline3.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.35
Treatment ChoiceChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-VASBaseline63.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.05
Treatment ChoiceChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-VASMonth 671.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.88
Treatment ChoiceChange in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline: EQ-VASChange from Baseline3.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.16
Secondary

Duration of CR

Duration of CR (in number of days) was calculated from the first time a CR was observed to the time of relapse, defined as the earliest time point whereby BM assessment or PB assessment indicated relapse/disease progression due to reappearance of leukemic blasts in PB or ≥ 5% leukemic blasts in BM.

Time frame: Up to 38 months (median follow-up of 25.5 months)

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Duration of CR217 days
Treatment ChoiceDuration of CR231 days
Secondary

Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital

The date of each hospital admission and discharge was collected for each participant for up to 6 months, unless the participant died or withdrew consent prior to that time. Duration of each hospital stay in days was calculated as date of discharge minus date of admission. The Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital (NDAOH) was calculated as: NDAOH=180 - total duration of all hospital stays within 180 days from the first treatment - number of death days before Day 180. For subjects who were lost to follow-up within 6 months, the NDAOH was calculated conservatively assuming that the subject would have died the day after the last contact day.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital98.1 daysStandard Deviation 63.6
Treatment ChoiceNumber of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital105.7 daysStandard Deviation 63.58
Secondary

Number of Participants With Composite CR (CRc)

CRc is reported as the number of participants with a best response of CR, complete response with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi).

Time frame: Up to 38 months (median follow-up of 25.5 months)

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Number of Participants With Composite CR (CRc)93 Participants
Treatment ChoiceNumber of Participants With Composite CR (CRc)91 Participants
Secondary

Number of Red Blood Cell or Platelet Transfusions

The total number of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused or, separately, the total number of platelets transfused up to the 6-month time point for each participant was counted from the date of randomization to Day 180, the date of last contact, or date of death, whichever occurred earlier. One RBC or platelet transfusion was defined as one unit, and a single bag of RBCs or platelets was considered one unit.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Number of Red Blood Cell or Platelet TransfusionsRed Blood Cell Transfusions16.2 transfusion unitsStandard Deviation 11.84
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Number of Red Blood Cell or Platelet TransfusionsPlatelet Transfusions12.5 transfusion unitsStandard Deviation 18.78
Treatment ChoiceNumber of Red Blood Cell or Platelet TransfusionsRed Blood Cell Transfusions15.6 transfusion unitsStandard Deviation 13.02
Treatment ChoiceNumber of Red Blood Cell or Platelet TransfusionsPlatelet Transfusions14.4 transfusion unitsStandard Deviation 39.1
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the number of days from randomization to the earliest date of investigator's assessment of disease progression, participant receiving an alternative anti-leukemia therapy (including hematopoietic cell transplant), or relapse by peripheral blood (PB) assessment or blinded bone marrow (BM) assessment, whichever occurred first, or death, regardless of cause.

Time frame: Up to 38 months (median follow-up of 25.5 months)

Population: The efficacy analysis set includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SGI-110 (Guadecitabine)Progression-free Survival (PFS)159 days
Treatment ChoiceProgression-free Survival (PFS)166 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026