Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Efficacy of LAI When Added to Multi-drug Regimen Compared to Multi-drug Regimen Alone

A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study of Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) in Adult Patients With Nontuberculous Mycobacterial (NTM) Lung Infection Caused by Mycobacterium Avium Complex (MAC) That Are Refractory to Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02344004
Acronym
CONVERT
Enrollment
336
Registered
2015-01-22
Start date
2015-05-27
Completion date
2019-04-03
Last updated
2020-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous

Keywords

ALIS, ARIKAYCE

Brief summary

A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) 590 mg administered once daily (QD) when added to multi-drug regimen (MDR) in participants with Nontuberculous Mycobacterial (NTM) lung infection caused by Mycobacterium Avium Complex (MAC) that were refractory to treatment. Participants were randomized 2:1 to LAI 590 mg administered QD + MDR or MDR alone.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of LAI in adult participants with NTM lung infections caused by MAC that were refractory to treatment. Participants received either LAI 590 mg administered QD by inhalation plus a multidrug regimen, hereafter referred to as LAI + MDR or a multidrug regimen alone, hereafter referred to as MDR alone for a minimum of 8 months. Participants who demonstrated culture conversion by Month 6 went on to complete a treatment course of 12 months, starting from the first of 3 negative cultures that defined culture conversion. Sputum culture results were made available to the site after the Month 6 sputum result was known, in time for the Month 8 visit. Prior to the Month 8 visit, the culture results from Baseline to Month 6 inclusively were blinded to the site and Sponsor. The results were blinded to reduce the potential for bias in an open-label study. At Month 8 (-28 to +7 days), after all sputum culture results were made available to the site only, up to and including Month 6, participants were assessed as converters or non-converters. A converter was defined as a participant who had 3 consecutive monthly MAC-negative sputum cultures at any time within the first 6 months of the study. Relapse or recurrence was defined as having MAC-positive sputum cultures in liquid broth media (agar negative) for 3 or more consecutive months, or having at least 1 MAC-positive sputum culture on solid media (agar positive) after achieving culture conversion. A non-converter was defined as a participant who did not have 3 consecutive monthly MAC-negative sputum cultures at any time within the first 6 months of the study. All converters remained in the study. Converters who, after culture conversion, subsequently had MAC-positive sputum cultures in liquid broth media (agar negative) for 1 or 2 consecutive months only by Month 6 also remained in the study. Participants who remained in the study continued their randomized treatment regimen until they completed a total of 12 months of treatment (EOT), starting from the first of 3 negative cultures that defined culture conversion. These participants returned after the EOT visit for 28 days, 3, 6, and 12 months off-treatment follow-up visits. The 12 months off-treatment follow-up visit was the end of study (EOS) visit. No NTM treatment was administered during the off-treatment phase. At Month 8, all non-converters as assessed at the Month 6 visit were discontinued from Study INS-212. Participants who experienced a relapse or recurrence by Month 6 also discontinued from Study INS-212 at their Month 8 visit. These participants were potentially eligible to enter a separate open-label study of LAI (Study INS-312), provided all entry criteria were met for that study.

Interventions

DRUGLAI (Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation) 590 mg

LAI 590 mg QD, administered by inhaling drug product that had been aerosolized in an eFlow nebulizer over approximately 14 minutes.

Sponsors

Insmed Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Be continually positive for MAC on sputum culture while adhering to a multi-drug treatment regimen for a minimum duration of 6 months which is either ongoing or was completed no more than 12 months before screening 2. Be diagnosed with MAC NTM lung infection with evidence of nodular bronchiectasis and/or fibrocavitary disease by chest CT 3. Be willing to adhere to multi-drug treatment regimen during the course of the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with cystic fibrosis 2. Positive pregnancy test or lactation at screening. All women of child bearing potential will be tested. Women not of childbearing potential are defined as postmenopausal (i.e., amenorrheic for at least 1 year), or surgically or naturally sterile. 3. Active pulmonary tuberculosis requiring treatment at screening 4. History of lung transplantation 5. Prior exposure to LAI (including clinical study).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armby Month 6Sputum specimens were collected at Screening (Visit 1), Baseline (Visit 2), and at Visits 3 (Month 1) through 8 (Month 6). A negative culture result reflected a negative culture result for all sputum samples collected at each visit. Participants met the primary endpoint of culture conversion by Month 6 if they had 3 consecutive monthly MAC-negative sputum cultures during the first 6 months of the study. A participant needed to achieve the first of 3 consecutive negative sputum cultures (that defined culture conversion) by Month 4 in order to meet the primary endpoint by Month 6. Each participant in the intent to treat (ITT) population (ie, all randomized participants) was classified as either a converter or non-converter by Month 6.
Number of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm Aloneup to Month 19Sputum specimens were collected at screening, baseline (Day 1), during treatment, and at Months 1, 3, 6, and 12 months off treatment. Culture conversion with durability was defined as achieving culture conversion by Month 6 and then having no more than 2 consecutive broth positive cultures and no Agar positive culture up to 3 months off treatment. Converters with missing broth or Agar sputum culture result after Month 6 up to 3 months off treatment were considered as not achieving culture conversion with durability except those participants who are unable to produce sputum despite reasonable efforts, as reported by source documentation. Participants who had relapse/recurrence, had rescue medication and/or died before reaching 3 months off treatment were considered as not achieving culture conversion with durability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving Sustained Culture Conversion at the End of Treatment (EOT) in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm Aloneup to Month 16Sustained conversion was evaluated in participants who completed at least 12 months of treatment from the start of culture conversion. Sustained conversion was defined as conversion (3 consecutive negative monthly sputum samples) by Month 6 with no positive agar media culture or no more than 2 broth media cultures up to and including the time point. Participants who did not convert were considered non-sustained conversions.
Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armat Month 6A 6-minute walk assessment of exertional capability was performed at Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6. The standardized protocol based on the ATS guidelines was used. The 6MWT was conducted by a site member who was blinded to the participant's open-label treatment assignment. The analysis of the change from Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the 6MWT distance was performed after the last participant completed Month 6 and his/her 6MWT distance data were available.
Change From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Scoreat Month 6The SGRQ was completed before administration of study drug at Baseline (Day 1) and Months 3, 6, 8, and 12, and at the EOT visit and the 3 months off treatment visit. The SGRQ is a self-administered questionnaire that has been validated in participants with airways disease, specifically in participants with bronchiectasis. The SGRQ assesses health-related quality of life in participants with chronic pulmonary disease by evaluating 3 health domains: symptoms (distress caused by respiratory symptoms); activity (effects of disturbances on mobility and physical activity); and impacts (the effect of disease on factors such as employment, personal control of one's health, and need for medication). A composite total score is derived as the sum of domain scores for symptoms, activity, and impact (0 = best possible score and 100 = worst possible score). A within patient reduction from baseline in score of 4 units is generally recognized as a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life.
Change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance at EOT in the LAI Arm Compared to a Multi-drug Regimen Aloneup to Month 16A 6-minute walk assessment of exertional capability was performed at Baseline (Day 1) and up to EOT or Month 16. The standardized protocol based on the ATS guidelines was used. The 6MWT was conducted by a site member who was blinded to the participant's open-label treatment assignment.
Time to Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armby Month 6The time to culture conversion was defined by the date of the first of at least 3 consecutive monthly culture specimens that were Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC)-negative. The 25th percentile time to conversion is the estimated time taken for 25% of participants to convert. The 50th percentile time to conversion is the estimated time taken for 50% of participants to convert.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 127 sites in 18 countries.

Pre-assignment details

Participant flow table reflects the disposition through end of the study (Month 28). The deaths under Reasons for Discontinuation reflect the primary reason (according to investigator's judgment) that the participant discontinued and does not represent all deaths in the trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LAI + Multi-drug Regimen
Participants received LAI 590 mg QD in addition to their already prescribed anti-mycobacterial regimen (based on the 2007 ATS/IDSA Guidelines); LAI 590 mg QD, administered by inhaling drug product that had been aerosolized in an eFlow nebulizer over approximately 14 minutes
224
Multi-drug Regimen
Participants received their already prescribed anti-mycobacterial regimen (based on the 2007 ATS/IDSA Guidelines)
112
Total336

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event111
Overall StudyDeath97
Overall StudyOther Not Specified120
Overall StudyPhysician Decision41
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyRescue Medication20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject225

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalMulti-drug RegimenLAI + Multi-drug Regimen
Age, Continuous64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.77
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.16
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.59
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
313 Participants102 Participants211 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
If female, is participant of childbearing potential?
No
214 Participants62 Participants152 Participants
If female, is participant of childbearing potential?
Yes
19 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
If not childbearing potential, specify
Naturally Sterile
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
If not childbearing potential, specify
Postmenopausal
164 Participants50 Participants114 Participants
If not childbearing potential, specify
Surgically Sterile
50 Participants12 Participants38 Participants
Multidrug regimen prior to enrollment
Off treatment for at least 3 months
34 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Multidrug regimen prior to enrollment
On treatment
302 Participants101 Participants201 Participants
Prior nebulized IV amikacin39 Participants15 Participants24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
83 Participants25 Participants58 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
235 Participants77 Participants158 Participants
Region
Asia (excluding Japan)
20 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Region
Japan
48 Participants14 Participants34 Participants
Region
North America
159 Participants55 Participants104 Participants
Region
Rest of World
109 Participants37 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
233 Participants68 Participants165 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
103 Participants44 Participants59 Participants
Smoking status (includes e-cigarettes)
Current smoker
36 Participants10 Participants26 Participants
Smoking status (includes e-cigarettes)
Not a current smoker
300 Participants102 Participants198 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
11 / 2238 / 112
other
Total, other adverse events
199 / 22372 / 112
serious
Total, serious adverse events
45 / 22323 / 112

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Arm

Sputum specimens were collected at Screening (Visit 1), Baseline (Visit 2), and at Visits 3 (Month 1) through 8 (Month 6). A negative culture result reflected a negative culture result for all sputum samples collected at each visit. Participants met the primary endpoint of culture conversion by Month 6 if they had 3 consecutive monthly MAC-negative sputum cultures during the first 6 months of the study. A participant needed to achieve the first of 3 consecutive negative sputum cultures (that defined culture conversion) by Month 4 in order to meet the primary endpoint by Month 6. Each participant in the intent to treat (ITT) population (ie, all randomized participants) was classified as either a converter or non-converter by Month 6.

Time frame: by Month 6

Population: The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmConverter65 Participants
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmNon-Converter159 Participants
Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmConverter10 Participants
Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmNon-Converter102 Participants
Comparison: The proportion of participants achieving culture conversion by Month 6 was analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by smoking status and prior multi-drug regimen. The treatment comparison was tested at two-sided significance level of 0.05. The null hypothesis assumed that culture conversion by Month 6 is independent of treatment, and the alternative hypothesis assumed that culture conversion by Month 6 is associated with treatment.p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Number of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm Alone

Sputum specimens were collected at screening, baseline (Day 1), during treatment, and at Months 1, 3, 6, and 12 months off treatment. Culture conversion with durability was defined as achieving culture conversion by Month 6 and then having no more than 2 consecutive broth positive cultures and no Agar positive culture up to 3 months off treatment. Converters with missing broth or Agar sputum culture result after Month 6 up to 3 months off treatment were considered as not achieving culture conversion with durability except those participants who are unable to produce sputum despite reasonable efforts, as reported by source documentation. Participants who had relapse/recurrence, had rescue medication and/or died before reaching 3 months off treatment were considered as not achieving culture conversion with durability.

Time frame: up to Month 19

Population: The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneDurable Conversion36 Participants
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneNon-Durable Conversion188 Participants
Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneDurable Conversion0 Participants
Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneNon-Durable Conversion112 Participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score

The SGRQ was completed before administration of study drug at Baseline (Day 1) and Months 3, 6, 8, and 12, and at the EOT visit and the 3 months off treatment visit. The SGRQ is a self-administered questionnaire that has been validated in participants with airways disease, specifically in participants with bronchiectasis. The SGRQ assesses health-related quality of life in participants with chronic pulmonary disease by evaluating 3 health domains: symptoms (distress caused by respiratory symptoms); activity (effects of disturbances on mobility and physical activity); and impacts (the effect of disease on factors such as employment, personal control of one's health, and need for medication). A composite total score is derived as the sum of domain scores for symptoms, activity, and impact (0 = best possible score and 100 = worst possible score). A within patient reduction from baseline in score of 4 units is generally recognized as a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: at Month 6

Population: The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreSGRQ Total Score at Baseline:36.555 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3777
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreSGRQ Total Score at Month 6:38.715 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3559
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreChange from Baseline to Month 6:2.009 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4128
Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreChange from Baseline to Month 6:-1.312 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6216
Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreSGRQ Total Score at Baseline:38.409 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5753
Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreSGRQ Total Score at Month 6:37.368 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6868
Secondary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Arm

A 6-minute walk assessment of exertional capability was performed at Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6. The standardized protocol based on the ATS guidelines was used. The 6MWT was conducted by a site member who was blinded to the participant's open-label treatment assignment. The analysis of the change from Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the 6MWT distance was performed after the last participant completed Month 6 and his/her 6MWT distance data were available.

Time frame: at Month 6

Population: The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmBaseline424.2 metersStandard Deviation 1.12
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmMonth 6420.6 metersStandard Deviation 4.73
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmChange from Baseline to Month 6-3.6 metersStandard Deviation 3.25
Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmBaseline420.9 metersStandard Deviation 0.48
Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmMonth 6420.3 metersStandard Deviation 2.57
Multi-drug RegimenChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmChange from Baseline to Month 6-0.5 metersStandard Deviation 4.2
Comparison: This was analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of change from Baseline at Months 4\&6. MMRM included treatment, month, treatment-by-month interaction, combination of smoking status \& prior MDR (4 levels: Yes/Yes, Yes/No, No/Yes, and No/No) as fixed factors, baseline 6MWD as a covariate \& baseline 6MWD-by-month interaction. An unstructured covariance matrix was used for the MMRM.p-value: 0.7804Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM)
Secondary

Change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance at EOT in the LAI Arm Compared to a Multi-drug Regimen Alone

A 6-minute walk assessment of exertional capability was performed at Baseline (Day 1) and up to EOT or Month 16. The standardized protocol based on the ATS guidelines was used. The 6MWT was conducted by a site member who was blinded to the participant's open-label treatment assignment.

Time frame: up to Month 16

Population: Due to the widely varying timepoints that makeup the EOT visit, this was not considered an appropriate analysis and was not performed.

Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving Sustained Culture Conversion at the End of Treatment (EOT) in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm Alone

Sustained conversion was evaluated in participants who completed at least 12 months of treatment from the start of culture conversion. Sustained conversion was defined as conversion (3 consecutive negative monthly sputum samples) by Month 6 with no positive agar media culture or no more than 2 broth media cultures up to and including the time point. Participants who did not convert were considered non-sustained conversions.

Time frame: up to Month 16

Population: The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Sustained Culture Conversion at the End of Treatment (EOT) in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneSustained Conversion41 Participants
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Sustained Culture Conversion at the End of Treatment (EOT) in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneNon-Sustained Conversion183 Participants
Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Sustained Culture Conversion at the End of Treatment (EOT) in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneSustained Conversion3 Participants
Multi-drug RegimenNumber of Participants Achieving Sustained Culture Conversion at the End of Treatment (EOT) in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneNon-Sustained Conversion109 Participants
Secondary

Time to Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Arm

The time to culture conversion was defined by the date of the first of at least 3 consecutive monthly culture specimens that were Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC)-negative. The 25th percentile time to conversion is the estimated time taken for 25% of participants to convert. The 50th percentile time to conversion is the estimated time taken for 50% of participants to convert.

Time frame: by Month 6

Population: There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenTime to Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Arm25th Percentile2.13 months
LAI + Multi-drug RegimenTime to Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Arm50th PercentileNA months
Multi-drug RegimenTime to Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Arm25th PercentileNA months
Multi-drug RegimenTime to Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Arm50th PercentileNA months
Comparison: Kaplan Meier estimates for the distribution of time to culture conversion were constructed for treatment arms. The treatment comparison was made using the stratified log rank test for the ITT population. The estimated median time to culture conversion for each treatment arm was not estimable. The time to culture conversion was analyzed using Cox regression model to estimate hazards ratio.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.01, 7.63]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026