Skip to content

Impact of Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Participants

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Assess the Impact of Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod on Central Nervous System Tissue Damage and Recovery in Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Subjects

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02342704
Acronym
REVEAL
Enrollment
111
Registered
2015-01-21
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2016-05-18
Last updated
2017-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the effect of natalizumab compared to fingolimod on the evolution of new on-treatment T1-gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions to persistent black holes (PBH) over 52 weeks. The secondary objectives of this study in this study population are to assess the effect of natalizumab compared to fingolimod on: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of central nervous system (CNS) tissue destruction as measured by the number of new T1-Gd+ lesions; various other MRI measures of disease activity; No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA); Relapse on treatment over 52 weeks; The change in information processing speed as measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).

Detailed description

This study also includes a Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) sub-study that includes healthy volunteers. Healthy volunteers will not receive any study medication.

Interventions

DRUGnatalizumab

Administered as specified in the treatment arm

DRUGfingolimod

Administered as specified in the treatment arm

Sponsors

Biogen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria for MS Patients: * Must have a documented diagnosis of relapsing MS (McDonald 2010 Criteria) at study screening with EDSS score from 0.0 to 5.5. * If the subject is on Betaseron, Rebif, Avonex, Copaxone, Extavia, Tecfidera, and Aubagio (BRACE-TA) at study screening: * He/she must have been on therapy for at least 6 months (unless experiencing highly active disease), have at least 9 T2-hyperintense lesions on a brain MRI scan, and have experienced ≥1 relapse within the last 6 months prior to study screening with ≥1 new T1-Gd+ lesion on a brain MRI scan performed ≤6 months prior to study screening or ≥2 new T2 lesions on a brain MRI scan performed ≤6 months prior to study screening, with comparison made to a T2 MRI scan performed up to 18 months before study screening * If the subject has highly active disease, regardless of whether they are disease-modifying therapy (DMT)-naïve or had previous exposure to Betaseron, Rebif, Avonex, Copaxone, Extavia, Tecfidera, and Aubagio (BRACE-TA), they must have had ≥2 disabling relapses in the 12 months prior to study screening and either ≥1 new T1-Gd+ lesion on a brain MRI scan performed ≤6 months prior to study screening or ≥2 new T2 lesions on a brain MRI scan performed ≤6 months prior to study screening, with comparison made to a T2 MRI scan performed up to 18 months before study screening Key

Exclusion criteria

for MS Patients: * Diagnosis of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and/or Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. * History or positive test result at study screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody or current hepatitis B infection (defined as positive for hepatitis B surface antigen \[HBsAg\] and/or hepatitis B core antibody \[HBcAb\]). * Prior treatment with natalizumab or fingolimod. * History of or known active malignant disease, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies (subjects with cutaneous basal and squamous cell carcinoma that has been completely excised and considered cured prior to study screening remain eligible). * History of opportunistic infections or any clinically significant major disease, as determined by the Investigator. * A clinically significant infectious illness (e.g., pneumonia, septicemia) within the 1 month prior to study screening. * History of drug or alcohol abuse (as defined by the Investigator) within 1 year prior to study screening. * Prior history of immunosuppressant use (e.g., mitoxantrone, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, cladribine, rituximab), or exposure to intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV), monoclonal antibodies, cytokines, growth factors, soluble receptors, other recombinant products, or fusion proteins in the last 12 months prior to study screening. * History of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, decompensated heart failure in last 6 months. * Treatment with Class Ia (e.g., procainamide, quinidine, ajmaline, disopyramide) or Class III (amiodarone, bretylium, dofelitide, sotalol, ibulitide, azilimide) anti-arrhythmic drugs. * Concurrent therapy with drugs that slow heart rate (e.g., beta-blockers, heart-rate lowering calcium channel blockers such as diltiazem or verapamil, or digoxin). * Hypertension not controlled with prescribed medications. * History of severe respiratory disease, pulmonary fibrosis or class III or IV chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. * The use of live or live attenuated vaccination within 8 weeks of study screening. Key Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Volunteers: * Subjects who are generally healthy as demonstrated by physical examination and by medical history, with no history or evidence of major illnesses, diseases, or disorders. * Subjects of childbearing potential must practice effective contraception and be willing and able to continue contraception for duration of the study. * No history of drug or alcohol abuse (as defined by the Investigator) within 1 year prior to study screening. Key

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cumulative Number of ≥ 6-Month Confirmed T1-Hypointense Lesions Arising From New On-Treatment T1-Gadolinium-Enhancing (Gd+) LesionsUp to Week 52

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Risk of RelapseUp to Week 52A clinical relapse was defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms, not associated with fever, lasting for at least 24 hours, and followed by a period of 30 days of stability or improvement.
Cumulative Number of New T1-Gd+ LesionsBaseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 24Baseline, Week 24As assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Change From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 52Baseline, Week 52As assessed by MRI.
Time to First RelapseUp to Week 52A clinical relapse was defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms, not associated with fever, lasting for at least 24 hours, and followed by a period of 30 days of stability or improvement.
Proportion of Participants With No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA)Up to Week 52NEDA was defined as all of the following: no relapses; no 12-week confirmed disability progression based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; defined as an increase of 1.0 or more on the EDSS from baseline of 1.0 or more, or an increase of 1.5 or more from a baseline score of 0) that was sustained for 12 weeks; no new T1-Gd+ lesions on brain MRI. No new or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions.
Time to Complete Recovery From First RelapseUp to Week 5212-week confirmed complete EDSS recovery from first on-treatment relapse is defined as an EDSS score that is equal to or lower than the last pre-relapse EDSS score and sustained for at least 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at Week 24Baseline, Week 24The SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires elements of attention, visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds. The total score provides a measure of the speed and accuracy of symbol-digit substitution.
Change From Baseline in SDMT at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires elements of attention, visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds. The total score provides a measure of the speed and accuracy of symbol-digit substitution.
Cumulative Number of New or Enlarging T2 LesionsBaseline, Week 24

Countries

Australia, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 128 participants were screened, 111 participants were enrolled in the study. Three participants were not randomized and did not receive any dose of study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Natalizumab
Open-label natalizumab 300 mg IV every 4 weeks
54
Fingolimod
Open-label fingolimod 0.5 mg once daily orally
54
Total108

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event13
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyOther01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision03
Overall StudySponsor Termination4943
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNatalizumabFingolimodTotal
Age, Continuous38.19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.811
34.87 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.731
36.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.887
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants38 Participants75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants16 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 5423 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 542 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Number of ≥ 6-Month Confirmed T1-Hypointense Lesions Arising From New On-Treatment T1-Gadolinium-Enhancing (Gd+) Lesions

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The limited number of participants enrolled and the early termination of the study resulted in efficacy data not collected, and efficacy outcomes not analyzed, as per the pre-specified plan of analysis.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in SDMT at Week 52

The SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires elements of attention, visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds. The total score provides a measure of the speed and accuracy of symbol-digit substitution.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had both baseline and post-baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FingolimodChange From Baseline in SDMT at Week 522.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.492
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at Week 24

The SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires elements of attention, visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds. The total score provides a measure of the speed and accuracy of symbol-digit substitution.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had both baseline and post-baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NatalizumabChange From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at Week 243.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.684
FingolimodChange From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at Week 243.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 24

As assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had an assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NatalizumabChange From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 24T1 Lesion Volume Change0.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.235
NatalizumabChange From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 24T2 Lesion Volume Change0.08 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.399
FingolimodChange From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 24T2 Lesion Volume Change3.32 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.036
FingolimodChange From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 24T1 Lesion Volume Change1.81 percentage changeStandard Deviation 19.703
Comparison: T1 Lesion Volume Changep-value: 0.5318Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Comparison: T2 Lesion Volume Changep-value: 0.0528Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 52

As assessed by MRI.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had an assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
FingolimodChange From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 52T1 Lesion Volume Change-15.31 percentage change
FingolimodChange From Baseline in Total T1-Hypointense and Total T2-Hyperintense Lesion Volumes at Week 52T2 Lesion Volume Change5.6 percentage change
Secondary

Cumulative Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had an assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NatalizumabCumulative Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions1.33 lesionsStandard Deviation 2.469
FingolimodCumulative Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions1.94 lesionsStandard Deviation 2.205
p-value: 0.2632Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Secondary

Cumulative Number of New T1-Gd+ Lesions

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NatalizumabCumulative Number of New T1-Gd+ LesionsFrom Baseline to Week 40.62 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.512
NatalizumabCumulative Number of New T1-Gd+ LesionsFrom Baseline to Week 120.68 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.695
NatalizumabCumulative Number of New T1-Gd+ LesionsFrom Baseline to Week 240.72 lesionsStandard Deviation 1.69
FingolimodCumulative Number of New T1-Gd+ LesionsFrom Baseline to Week 41.69 lesionsStandard Deviation 4.122
FingolimodCumulative Number of New T1-Gd+ LesionsFrom Baseline to Week 122.27 lesionsStandard Deviation 4.499
FingolimodCumulative Number of New T1-Gd+ LesionsFrom Baseline to Week 242.6 lesionsStandard Deviation 4.745
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.126Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.3525negative binomial regression
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0127Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.0299negative binomial regression
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0123Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Comparison: Week 24p-value: 0.0076negative binomial regression
Secondary

Cumulative Risk of Relapse

A clinical relapse was defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms, not associated with fever, lasting for at least 24 hours, and followed by a period of 30 days of stability or improvement.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The limited number of participants enrolled and the early termination of the study resulted in efficacy data not collected, and efficacy outcomes not analyzed, as per the pre-specified plan of analysis.

Secondary

Proportion of Participants With No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA)

NEDA was defined as all of the following: no relapses; no 12-week confirmed disability progression based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; defined as an increase of 1.0 or more on the EDSS from baseline of 1.0 or more, or an increase of 1.5 or more from a baseline score of 0) that was sustained for 12 weeks; no new T1-Gd+ lesions on brain MRI. No new or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The limited number of participants enrolled and the early termination of the study resulted in efficacy data not collected, and efficacy outcomes not analyzed, as per the pre-specified plan of analysis.

Secondary

Time to Complete Recovery From First Relapse

12-week confirmed complete EDSS recovery from first on-treatment relapse is defined as an EDSS score that is equal to or lower than the last pre-relapse EDSS score and sustained for at least 12 weeks.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The limited number of participants enrolled and the early termination of the study resulted in efficacy data not collected, and efficacy outcomes not analyzed, as per the pre-specified plan of analysis.

Secondary

Time to First Relapse

A clinical relapse was defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms, not associated with fever, lasting for at least 24 hours, and followed by a period of 30 days of stability or improvement.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: The limited number of participants enrolled and the early termination of the study resulted in efficacy data not collected, and efficacy outcomes not analyzed, as per the pre-specified plan of analysis.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026