Skip to content

Nerve Ablation by Cooled Radiofrequency Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Management of Knee Pain

A Prospective, Multi-Center, RCT Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Coolief™ Cooled Radiofrequency Probe to Create Lesions of the Genicular Nerves and Comparing Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02343003
Enrollment
151
Registered
2015-01-21
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2017-03-16
Last updated
2019-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Keywords

cooled radiofrequency ablation, knee pain, osteoarthritis, pain management

Brief summary

This study is designed to: * Determine the effectiveness (primarily measured by pain relief) of Coolief when used to create radiofrequency lesions of the genicular nerves compared to pain relief following corticosteroid injection; and * Confirm the safety of Coolief when used to perform radiofrequency lesions of the genicular nerves in subjects to manage knee pain compared to safety of corticosteroid injection

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects having knee pain undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion of the genicular nerves with the Coolief system compared to subjects receiving corticosteroid injection. A total of approximately 144 subjects will be enrolled into this study with subjects undergoing either radiofrequency neurotomy or corticosteroid injection in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow up will be conducted for a total of 12 months post Coolief procedure with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Subjects randomized to the comparison (corticosteroid) group will have the option to cross over to the neurotomy group after completing the 6 month endpoint assessment. They would then be followed for an additional 6 months. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups in order to determine success. Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the NRS scale at 6 Months. Primary Safety Endpoint: The proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up. Secondary Effectiveness Endpoints: * The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months. * Improvement in global outcome from baseline as measured by the Oxford Knee Score at 6 months and 12 months. Tertiary Effectiveness Endpoint: Subject satisfaction as measured by the Global Perceived Effect Score at 6 months and 12 months. Quaternary Effectiveness Endpoint: Reduction in pain medication usage from baseline as measured by subject self-reported average daily dosage. In addition, exploratory analyses of health economic indicators may be performed. Subjects will participate in the study for up to 13 months (2 week roll-in period + treatment visit + 12 month follow up), except for subjects who participate in the optional crossover group. These crossover subjects will be on study for up to 15 months (2 week roll-in + treatment + 6 month follow-up and crossover + 6 month follow up). Enrollment is anticipated to take approximately 6-8 months.

Interventions

Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe

DRUGCorticosteroid injection

Delivery of corticosteroid into knee by injection with needle to reduce knee pain

Sponsors

Halyard Health
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 21 years 2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures 3. History of chronic knee pain for longer than 6 months unresponsive to conservative treatments (PT, oral analgesics, intra-articular injections with steroids and/or viscosupplementation) 4. Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a geniculate nerve block of the index knee 5. Pain on NRS ≥ 6 on a 10 point scale for the index knee 6. Radiologic confirmation of osteoarthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) of OA grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 12 months for the index knee 7. Oxford Knee Score group at Baseline of ≤ 35 indicating moderate to severe OA in the index knee 8. If the patient is taking an opioid or other morphine equivalent medication, the dose must be considered clinically stable (defined as \<10% change in dosage for ≥ 2 months prior to the screening visit). 9. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin and antidepressants for pain such as Cymbalta must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the course of the study without approval of investigator. Agree to see one pain doctor (study investigator) for knee pain during the study period 10. Index knee pathology that is consistent with generally accepted indications for total knee arthroplasty. 11. Willing to delay any surgical intervention for the index knee for 12 months. 12. Willingness to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pseudo arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic inflammatory arthritis condition that could cause knee pain. 2. Previous or pending lower limb amputation. 3. Intra-articular steroid, platelet rich plasma (PRP) or hyaluronic acid injections in the index knee within 90 days from the screening visit. 4. An intra-articular corticosteroid injection is not indicated as an appropriate treatment option. 5. Prior radiofrequency of the genicular nerves of the index knee. 6. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty in index knee. 7. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee. 8. Evidence of structural abnormality other than osteoarthritis of knee, hip or back that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain. 9. BMI \> 40. 10. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns. 11. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation or disability remuneration (secondary gain) related to knee. 12. Pregnant or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period. 13. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction. 14. Beck's Depression Index score of \> 22 (indicates clinically depressed state). 15. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedure. 16. Systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved). 17. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable. 18. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol. 19. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance or alcohol abuse. 20. Current prescribed opioid medications equivalent to greater than 60 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose. 21. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.) 22. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker or defibrillator. 23. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent. 24. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)6 monthsThe number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals no pain and 10 points equals the worst pain.
Safety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.6 months and 12 monthsSafety Endpoint: Number of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Rating Scale12 monthsThe number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals no pain and 10 points equals the worst pain.
Oxford Knee Score6 months and 12 monthsImprovement in global outcome from baseline as measured by the Oxford Knee Score at 6 months and 12 months. The Oxford Knee Score is determined by a 12-question survey that measures knee function, and is scored on a scale that ranges from 0 - 48 points, with scores of 0 - 19 = severe arthritis, 20 - 29 = moderate to severe arthritis, 30 - 39 = mild to moderate arthritis, and 40 - 48 = satisfactory joint function.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Satisfaction - Number of Participants With a Global Perceived Effect Score of 5 or Greater6 months and 12 monthsSubject satisfaction as measured by the Global Perceived Effect Score at 6 months and 12 months. The study subjects' perception of treatment effect was reflected by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE). The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = worst ever, 2 points = much worse, 3 points = worse, 4 points = not improved but not worse, 5 points = improved, 6 points = much improved, 7 points = best ever.
Medication Usage6 months and 12 monthsReduction in pain medication usage from baseline as measured by subject self-reported average daily dosage.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cooled Radiofrequency
Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to study subjects' knees to ablate culprit sensory nerves and reduce knee pain Cooled Radiofrequency: Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe
76
Corticosteroid Injection
Corticosteroid injections will be administered to study subjects' knees to reduce knee pain Corticosteroid injection: Delivery of corticosteroid into knee by injection with needle to reduce knee pain
75
Total151

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall Studyexclusion criteria met11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up51
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall Studyterminated by sponsor20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject94

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCorticosteroid InjectionCooled RadiofrequencyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
45 Participants31 Participants76 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants45 Participants75 Participants
Age, Continuous66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
75 participants76 participants151 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants50 Participants99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants26 Participants52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
43 / 7625 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 769 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

The number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals no pain and 10 points equals the worst pain.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 58 of the 76 originally-randomized study subjects in the Cooled radiofrequency group completed this 6 month outcome. 68 of the originally-randomized 75 study subjects in the Corticosteroid injection group completed this 6 month outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cooled RadiofrequencyNumeric Rating Scale (NRS)43 Participants
Corticosteroid InjectionNumeric Rating Scale (NRS)11 Participants
Primary

Safety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.

Safety Endpoint: Number of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cooled RadiofrequencySafety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.6 months post-intervention34 Participants
Cooled RadiofrequencySafety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.12 months post-intervention12 Participants
Corticosteroid InjectionSafety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.6 months post-intervention31 Participants
Corticosteroid InjectionSafety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up.12 months post-intervention3 Participants
Secondary

Numeric Rating Scale

The number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals no pain and 10 points equals the worst pain.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 52 of the 76 originally-randomized study subjects in the Cooled radiofrequency group completed this 12 month outcome. 4 of the originally-randomized 75 study subjects in the Corticosteroid injection group completed this 12 month outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cooled RadiofrequencyNumeric Rating Scale34 Participants
Corticosteroid InjectionNumeric Rating Scale2 Participants
Secondary

Oxford Knee Score

Improvement in global outcome from baseline as measured by the Oxford Knee Score at 6 months and 12 months. The Oxford Knee Score is determined by a 12-question survey that measures knee function, and is scored on a scale that ranges from 0 - 48 points, with scores of 0 - 19 = severe arthritis, 20 - 29 = moderate to severe arthritis, 30 - 39 = mild to moderate arthritis, and 40 - 48 = satisfactory joint function.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: 58 of the 76 originally-randomized study subjects in the Cooled radiofrequency group completed this 6 month outcome. 67 of the originally-randomized 75 study subjects in the Corticosteroid injection group completed this 6 month outcome. 12 months: 52/76 in Cooled radiofrequency group and 3/75 in Corticosteroid injection group completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cooled RadiofrequencyOxford Knee Score6 months post-intervention18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Cooled RadiofrequencyOxford Knee Score12 months post-intervention17.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Corticosteroid InjectionOxford Knee Score12 months post-intervention8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Corticosteroid InjectionOxford Knee Score6 months post-intervention5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Other Pre-specified

Medication Usage

Reduction in pain medication usage from baseline as measured by subject self-reported average daily dosage.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: 17 of the 76 originally-randomized study subjects in the Cooled radiofrequency group completed this 6 month outcome. 25 of the originally-randomized 75 study subjects in the Corticosteroid injection group completed this 6 month outcome. 12 months: 17/76 in Cooled radiofrequency group and 2/75 in Corticosteroid injection group completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cooled RadiofrequencyMedication Usage6 months post-intervention2.4 milligramsStandard Deviation 8.3
Cooled RadiofrequencyMedication Usage12 months post-intervention1 milligramsStandard Deviation 10.3
Corticosteroid InjectionMedication Usage6 months post-intervention-0.6 milligramsStandard Deviation 9.8
Corticosteroid InjectionMedication Usage12 months post-intervention2.5 milligramsStandard Deviation 17.7
Other Pre-specified

Subject Satisfaction - Number of Participants With a Global Perceived Effect Score of 5 or Greater

Subject satisfaction as measured by the Global Perceived Effect Score at 6 months and 12 months. The study subjects' perception of treatment effect was reflected by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE). The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = worst ever, 2 points = much worse, 3 points = worse, 4 points = not improved but not worse, 5 points = improved, 6 points = much improved, 7 points = best ever.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: 58 of the 76 originally-randomized study subjects in the Cooled radiofrequency group completed this 6 month outcome. 67 of the originally-randomized 75 study subjects in the Corticosteroid injection group completed this 6 month outcome. 12 months: 52/76 in Cooled radiofrequency group and 4/75 in Corticosteroid injection group completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cooled RadiofrequencySubject Satisfaction - Number of Participants With a Global Perceived Effect Score of 5 or Greater12 months post-intervention39 Participants
Cooled RadiofrequencySubject Satisfaction - Number of Participants With a Global Perceived Effect Score of 5 or Greater6 months post-intervention53 Participants
Corticosteroid InjectionSubject Satisfaction - Number of Participants With a Global Perceived Effect Score of 5 or Greater6 months post-intervention16 Participants
Corticosteroid InjectionSubject Satisfaction - Number of Participants With a Global Perceived Effect Score of 5 or Greater12 months post-intervention2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026