Skip to content

Feasibility Study of Adjuvant Treatment With S-1 and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Resectable Esophageal Cancer

Feasibility Study of Adjuvant Treatment With S-1 and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Resectable Esophageal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02347904
Acronym
SOX
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-01-28
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2019-11-30
Last updated
2019-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer

Keywords

Esophageal cancer, Adjuvant treatment, S-1, Oxaliplatin, Feasibility

Brief summary

In this prospective single arm study the investigators will assess the feasibility of S-1 and Oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of administering adjuvant S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) in patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin and esophagectomy. Primary end point is the percentage of patients completing the preplanned number of 6 cycles of SOX.

Detailed description

Since the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery is still poor, strategies to improve survival should be explored. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is unknown. Preferably, such adjuvant chemotherapy regimen should consist of a non-cross resistant, well-tolerated schedule. For this purpose, the combination of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, with oxaliplatin, may be of benefit, as each of these compounds have shown efficacy in gastroesophageal cancer. Also, importantly, the combination of S-1 with oxaliplatin (SOX) in advanced gastric cancer was well-tolerated. Nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that after major surgery for esophageal cancer, adjuvant treatment with combination chemotherapy may be hard to accomplish as was shown in the MAGIC trial for gastric cancer where less than half of all patients completed adjuvant therapy. Therefore the investigators want to assess the feasibility of an adjuvant treatment scheme with S-1 and Oxaliplatin. When the proposed treatment scheme is feasible the potential benefit on survival will be evaluated in further studies. Feasibility is defined ≥50% of patients completing the pre-planned number of cycles Study Objectives Primary Objective To assess the feasibility of administering adjuvant SOX in patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin and esophagectomy Secondary Objectives 1. Percentage of patients completing 6 cycles of S-1 (with or without oxaliplatin). 2. Dose modifications (ie, delays, dose reductions, or interruptions) for S-1. 3. Dose modifications (ie, delays, dose reductions, or interruptions) for oxaliplatin. 4. Dose intensity of S-1. 5. Dose intensity of oxaliplatin. 6. Toxicity. 7. Disease free survival. Exploratory Objectives 1. Assessment of pharmacokinetics of S1 as predictive factors for efficacy and toxicity. 2. Potential biomarker development based on assessment of archived tumor tissue and blood samples and the proposed mechanism of action of study drugs.

Interventions

Six courses of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) intravenously on day 1 and S-1 (25 mg/m2 b.i.d.) orally from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, starting within 12 weeks after esophagectomy

Sponsors

Celgene Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Radically resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagus * Completed neoadjuvant treatment with paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 and carboplatin Area Under Curve (AUC) = 2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29 and radiotherapy to a total dose of 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 fractions per week. * Age ≥ 18 years * WHO performance status 0-1 * Adequate bone marrow function (Hb ≥ 6.0 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0 x 109/L, - platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN and creatinine clearance, Cockroft formula, ≥30 ml/min), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x Upper Limit Normal (ULN), serum transaminases ≤ 3 x). * Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential. * Expected adequacy of follow-up. * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Any history or clinical signs of metastasis * History of a second malignancy \<5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma of cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of skin. * Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency or treatment within 4 weeks with DPD inhibitors, including sorivudine or its chemically related analogues such as brivudine. * Significant cardiovascular disease \< 1 yr before start of the study (symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia or infarction, unstable angina pectoris, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, arterial thrombosis, cerebrovascular event, pulmonary embolism). * Chronic active infection. * Any other concurrent severe or uncontrolled disease preventing the safe administration of study drugs. * Any impairment of gastrointestinal function or -disease that may significantly impair the absorption of oral drugs (i.e. uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea (defined as CTC grade 2 or higher), malabsorption syndrome, bowel obstruction, or inability to swallow tablets). * Concomitant treatments: concomitant (or within 4 weeks before start of the study) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation; concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy. * Continuous use of systemic immunosuppressive agents (except the use of corticosteroids as anti-emetic prophylaxis/treatment).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The percentage of patients completing the preplanned number of 6 cycles of SOX.24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients completing 6 cycles of S-1 (with or without oxaliplatin)24 months
Dose modifications for S-124 monthsin terms of delay of treatment in weeks
Dose modifications for Oxaliplatin24 monthsin terms of delay of treatment in weeks
Dose intensity for S-124 monthstotal received dose of S-1 in mg/m2 per week
Toxicity24 monthsin terms of CTCAE v4.0 criteria
Disease free survival24 monthsin months
Overall survival24 monthsin months
Dose intensity for Oxaliplatin24 monthstotal received dose of oxaliplatin in mg/m2 per week

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
AUC of S-124 monthsassessment of pharmacokinetics (Cmax/T1/2) in relation to toxicity in terms of CTCAE criteria and efficacy in terms of disease free survival

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026