Skip to content

Evaluate Effects of Personalized Patient Counselling for Enbrel® Therapy in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Multicenter, Historical Control Study to Evaluate the Effects of Personalized Patient Counselling on Persistence to Enbrel® Therapy in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (PerSuit)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02346877
Enrollment
19
Registered
2015-01-27
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2017-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistence to Enbrel

Keywords

Enbrel, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This study will evaluate whether the effect of personalized patient counselling tool, Information-Motivation-Strategy (IMS) based on the results of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) will improve persistence of Enbrel (etanercept) therapy at week 52 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis over the historical control as estimated by the standard of care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPersonalized Patient Counselling

In the interventional cohort participants enrolled on the study will receive personalized patient counselling using the IMS-model based on the baseline BMQ results through a patient assistance program for patients on Enbrel (Etanercept) therapy.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has provided informed consent prior to any study specific procedures * diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and eligible for treatment with Enbrel® (etanercept) * Subject has been prescribed and has access to commercial Enbrel® (etanercept) (50mg once weekly) according to the subject's health insurance * Completion of all required safety assessments before starting treatment with Enbrel® (etanercept) Other Inclusion Criteria May apply.

Exclusion criteria

* previously received treatment with a biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and/or Tofacitinib. * Malignancy (except nonmelanoma skin cancers, cervical or breast ductal carcinoma in situ) within the last 5 years * refusal to consent to enroll in the Enliven program * Currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending treatment on another investigational device or drug study(s) Other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Persistence of Study Drug Measured at 52 Weeks52 weeksA participant is persistent if the date of the last prescription filled plus the number of weeks supply of the prescription is greater than or equal to 52 weeks from enrolment and the eDiary confirms Enbrel® from the prescription was injected. A participant is not persistent if the last prescription filled plus the number of weeks supply of the prescription is less than 52 weeks from enrolment and the eDiary confirms there was no injection of Enbrel®, or, a participant is not persistent if the participant has a gap in treatment of more than 4 consecutive weeks for no medical reason at any time in the 52 week study period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to Study Drug up to 52 Weeks52 weeksA participant's adherence is determined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) of at least 80%. The MPR is the ratio of the total number of weeks' supply, based on pharmacy data, of Enbrel® divided by either 52 weeks or duration on study if a physician stops prescribing Enbrel® due to an adverse drug reaction or lack of efficacy.
Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ)52 weeksBMQ consists of two five-item scales assessing patients' beliefs about the necessity of Enbrel® for controlling their rheumatoid arthritis and their concerns about potential adverse consequences of taking Enbrel®. Using a five-point Likert scale, on each of necessity and concerns, the individual items within both scales are summed. The total scores for the Necessity and Concerns Scales range from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was initiated at 15 centers in Canada, of which 8 centers enrolled participants. The first participant was enrolled on 14 April 2015 and the last participant enrolled on 13 October 2015.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were to be enrolled in the standard of care (control) cohort and complete the 52-week study period. Data from 75% of the group were to be analyzed before enrolling participants in the interventional cohort. As the study was prematurely closed due to slow enrollment, the interventional cohort was not enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care (Control) Cohort
The first 100 participants were to be enrolled in the standard of care cohort. These participants received treatment with Enbrel® (etanercept) in routine clinical practice and were to complete a 52 week study period as per the investigator's standard of care.
19
Personalized Patient Counselling (Interventional) Cohort
Participants enrolled in the interventional cohort were to receive Enbrel® (etanercept) therapy and personalized patient counselling using the Information-Motivation-Strategy (IMS) model based on Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) results through a patient assistance program for patients on Enbrel (etanercept) therapy.
0
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative Decision10
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyMissing50
Overall StudySponsor Decision120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard of Care (Control) CohortTotal
Age, Continuous57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 190 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Persistence of Study Drug Measured at 52 Weeks

A participant is persistent if the date of the last prescription filled plus the number of weeks supply of the prescription is greater than or equal to 52 weeks from enrolment and the eDiary confirms Enbrel® from the prescription was injected. A participant is not persistent if the last prescription filled plus the number of weeks supply of the prescription is less than 52 weeks from enrolment and the eDiary confirms there was no injection of Enbrel®, or, a participant is not persistent if the participant has a gap in treatment of more than 4 consecutive weeks for no medical reason at any time in the 52 week study period.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Efficacy endpoints were not evaluated because the study was prematurely closed and no participants completed the study.

Secondary

Adherence to Study Drug up to 52 Weeks

A participant's adherence is determined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) of at least 80%. The MPR is the ratio of the total number of weeks' supply, based on pharmacy data, of Enbrel® divided by either 52 weeks or duration on study if a physician stops prescribing Enbrel® due to an adverse drug reaction or lack of efficacy.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Efficacy endpoints were not evaluated because the study was prematurely closed and no participants completed the study.

Secondary

Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ)

BMQ consists of two five-item scales assessing patients' beliefs about the necessity of Enbrel® for controlling their rheumatoid arthritis and their concerns about potential adverse consequences of taking Enbrel®. Using a five-point Likert scale, on each of necessity and concerns, the individual items within both scales are summed. The total scores for the Necessity and Concerns Scales range from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate stronger beliefs.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Efficacy endpoints were not evaluated because the study was prematurely closed and no participants completed the study.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026