Skip to content

Cognitive Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease

Cortical Physiology as a Therapeutic Target in Parkinson's Disease Related Dementia and Cognitive Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02346708
Enrollment
49
Registered
2015-01-27
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Parkinson's, TMS, Kluger

Brief summary

This study plans to learn more about the brain function related to thinking problems in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

Detailed description

Dementia is the leading cause of nursing home placement in Parkinson's disease (PD) yet little is known about the cause(s) of cognitive dysfunction in PD and there are no effective treatments. The investigators preliminary data and other published studies suggest that abnormalities in brain activity involving networks important for normal thinking and memory may contribute to cognitive dysfunction in PD and may represent a target for treatment. This proposal will identify abnormalities in cortical activity related to cognitive dysfunction in PD using magnetoencephalography and will perform a randomized control trial of bifrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to determine the therapeutic potential of modulating this brain activity.

Interventions

DEVICEReal TMS

real treatment

DEVICESham TMS

placebo treatment

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of probable PD (using United Kingdom Brain Bank criteria) * Diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment * No unstable medical condition

Exclusion criteria

* Features suggestive of other causes of Parkinsonism or other neurological disorders * Prior deep brain stimulation (DBS) or ablation surgery * Evidence for active depression or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score greater than or equal to 11 * Motor symptoms expected to interfere with scanning (e.g. sever tremor) * Contraindications to TMS, MEG, or MRI such as pregnancy, pacemaker, unstable cardiac disease, skull lesion, claustrophobia, history of epilepsy, or on medications known to lower seizure threshold * Implanted electronic devices or metal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Connectivity Measures2 weeksOur MEG outcome will be a change in small-worldness, global efficiency, nodal efficiency and degree distribution pre-TMS to immediately post-TMS treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive Scores2 weeksOur behavioral outcome will be a change in the scores of the following tests: Mattis Dementia Rating Scale: Higher raw scores = better cognitive status, ranging from 0 to 144. Normative data in healthy subjects range from 137 to 144. Trail Making Test Trails B: average score is 75 seconds; deficient score is \> 273 seconds. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) - Verbal Fluency Test. Higher score = higher ability in language processing. Scales scores vary from 0 min to N/A max (no concrete maximum). DKEFS - Stroop Interference Test measures inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. Performance is measured by completion time. No min or max value for this test. Test should be discontinued after 90 sec. For those, higher scores = higher abilities: California Verbal Learning Test (declarative memory, scale 0 to 80), Boston Naming Test (language, scale 0 to 60), Brief Test of Attention and Judgment of Line Orientation (scale 0 to 30)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was conducted in the United States at one site: University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus. The first participant was enrolled in May 19, 2014.

Pre-assignment details

70 participants were assessed for eligibility (following Inclusion and exclusion criteria), 21 were screen failures, 49 participants were randomized to treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Real TMS
TMS will be administered using a 70-mm diameter air-cooled figure-of-8 coil and SuperRapid2 Magstim Stimulator. Repetitive pulses will be delivered to the right and left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex (Brodmann area 46) using a frameless stereotactic navigation system and the subject's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Brainsight software. Stimuli will be delivered at 20 Hz at 90% resting motor threshold (rMT) for 25 trains of 30 pulses per train, inter-train interval of 30 seconds for a total of 750 pulses per hemisphere. Stimulation will be delivered for 10 consecutive days, excluding the weekends. This dose and duration of repetitive TMS (rTMS) is based on physiological studies of healthy adults and treatment studies of cognition in PD and Alzheimer's disease. Side of first stimulation (left vs right hemisphere) will be counterbalanced across subjects. Real TMS: real treatment
22
Sham TMS
Sham stimulation will be delivered using a sham coil fitted with electrodes to mimic both the auditory and somatic sensation of real TMS. Sham TMS: placebo treatment
24
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham TMSTotalReal TMS
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
17 Participants31 Participants14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous69.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
67.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants44 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants46 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants13 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants33 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 221 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 220 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Connectivity Measures

Our MEG outcome will be a change in small-worldness, global efficiency, nodal efficiency and degree distribution pre-TMS to immediately post-TMS treatment.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: No data displayed because Outcome Measure has zero total analyzed. No participants were analyzed for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Post-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive Scores

Our behavioral outcome will be a change in the scores of the following tests: Mattis Dementia Rating Scale: Higher raw scores = better cognitive status, ranging from 0 to 144. Normative data in healthy subjects range from 137 to 144. Trail Making Test Trails B: average score is 75 seconds; deficient score is \> 273 seconds. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) - Verbal Fluency Test. Higher score = higher ability in language processing. Scales scores vary from 0 min to N/A max (no concrete maximum). DKEFS - Stroop Interference Test measures inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. Performance is measured by completion time. No min or max value for this test. Test should be discontinued after 90 sec. For those, higher scores = higher abilities: California Verbal Learning Test (declarative memory, scale 0 to 80), Boston Naming Test (language, scale 0 to 60), Brief Test of Attention and Judgment of Line Orientation (scale 0 to 30)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) at 2 weeks minus score on the MDRS at baseline-1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.55
Real TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Verbal fluency at 2 weeks minus score on the Verbal fluency at baseline0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.35
Real TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Stroop Interference at 2 weeks minus score on the Stroop Interference at baseline-9.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.55
Real TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Brief Test of Attention (BTA) at 2 weeks minus score on the BTA at baseline-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Real TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Boston Naming Test (BNT) at 2 weeks minus score on the BNT at baseline0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.95
Real TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Judgment of Line Orientation (JLO) at 2 weeks minus score on the JLO at baseline0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Sham TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Boston Naming Test (BNT) at 2 weeks minus score on the BNT at baseline1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Sham TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) at 2 weeks minus score on the MDRS at baseline0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.55
Sham TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Brief Test of Attention (BTA) at 2 weeks minus score on the BTA at baseline0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.15
Sham TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Verbal fluency at 2 weeks minus score on the Verbal fluency at baseline1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
Sham TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Judgment of Line Orientation (JLO) at 2 weeks minus score on the JLO at baseline1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Sham TMSPost-TMS Change From Baseline in Cognitive ScoresScore on the Stroop Interference at 2 weeks minus score on the Stroop Interference at baseline-2.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.85
Comparison: We estimated a sample size of 20 per group would provide at least 80% power at a significance level of 0.05 to detect a between-group difference of 10 on the Matthis Dementia Rating Scale-2, an effect size similar to prior studies of rivastigmine.p-value: 0.195% CI: [-4.56, 0.42]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026