Skip to content

A Hemodynamic Comparison of Stationary and Portable Pneumatic Compression Devices

A Hemodynamic Comparison of Stationary and Portable Pneumatic Compression Devices

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02345642
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-01-26
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2017-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Hip Arthroplasty

Brief summary

We are comparing two pneumatic compression devices, VenaFlow (stationary) and MCS (portable) in both the supine an standing position. We will start supine and will take 3 baseline measurements of venous velocity and then apply a device and take 3 measurements of the increase in peak venous velocity. We will repeat this with the second device. We will then have the subject stand and repeat the above with each device. We will randomize the order of the devices in the supine and standing position. This study will involve 10 healthy subjects of various ages and 10 total hip replacements (THR) patients.

Interventions

DEVICEActiveCare+SFT Supine
DEVICEVenaFlow Elite Supine
DEVICEActiveCare+SFT Standing
DEVICEVenaFlow Elite Standing

Sponsors

DJO Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Phase one: 10 healthy test subjects will be included of various ages. They will have each pneumatic compression device applied in the supine and then standing positions. Phase two: 10 patients following THR on postoperative day #2 will be included. These patients will agree to participate in the study and have to be able to stand for approximately 10 minutes.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with lymphedema * Patients with peripheral vascular disease (chronic venous insufficiency) * Patients who do not wish to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak Venous VelocityChange from Baseline in Peak Venous Velocity 30 minutes after Device is AppliedUltrasound of the venous system just below the saphenofemoral junction to assess the venous velocity will be taken before and after application the VenaFlow and the ActiveCare+S.F.T pneumatic compression devices. Change from Baseline in Peak Venous Velocity 30 minutes after Device is applied is recorded.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
10 Healthy Patients Without THA
The 10 test subjects of this study arm will be healthy volunteers of various ages that are willing to have the efficacy of pneumatic compression tested on them. ActiveCare+SFT Supine VenaFlow Elite Supine ActiveCare+SFT Standing VenaFlow Elite Standing
10
10 Patients With THA on Post-Op Day 2
The 10 test subjects of this study arm will be primary THR patients of Dr. Westrich that have undergone uncomplicated THR surgery in which they are allowed to be full weight bearing by or before post-op day 2. ActiveCare+SFT Supine VenaFlow Elite Supine ActiveCare+SFT Standing VenaFlow Elite Standing
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic10 Patients With THA on Post-Op Day 210 Healthy Patients Without THATotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants10 Participants15 Participants
Age, Continuous64.6 years28.7 years46.65 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Peak Venous Velocity

Ultrasound of the venous system just below the saphenofemoral junction to assess the venous velocity will be taken before and after application the VenaFlow and the ActiveCare+S.F.T pneumatic compression devices. Change from Baseline in Peak Venous Velocity 30 minutes after Device is applied is recorded.

Time frame: Change from Baseline in Peak Venous Velocity 30 minutes after Device is Applied

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
10 Healthy Patients Without THAPeak Venous Velocitydelta PVV from before to after Activecare (supine)40.5 cm/s
10 Healthy Patients Without THAPeak Venous VelocityDelta PVV from before to after Venaflow (Supine)87.1 cm/s
10 Healthy Patients Without THAPeak Venous VelocityDelta PVV from before to after Venaflow (Standing)127.9 cm/s
10 Healthy Patients Without THAPeak Venous Velocitydelta PVV from before to after Activeca (Standing)32.6 cm/s
10 Patients With THA on Post-Op Day 2Peak Venous VelocityDelta PVV from before to after Venaflow (Standing)155.7 cm/s
10 Patients With THA on Post-Op Day 2Peak Venous Velocitydelta PVV from before to after Activecare (supine)37.8 cm/s
10 Patients With THA on Post-Op Day 2Peak Venous Velocitydelta PVV from before to after Activeca (Standing)41.9 cm/s
10 Patients With THA on Post-Op Day 2Peak Venous VelocityDelta PVV from before to after Venaflow (Supine)86.8 cm/s

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026