Skip to content

Is the Efficacy of Epidural Steroid Injections Related to the Different Volume Injections?

Is the Efficacy of Epidural Steroid Injections Related to the Different Volume Injections? :A Randomised, Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02343432
Enrollment
75
Registered
2015-01-22
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2015-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Anesthesia, Adverse Effect, Spinal, Epidural

Brief summary

This study was aimed to investigate the impact of using different epidural volumes. Patients with acute discogenic pain were included in the study.

Detailed description

Objectives: This study was aimed to investigate the impact of using different epidural volumes. Methods: Seventy five patients with acute discogenic pain were included in the study.The patients were randomly assigned to three groups. All patients received a single epidural dose of triamcinolone \[80 mg\] and 12.5 mg bupivacaine combination. The patients in Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 received a volume of 10 mL, 15 mL, and 20 mL by epidural injections, respectively. The efficacy of treatment was assessed with VAS (visual analog scale) \[O= no pain, 10 = unbearable pain\], SLET(straight leg elevation test) \[0° = worst, 85° = best\], and Oswestry Disability Index; ODI \[0% to 20%:minimal disability , 80% to 100%:bed bound patients\] before and 2 weeks after the EPSI.

Interventions

DRUGTriamcinolone

Triamcinolone

DRUGEpidural Volume

Epidural Volume

DRUGBupivacaine

Bupivacaine

Sponsors

University of Gaziantep
CollaboratorOTHER
Neslihan Uztüre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* acute discogenic pain with less than three months duration not responding to other modalities of conservative management \[NSAIDs, physiotherapy, bracing, etc.\], * radiological disc bulging accompanying unilateral root impingement symptoms, * an Oswestry daily activity score more than 20 percent, and * resistance to treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with bilateral root impingement symptoms, neurological deficits, and/or history of previous lumbar disc surgery, severe cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal diseases, glaucoma, urinary retention, and/or known allergy to the drugs used in the study were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS (visual analog scale) [O= no pain, 10 = unbearable pain]2 weeks
SLET(straight leg elevation test) [0° = worst, 85° = best]2 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index; ODI [0% to 20%:minimal disability , 80% to 100%:bed bound patients]2 weeks

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026